Most seek more time for answering GWB traffic jam subpoenas
Source: Bergen Record
Monday February 3, 2014, 8:35 AM BY ANGELA DELLI SANTI AND GEOFF MULVIHILL
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) Twenty people and organizations close to New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie are due to turn over emails, text messages and other documents involving an apparent vindictive plot to block traffic near the George Washington Bridge, though almost all the subpoena recipients have requested more time.
Assemblyman John Wisniewski, the co-chairman of the joint legislative panel leading the investigation, told The Associated Press that some extensions of Monday's deadline were granted. The requests of others who were asked to produce documents on a rolling basis were also being considered.
The subpoena returns are likely to be voluminous, as the committee seeks to unravel how high up Christie's chain of command the order to shut traffic lanes went, whether the operation was meant to punish a Democratic adversary, and if so, why?
Christie has denied knowing about the planning or execution of the operation, and has said he learned that members of his inner circle were involved after an original batch of subpoenaed documents was published on Jan. 8. However, one former loyalist, David Wildstein, indicated Friday there was contradictory evidence to show that the governor knew about the closings as they were happening.
Read more: http://www.northjersey.com/news/state/Most_seek_more_time_in_GWB_traffic_jam_subpoenas.html
Rumor is that the shredder burned out over the weekend!
Botany
(70,582 posts)"Christie has denied knowing about the planning or execution of the operation, and has
said he learned that members of his inner circle were involved after an original batch
of subpoenaed documents was published on Jan. 8. However, one former loyalist,
David Wildstein, indicated Friday there was contradictory evidence to show that the
governor knew about the closings as they were happening."
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)at the shredder.
Herself
(185 posts)... subpoenas would require evidence to be turned over to feds.
1? The evidence was turned over, but the investigation is not publicizing it as it's putting together the pieces...
2? The physical possession of the evidence is not with Wildstein, but he knows it's location???
Is it wrong that I'm smiling?: