Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 09:35 AM Jan 2014

Obama: Clapper ‘should have been more careful’ in congressional testimony

Source: The Hill

Obama said Clapper felt "that he was caught between a rock and a hard place."

President Obama said Friday that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper “should have been more careful” when he testified to a Senate panel last year that the National Security Agency did not collect data on millions of Americans.

“I think that Jim Clapper himself would acknowledge, and has acknowledged, that he should have been more careful about how he responded,” Obama told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “His concern was that he had a classified program that he couldn't talk about and he was in an open hearing in which he was asked, he was prompted to disclose a program, and so he felt that he was caught between a rock and a hard place.”

In July, Clapper apologized to the Senate Intelligence Committee for his “clearly erroneous” testimony.



Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/197060-obama-clapper-should-have-been-more-careful-in-congressional

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama: Clapper ‘should have been more careful’ in congressional testimony (Original Post) jakeXT Jan 2014 OP
"We pay this guy to lie." truthisfreedom Jan 2014 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author truthisfreedom Jan 2014 #2
He fucking lied to Congress, by his own admission. Hold him accountable dammit! Scuba Jan 2014 #3
Releasing classified information is a serious crime. NutmegYankee Jan 2014 #19
He should be in court facing charges! another_liberal Jan 2014 #4
Oh silly you ...that would only happen to little people. L0oniX Jan 2014 #12
caught between a rock and a hard place. Autumn Jan 2014 #5
This was a mistake by both the Senate and Mr. Clapper...... Swede Atlanta Jan 2014 #6
This guy lies to Congress and walks Titonwan Jan 2014 #7
...if we wish to be free.. brisas2k Jan 2014 #8
Clapper is Oliver North v2.0, as far as I'm concerned. bullwinkle428 Jan 2014 #9
Haig 2.0 MisterP Jan 2014 #15
What. A. Load. Of. Horseshit. DeSwiss Jan 2014 #10
That makes everything OK, then. OnyxCollie Jan 2014 #11
Clapper broke the 11th Commandment: PeoViejo Jan 2014 #13
Oopsie. Dr. Strange Jan 2014 #14
LIES blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #16
AND MORE LIES blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #17
LYING LIARS LIE blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #18

Response to jakeXT (Original post)

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
19. Releasing classified information is a serious crime.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 07:54 PM
Jan 2014

If Congress really wanted an answer, they could have closed the hearing. The guy was basically entrapped. He was required to state an answer, but any answer would be illegal.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
6. This was a mistake by both the Senate and Mr. Clapper......
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 09:52 AM
Jan 2014

If the topic of discussion was a classified "secret" program then this should not have been an open hearing. Mr. Clapper should have answered that the line of questioning involved a classified program and he was not going to answer that in an open hearing and request a closed session.

But the Senate should also not have asked these questions in an open session.

Before you hit the reply with a scathing response let me say this....We are at a very dangerous crossroads in this country. We have good people in the Congress, especially in the Senate, who want to inform the American people about what is going on. The problem is they are bound by confidentiality not to disclose anything material that comes out of a closed hearing or a classified report. They can face criminal charges if they do.

So if they can't tell us what the government is up to then the only option we have is to make those hearings open so the American people can hear for themselves what is going on and it frees Congress to discuss and report on these programs to their constituents.

But as long as you have these secret programs and Congressional oversight requires no one can publicly disclose details of these programs, we are screwed. It is only when whistleblowers like Edward Snowden pull back the veil do we see for ourselves that our government is doing in secret.

Titonwan

(785 posts)
7. This guy lies to Congress and walks
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 10:11 AM
Jan 2014

Anyone of us that tried that would be in Guantanamo Bay or the SuperMax in Colorado. More of our two tiered justice system.

 

brisas2k

(76 posts)
8. ...if we wish to be free..
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 10:19 AM
Jan 2014

"If we wish to be free; if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending; if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained—we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms, and to the God of hosts, is all that is left us."
-- Patrick Henry, Speech in Virginia Convention, Richmond, March 23, 1775




 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
10. What. A. Load. Of. Horseshit.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 10:24 AM
Jan 2014

What is worse, they know they don't have to come up with anything plausible. They can trot this sorry-ass ''he misspoke and should have been more careful'' crappola and who's gonna say anything? Listen, if Crapper is so inept, how the hell can he be in-charge of the nation's secrets? Oh, that's right -- I forgot, Snowden. Never mind.

- You all are out of your league.....

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama: Clapper ‘should ha...