Danish Government Splits as Goldman Sachs Bid Pushed Through
Source: Bloomberg News
Denmarks government mustered enough votes to let Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) buy a stake in state-owned Dong Energy A/S after resistance to the deal prompted one of the ruling coalitions three parties to quit.
The government of Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt won majority lawmaker backing for the deal even after the Socialist Peoples Party left the coalition today.
Parliaments finance committee agreed to let the Wall Street bank pay 8 billion kroner ($1.5 billion) for an 18 percent stake in Dong. A Megafon poll conducted by TV2 showed 68 percent of Danes are against Goldman holding the stake and thousands of protesters gathered outside the parliament last night to voice their anger over the deal.
Dong is selling the shares as part of a financial restructuring announced in February last year to cut costs, reduce debt and bolster investments in oil and gas exploration, as well as in wind farms. The plan included cutting expenses by 20 percent and selling assets to raise 10 billion kroner.
Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-29/goldman-1-5-billion-bid-imperils-danish-government-re-election.html
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)for sanity in public policy, but apparently the "privatization" contagion has spread and that bodes ill for the future.
rurallib
(62,441 posts)been held at bay for quite a while, but....
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)- Always in the picture........
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)Along with many others, we hold great hope for "change" in a peaceful direction. If President Obama is unwilling to earn his Nobel Prize, the planet will be disappointed. It's a heavy load with already guaranteed rewards of becoming more wealthy than the Clintons. (some snark here, "don't be cruel"
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)under the table to do this deal. The narrative goes like this: Goldman or some other Goldmanesque money changer wants a piece of the public's action. Seventy percent of the public say "no thanks" The public's "representatives" cut it in anyway. This transfer of public wealth is usually augmented by a reduction in public services. It has become a tediously common plot.