Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:42 AM Mar 2012

Anti-abortion activist might keep Obama from unanimous re-nomination

Source: The Hill

Randall Terry, the controversial anti-abortion activist, won 18 percent of the vote in Oklahoma’s Democratic primary on Tuesday night, making him eligible for at least one of the state’s delegates.

President Obama had been the unanimous victor in every Democratic primary contest leading up to Tuesday.

Obama won Oklahoma with 57 percent, but Terry’s more than 20,000 votes was good enough to carry 12 counties in the deeply red state.

Obama secured 39 of the state’s 50 delegates on Tuesday, but Terry qualified for up to six. Another five remain uncommitted and will likely go to Obama.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/214635-anti-abortion-activist-may-keep-obama-from-unanimous-re-nomination



Back in 2000 Lyndon LaRouche won some delegates in Arkansas, but the DNC denied them, citing the fact that he was ineligible to vote.
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anti-abortion activist might keep Obama from unanimous re-nomination (Original Post) Freddie Stubbs Mar 2012 OP
I strongly doubt that it was Democrats who voted for Terry in Oklahoma. sinkingfeeling Mar 2012 #1
OK has closed primaries: Freddie Stubbs Mar 2012 #2
Objection duly noted. bluedigger Mar 2012 #3
The only problem with this is that the challenge to BO should be from the LEFT. No way does Vincardog Mar 2012 #4
Democratic voters haven't given any support to President Obama's fringe opponents on the left Freddie Stubbs Mar 2012 #5
True - TBF Mar 2012 #20
Actually, no. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #6
I can get a poll to say anything. There is a difference between "support" and not wanting any Vincardog Mar 2012 #16
You are in the 15% of Liberal Dems that disapprove of Obama emulatorloo Mar 2012 #30
You paint with a broad brush. I do NOT "disapprove of Obama" nor do I "oppose" him. Vincardog Mar 2012 #31
LOL emulatorloo Mar 2012 #33
As I pointed out before... Chan790 Mar 2012 #23
WARREN 2016 joshcryer Mar 2012 #41
The left want Obama to defeat Romtorum and for Dems to take back the House and keep Senate. emulatorloo Mar 2012 #29
I oppose BO's drift to the right and corporate control. You say I don't represent the views Vincardog Mar 2012 #32
The leftists I know (including me) are pragmatists rather than rigid ideologues emulatorloo Mar 2012 #34
Interesting how you 'complex' view allows you to project your opinions on to me. But my narrow Vincardog Mar 2012 #45
Although Oklahoma has a closed primary, many OKNancy Mar 2012 #7
I agree: Southern Dems have long been a different animal, though times are changing. sybylla Mar 2012 #21
Randall Terry is a pig. kag Mar 2012 #8
Geez, we need to get the "anti-abortion" term out of MSM and get it replaced with "anti-choice" Lionessa Mar 2012 #9
Exactly peace frog Mar 2012 #14
I aggree 100% dmr Mar 2012 #15
and we need to get the anti-choice people... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2012 #19
maybe call them anti-birth control StarsInHerHair Mar 2012 #36
Well, that's democracy for ya bigworld Mar 2012 #10
Why does it have to be unanimous? Iggo Mar 2012 #11
Terry has for years been trouble. There are more evangelical asjr Mar 2012 #12
And here I was hoping Vermin Supreme was going to get some delegates thelordofhell Mar 2012 #13
I love the part at the end of the video when he "turns Randall Terry gay" Bjorn Against Mar 2012 #35
I love Vermin Supreme! a simple pattern Mar 2012 #38
Randall Terry is a terrorist, and should be treated like one. baldguy Mar 2012 #17
Terrorist? sakabatou Mar 2012 #24
He posts lists of names, office and home addresses for doctors and their families. ieoeja Mar 2012 #25
Definitely obvious. sakabatou Mar 2012 #27
He supports murder to forward his political goals. baldguy Mar 2012 #26
Ah. sakabatou Mar 2012 #28
He is at least a supporter of terrorism when it suits his cause LeftishBrit Mar 2012 #43
geez barbtries Mar 2012 #18
The Wretch Will Not Make It Past The Credentials Committee, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #22
I feel sorry for smart Oklahomans that live Lucky Luciano Mar 2012 #37
Can the OK Dem party just break away from the national geek tragedy Mar 2012 #39
Don't worry, the DNC will either find a reason not to seat them dflprincess Mar 2012 #40
The delegates would be denied, even if "won." David__77 Mar 2012 #42
Am I supposed to care? GeorgeGist Mar 2012 #44

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
4. The only problem with this is that the challenge to BO should be from the LEFT. No way does
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:49 AM
Mar 2012

BO need to move further right. What is he supposed to do hire Rush LimpBalls as a spokesman?

TBF

(32,086 posts)
20. True -
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:44 PM
Mar 2012

unfortunately what I've seen on the Internet from disgruntled liberals is disinterest (ie working on Occupy - may or may not show up to vote), or switching to Paul because of his anti-war, pro-pot stance (ie have gone off the deep end).

If there is any challenge I'd much rather see it come from further left but that doesn't seem to be happening.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
16. I can get a poll to say anything. There is a difference between "support" and not wanting any
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:31 PM
Mar 2012

improvement. Your poll does not show that BO is progressive enough.
Self identified Liberals may be anyone to the left (or right) of Genghis Kahn.

emulatorloo

(44,175 posts)
30. You are in the 15% of Liberal Dems that disapprove of Obama
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 07:23 PM
Mar 2012

You are well within your rights to do so, and you have reasons for your positions.

But do not confuse a minority position with a majority position, just because you believe it or you hear other people echo your views on from a highly rarified self-selected sample. Like members of Democratic Underground.

ON EDIT: That does not mean that the 85% approve of every single thing Obama has done. However they are unwilling to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

ON EDIT: Somewhere I have heard that only 20% identify themselves as Liberals. (I may be a little off on this number) So think about what that means when we talk 15% of Liberal Democrats who disapprove of Obama.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
31. You paint with a broad brush. I do NOT "disapprove of Obama" nor do I "oppose" him.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 07:36 PM
Mar 2012

I have problems with some of his positions, and I have reasons for my problems with his positions.
I am not "willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater".
I am advocating for BO to change his direction in those areas where I believe he is headed in the wrong direction.
I am within my right to state that I do not believe that he has done enough to earn my vote.
That does not imply that I am willing to vote for the idiots on the other side of the race.

Why do you assume I my position is that of the minority?
I do not believe that you position of unconditional support is the Majority opinion just because you believe it or you hear other people echo your views on a highly rarified self-selected sample like members of Democratic Underground.

emulatorloo

(44,175 posts)
33. LOL
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 07:57 PM
Mar 2012

Vicardog: "I do not believe that your position of unconditional support is the Majority opinion just because you believe it or you"

LOL, What a ridiculous thing to say. That kind of hyperbole makes you look silly.

Vicardog: "I am within my right to state that I do not believe that he has done enough to earn my vote."

Reread my post.

What part of my statement that "You are well within your rights to do so, and you have reasons for your positions" contradicts your "I am within my right to state that I do not believe that he has done enough to earn my vote."

Think before you put words into my mouth.

"Why do you assume I my position is that of the minority?" Because that is what the polling shows, and not just gallup polling. The majority of liberal democrats never wanted a primary challenge.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
23. As I pointed out before...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 04:59 PM
Mar 2012

Liberal Dems are also smarter...smart enough to lie when asked because Rush, Beck and Hannity would have a field day with the story if there was even a hint of liberal-flight from the "socialist" President.

But mark my words, there will be a liberal at the top of the 2016 ticket or else there will be a 2016 Republican Presidential election winner.

emulatorloo

(44,175 posts)
29. The left want Obama to defeat Romtorum and for Dems to take back the House and keep Senate.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 07:19 PM
Mar 2012

You may not want that, but your views don't represent the views of the left and liberal Democrats.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
32. I oppose BO's drift to the right and corporate control. You say I don't represent the views
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 07:40 PM
Mar 2012

of the left? Please.
Surely you jest. Please enlighten me. What does the "Left" really want?

emulatorloo

(44,175 posts)
34. The leftists I know (including me) are pragmatists rather than rigid ideologues
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:03 PM
Mar 2012

They don't think in black and white and have a more complex view of the political sphere, which includes context.

Think Rachel Maddow.

ON EDIT: I do apologize for the above "You may not want that" re defeating Romtorum. That was snarky and hyperbolic and I should not have said it.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
45. Interesting how you 'complex' view allows you to project your opinions on to me. But my narrow
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 12:10 PM
Mar 2012

view is irrelevant.

Where is the complexity is asserting opinions I have never expressed?

Where is the complexity in taking that I think in "black and white" for daring to say that I believe BO should move a lot further to the left, when you seem to allow NO criticism of him or his policies?

Project much?

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
7. Although Oklahoma has a closed primary, many
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:02 PM
Mar 2012

people are registered as Democrat who really aren't. This is left over from the days when local and state government was all Democratic. The first time we had a Republican majority in the State House and Senate was within the last two years.
Even my very, very right wing father in law kept his registration as a Democrat.

This is slowly changing.

999,943 - Democratic
849,332 - Republican
240,855 - Independent

as of Jan 2011
---

look at this and notice in many counties it is two to one for Dems. http://www.ok.gov/elections/documents/reg_0111.pdf

-----------------

People who voted for Terry are not REAL Democrats. They are fake Dems

sybylla

(8,526 posts)
21. I agree: Southern Dems have long been a different animal, though times are changing.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:12 PM
Mar 2012

I'm great friends with a Northern Dem who was a Florida Republican in the 60's because that was the party of liberals in the south.

kag

(4,079 posts)
8. Randall Terry is a pig.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:04 PM
Mar 2012

I don't understand how he hasn't been arrested and convicted of inciting violence, and promoting the murder of doctors who treat pregnant women.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
9. Geez, we need to get the "anti-abortion" term out of MSM and get it replaced with "anti-choice"
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:10 PM
Mar 2012

That said I don't think this will be the least of an issue for Obama.

dmr

(28,349 posts)
15. I aggree 100%
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:47 PM
Mar 2012

It irritates the hell out of me. Everyone I know on the Left is pro-life.

On the Left we trust & respect women. We are pro-life & pro-choice.

On the Right they distrust & disrespect women. They are anti-women.

StarsInHerHair

(2,125 posts)
36. maybe call them anti-birth control
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 09:16 PM
Mar 2012

saying anti-choice makes it seem like an inconvenience, at least that's the way they've twisted the meaning over 20 years

bigworld

(1,807 posts)
10. Well, that's democracy for ya
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:13 PM
Mar 2012

It's a little sloppy sometimes, but I'd rather have a Randall Terry on the ballot than have it any other way.

asjr

(10,479 posts)
12. Terry has for years been trouble. There are more evangelical
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 12:31 PM
Mar 2012

voters now than ever before and it is because of people like Terry who want to tell the rest of the world how to live and vote. I wish his branch would become its own party so we would know exactly who and how many of them there are.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
35. I love the part at the end of the video when he "turns Randall Terry gay"
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:39 PM
Mar 2012

Vermine Supreme is my favorite Presidential candidate this year. Of course I would never actually want to see him as President as that would be a bit too crazy, but watching him run for office is pure entertainment. If you take the guy literally you will think he is crazy, but if you view him as a satirist then you can see that he is actually quite brilliant.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
17. Randall Terry is a terrorist, and should be treated like one.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:32 PM
Mar 2012

And any Democrat voting for him should be exposed.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
25. He posts lists of names, office and home addresses for doctors and their families.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 06:06 PM
Mar 2012

If one of the many procedures performed by the doctor happens to be abortion.

He stops just shy of telling people to kill. But his implication is overtly obvious. And at least one dedicated follower did kill someone he got off Randall's list.


LeftishBrit

(41,209 posts)
43. He is at least a supporter of terrorism when it suits his cause
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 05:56 AM
Mar 2012

He said that Dr Tiller, murdered by an anti-abortion extremist, 'reaped what he sowed'.

The Magistrate

(95,252 posts)
22. The Wretch Will Not Make It Past The Credentials Committee, Sir
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:26 PM
Mar 2012

Hopefully the twist in the rules by which it is done will show some elegance....

"Rover was killed by a Pontiac, and it was done with such grace and artistry witnesses awarded the driver both ears and the tail."

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
39. Can the OK Dem party just break away from the national
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:06 PM
Mar 2012

party and stop undercutting us? It's not like they're worth a bucket of warm spit to us in Congress.

dflprincess

(28,082 posts)
40. Don't worry, the DNC will either find a reason not to seat them
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:37 PM
Mar 2012

or see to it that they're not on the floor when the vote is done.

David__77

(23,484 posts)
42. The delegates would be denied, even if "won."
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 04:47 AM
Mar 2012

Lyndon LaRouche won several delegates in 1996 in Arkansas running as a Democrat against Clinton. Now, as then, the DNC would simply declare the challenger not to be a "bona fide Democrat." It is entirely legal.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Anti-abortion activist mi...