Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,639 posts)
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 10:01 PM Dec 2013

Reversal on ACA cancellations gets mixed response

Source: AP-Excite

By EMERY P. DALESIO

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) - A month after President Barack Obama announced people could keep insurance policies slated for cancellation under the federal health overhaul, the reversal has gotten a mixed response from insurers, state regulators and consumers.

Many consumers complained in October and November after insurers notified them that their individual policies were being canceled because they did not cover pre-existing conditions, hospitalization, prescription drugs or seven other basic benefits required under the law. In pitching the overhaul, Obama had long promised that people who liked their policies could keep them.

Then Obama announced Nov. 14 that companies could continue existing policies that don't meet the minimum requirements if state regulators approved.

Reporting by The Associated Press shows that older policies are being allowed to continue in 36 states, either because officials allowed it after Obama's announcement, decided not to intervene in any way or had made a decision earlier in the year to extend non-compliant policies for a period of time.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20131226/DAAUAHA83.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reversal on ACA cancellations gets mixed response (Original Post) Omaha Steve Dec 2013 OP
ACA is FUBAR Demeter Dec 2013 #1
IF Obama had had 60 votes in the Senate... Omaha Steve Dec 2013 #2
Sorry, that's also FUBAR Demeter Dec 2013 #3
Push the R's hard enough with Obamacare as a success Omaha Steve Dec 2013 #4
Please tell me you aren't that totally unaware of Demeter Dec 2013 #5
You are unaware of all the success stories of Obamacare posted on the DU? Omaha Steve Dec 2013 #6
Getting insurance is not the goal, nor is it a sign of any kind of success Demeter Dec 2013 #7
Single-payer is also a lottery ticket. Everyone pays their taxes. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2013 #8
Single Payer is socializing the costs, and wringing out the profiteering Demeter Dec 2013 #9
Mandated insurance christx30 Dec 2013 #10

Omaha Steve

(99,639 posts)
2. IF Obama had had 60 votes in the Senate...
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 10:10 PM
Dec 2013

We could have had single payer. Be glad we got this first step on the way to single payer accomplished!

OS

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
3. Sorry, that's also FUBAR
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 10:12 PM
Dec 2013

The only way this is a first step is that it sends the economy over a fiscal cliff, and they HAVE to put in USP to save their asses.

Omaha Steve

(99,639 posts)
6. You are unaware of all the success stories of Obamacare posted on the DU?
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 10:26 PM
Dec 2013

Some people have health insurance for the first time. That is success. No more previous conditions, coverage of children until they are 26, etc... It is a win!

OS

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
7. Getting insurance is not the goal, nor is it a sign of any kind of success
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 10:41 PM
Dec 2013

Getting HEALTH CARE is.

After spending thousands on insurance premiums, deductibles, and copays, these people will be no better off. Many will be worse off. And the Bankruptcies will continue.

Insurance is a lottery ticket--the only way you win is by losing your health.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
8. Single-payer is also a lottery ticket. Everyone pays their taxes.
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 09:58 AM
Dec 2013

And if you lose your health, you win. Financially. I'd prefer losing that lottery.

The only difference is Single-payer cuts out the Insurance Companies, so more money can go into actual health care.

Insurance company execs will fight it with huge donations to a corrupt Congress. Just like they did with Medicare Part D.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
9. Single Payer is socializing the costs, and wringing out the profiteering
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 10:00 AM
Dec 2013

and we all benefit from a healthy population.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
10. Mandated insurance
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:49 PM
Dec 2013

is being forced to gamble. If you don't get sick, you lose. If you do get sick, as long as you happen to have the $5000 deductable, you get to collect your winnings. And by winnings, I mean you won't go bankrupt from medical bills.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Reversal on ACA cancellat...