Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,993 posts)
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 01:30 PM Oct 2013

Dems to GOP: No more extortion. No more extortion. No more extortion.

Source: Washington Post

Reports are dribbling out about a possible offer House Republicans are floating to get out of the crisis. The Associated Press reports they are suggesting funding of the government plus a temporary debt limit hike, in exchange for easing the sequester by replacing it with entitlement cuts.

-snip-

A Senate Democratic leadership aide tells me Dems aren’t prepared to comment directly on the House GOP offer — because details involving things such as duration are unclear — but reiterated to me that the general framework underlying the offer is still not acceptable.

“What we don’t want to do is give away any policy concessions now, if part of the deal is having a second phase of negotiations,” the aide tells me. “If they are offering a six week thing, or a couple of months, we’re not going to give them policy concessions so they can seek more during a second phase of negotiation.”

The aide described the Dem principle as follows: “Is this deal a stopgap? Or will it take the CR and debt ceiling off the table for a year or so? We can have a negotiation, but we can’t have it be backstopped by the threat of default later.”

-snip-

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/10/11/dems-to-gop-no-more-extortion-no-more-extortion-no-more-extortion/

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dems to GOP: No more extortion. No more extortion. No more extortion. (Original Post) highplainsdem Oct 2013 OP
How is 'replacing the sequester with entitlement cuts' a concession? Wounded Bear Oct 2013 #1
Exactly wryter2000 Oct 2013 #22
Well, slap my butt and call me Wanda... ejbr Oct 2013 #2
I love your phraseology Liberalynn Oct 2013 #4
Yet when it comes to present day Dems ejbr Oct 2013 #13
Believe me I am praying Liberalynn Oct 2013 #14
+1 2naSalit Oct 2013 #17
OK Wanda you asked for it..... Rebellious Republican Oct 2013 #6
!!! ejbr Oct 2013 #11
Oh! 2naSalit Oct 2013 #18
I am ass-uming that you are ok with the ass slap then? Rebellious Republican Oct 2013 #29
NOT AT ALL 2naSalit Oct 2013 #30
My apologies for offending you, wanted to do this publicly here, not in a PM. Rebellious Republican Oct 2013 #31
Thanks 2naSalit Oct 2013 #32
LOVE IT, ejbr! That's exactly what's going on here. calimary Oct 2013 #9
The latest that I remember ejbr Oct 2013 #12
Yeah, we all remember that one. Once again, we proved correct, and once again, he proved calimary Oct 2013 #25
Shoot it down and shut them up ASAP. jsr Oct 2013 #3
"entitlement cuts" = SS & Medicare True_Blue Oct 2013 #5
I agree Liberalynn Oct 2013 #7
When they want Social Security and/or Medicare cuts, counter with lifting the cap and expanding them RC Oct 2013 #19
Sequestration is sealed, list of new demands Southside Oct 2013 #8
Start with corporate welfare Andy823 Oct 2013 #10
This is not the time or place Marthe48 Oct 2013 #15
No more extortion after our next concession. Orsino Oct 2013 #16
It really would help vlakitti Oct 2013 #20
Time for some Dear John Coyotl Oct 2013 #21
Kick and R Iliyah Oct 2013 #23
legislating from the trench cvoogt Oct 2013 #24
Have Mercy these Fuckers don't take a hint Heather MC Oct 2013 #26
No! nt Buddaman Oct 2013 #27
I'm finding it absolutely insane Nite Owl Oct 2013 #28

Wounded Bear

(58,662 posts)
1. How is 'replacing the sequester with entitlement cuts' a concession?
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 01:32 PM
Oct 2013

That's just making them permanent.

The deal is already on the table. Sign it and let's move on.

wryter2000

(46,051 posts)
22. Exactly
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 03:27 PM
Oct 2013

That was what they wanted to begin with...unlimited money for the Pentagon and cutting the social safety net.

ejbr

(5,856 posts)
2. Well, slap my butt and call me Wanda...
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 01:33 PM
Oct 2013

Are the Dems no longer being Charlie Brown trying to kick Lucy's football? Let us pray.

 

Liberalynn

(7,549 posts)
4. I love your phraseology
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 01:38 PM
Oct 2013
and agree with the sentiment whole heartedly.



I like the backbone so far Dems just keep standing straight, no bending backward now.

2naSalit

(86,636 posts)
30. NOT AT ALL
Sat Oct 12, 2013, 04:56 PM
Oct 2013

That would be the main reason for an adverse response, the pie thing would be secondary... A pie in the face isn't a hanging offense, the ass-slap... absolutely, especially when used for this purpose though any ass-slap is offensive in my reckoning.

 

Rebellious Republican

(5,029 posts)
31. My apologies for offending you, wanted to do this publicly here, not in a PM.
Sat Oct 12, 2013, 05:03 PM
Oct 2013

Sincerely do apologize 2nasality.

2naSalit

(86,636 posts)
32. Thanks
Sat Oct 12, 2013, 05:16 PM
Oct 2013

accepted.

I just think it's important to call out sexist acts that are just plain out of line, women deserve more respect than they are generally afforded.

calimary

(81,298 posts)
9. LOVE IT, ejbr! That's exactly what's going on here.
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 01:51 PM
Oct 2013

Many of us here have complained, FOR YEARS by now, that the Dems were just being Charlie Brown again and again and again, and NEVER learning. Always remaining naive. Always expecting better of these schmucks than they were willing or able to become. Always giving them the benefit of the doubt. Always giving. Always giving something up. Always conceding something. NEVER standing for anything - much less what We The People believe in vast - and increasing - majorities. It's about damn time they realize who they're dealing with.

These are scorpions. They keep demanding rides on our backs across the river. Sometimes they even promise they won't sting. And trusting them ALWAYS winds up with a bad result. They can't help it, though. They're scorpions. But WE CAN help it, by recognizing what they are, how they can NEVER be trusted, and how firmly they need to be handled - PERIOD.

NO compromise. NONE. Put the extortion guns away. Shut the fuck up with your "demands." ONLY THEN might we have something to talk about.

ejbr

(5,856 posts)
12. The latest that I remember
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 02:03 PM
Oct 2013

is Harry Reid caving on reforming the filibuster rules, believing Bitch McConnell's assurances...AGAIN...WTF?!

calimary

(81,298 posts)
25. Yeah, we all remember that one. Once again, we proved correct, and once again, he proved
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 04:27 PM
Oct 2013

wrong as can be - trusting him. You trust the scorpion and give him a ride across the river, and it's GUARANTEED he'll still sting you in the back and then you get to drown. He doesn't even care that he might go down with you. He's a scorpion. So what he knows is strictly about stinging. I hope Harry Reid finally gets it. I hope Nancy Pelosi does, too. She's quoted in news stories featured in other threads here as saying we've been enablers and that has to stop. And it's true. That HAS TO stop.

 

Liberalynn

(7,549 posts)
7. I agree
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 01:47 PM
Oct 2013

these shouldn't be granted under any circumstances. Dems should say on SS we are willing to raise the cap, that's the offer, it is a reform take it or leave it.

The Pukes chose to use whatever political capital they once had by acting like spoiled rotten greedy asses. That was their choice. If they expect Dems to get them out of the corner they backed themselves into it should be on Den terms alone.

Probably not going to happen that way, but it should happen that way.

 

RC

(25,592 posts)
19. When they want Social Security and/or Medicare cuts, counter with lifting the cap and expanding them
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 03:04 PM
Oct 2013

Lets the American people know who's where.

Southside

(338 posts)
8. Sequestration is sealed, list of new demands
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 01:47 PM
Oct 2013

They have been plotting on us for years, sequestration was just the start.

Kibbe FreedomWorks CEO and TEA Party brain said

"As far as I'm concerned the sequester is something that is already an agreement that's sealed. I don't see any reason to reopen that. I'd be all for tax simplification and going after all the junk in the tax code, but I don't think I would trade it for the sequester. I would trade it for something meaningful like increasing the debt ceiling," Kibbe said. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/02/freedomworks-debt-limit_n_4033156.html

They want more progress at every budget deadline, every deficit deadline, they will shrink the safety net until everyone in need drops.

I don't know how Obama stops this, but I am thankful that he is pushing back. Policy wise they should like Obama, he is willing to give so much, to preserve ObamaCare.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
10. Start with corporate welfare
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 01:53 PM
Oct 2013

Why is it that when republicans talk about entitlement cuts they never mention all the "corporate welfare", like subsidies and tax cuts for the oil companies who make "BILLIONS" in profits every year. And how about the corporate farmers who make millions in subsidies, yet never set foot on a farm? Start taking away those kinds of "entitlements" not those who help those who are in real need of help.

Marthe48

(16,963 posts)
15. This is not the time or place
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 02:09 PM
Oct 2013

Right now: Open the government, debt ceiling to end of 2014. That's all you get, you cheap extortionists.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
16. No more extortion after our next concession.
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 02:10 PM
Oct 2013

And this time we mean it!

This leak is exactly how we negotiate with ourselves.

vlakitti

(401 posts)
20. It really would help
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 03:16 PM
Oct 2013

if the media reportage about "deals"-in-the-making and such like were not all speculative or based on rumors from unidentified Republicans.

My girlfriend watched Rachel Maddow last evening and said she had a whole segment on totally crappy bigfoot media reportage.

cvoogt

(949 posts)
24. legislating from the trench
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 04:25 PM
Oct 2013

somehow the Repubs seem OK with forcing legislation while pointing a Howitzer at our economy, but activist judges are somehow 'legislating from the bench'. The methods employed by the Repubs' shutdown are extra-legal. And no, trolls, that doesn't mean it is 'even more' legal than normal.

 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
26. Have Mercy these Fuckers don't take a hint
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 04:33 PM
Oct 2013

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Just do your dayum Job, Vote on the Budget you agreed to which is a piss poor compromise on the Dems part.

I think everytime they make a stuid Offer Dems should counter with a better

Offer instead of just rejecting the stupid offer

Example
No to Social Security and Medicare cuts

But we will agree to cut Defense Spending by 10% and Create a Single Payer System for the ACA

Nite Owl

(11,303 posts)
28. I'm finding it absolutely insane
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 05:01 PM
Oct 2013

That it is always our programs to be cut.
They have to make cuts or raise taxes to at least match what our side makes. Social Security ----off the table!
They actually should be making all the cuts, we've suffered enough.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems to GOP: No more exto...