White House Issues Veto Threat Over GOP's New 'Supercommittee'
Source: Talking Points Memo
The White House on Tuesday issued a veto threat over a new Republican proposal that would bring back the supercommittee: a bicameral, bipartisan committee to hash out a deal to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for spending reforms, similar to a group created by the 2011 Budget Control Act that failed to craft a long-term deficit reduction deal.
"The Administration strongly opposes House joint passage of H.J. Res. 89 and H.R. 3273, which does nothing to solve the immediate, pressing obligations the Congress has to open the Government and pay its bills," read a statement from the Office of Management and Budget.
-snip-
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/white-house-issues-veto-threat-over-gop-s-new-supercommittee
kevinbgoode1
(153 posts)be sent to the Koch Bros. for payment until the government is reopened and the debt ceiling raised. If the Kochs want to play that they should be running the government, perhaps it is time for the American people to make them pay the bills for a change.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)#GOPshutdown
Google " #GOPshutdown" and click images.
Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)THEY broke it, they pay for it!!
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)It's BA-A-ACK!
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)then bury the shove you used to bury the Supercommittee idea.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Just make them do their job and fund the bills they have already passed.
bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)by GOP rules
Make lots of patriotic and reasonable noise
Promise the other side to negotiate
Show how flexible you are
Constantly vacillate between flexibility and rigidity
Keep front and center with the media
Have no intention of doing anything of what you say unless cornered
Blame the other side
Move the goal posts if you're not getting what you want
____________________
That's what it boils down to, 2 sides coming from opposite ends
One wants to avoid default
The other wants to default and blame the other
So the victor will be the side that convinces the public and the media
that they are right on this issue
Obama is on the right side, and the public knows it
___________________
I talked with a guy last weekend who swears this is the END of the GOP
I know we've all read this elsewhere on line, but this guy had his independent
spin on it, and I doubt he read much at all. The party of money can't buy
everything, but they won't go out with a whimper, he said.
Southside
(338 posts)Just read a transcript of today's session on cspan. 2 hours spent on one minute rants about the tea party shutdown. Then passing a piece meal legislation to fund Head Start I believe. If this was my job and we stood around talking about getting back to work, I would fire myself.
They were right to suspend their pay. They should suspend the Tea Party members and bring this to a vote. They tried to leech more from Obama, he swatted them off, now go suck somewhere else.
Uncle Joe
(58,364 posts)Thanks for the thread, highplainsdem.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)and we got the *lovely* "sequester" out of the first "Super Committee". I'm scared to know what we would get out of another failed one. *ugh*
We already have a "Super Committee". It's called Congress and we don't need anything other than for some of its members to do their constitutionally designated jobs- which don't include government shutdowns, debts defaults, partial funding bills, etc.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)NEVER negotiate with terrorists or hostage takers. EVER.
AAO
(3,300 posts)He would be a hero for doing so. If he has to be the last defender of the constitution, he has to act accordingly.
They could impeach him, but he'd never be convicted.
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)but I really want to know. Why can't she stand up as minority leader and bring up a bill for a vote? What would happen?
Is only one person in the Country permitted to bring up a bill to vote on in the House?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)robinlynne
(15,481 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)robinlynne
(15,481 posts)To speak, members must seek the presiding officer's recognition. The presiding officer may call on members as they please, and may therefore control the flow of debate. The presiding officer also rules on all points of order but such rulings may be appealed to the whole House.
Wondering how this appeal process happens. I'm sure greater minds than mine have gone through these scenarios. the truth is it is ridiuclous that one person, one single person, controls Congress. At the same time, don't know if moderate Rs would have the courage to amke a vote happen, but I bet they could.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Unfortunately, moderate Republicans do not exist.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)I think this lunacy ends when a group of rational republicans realize that the party is truly dead and break ranks. Net effect, the thugs lose the house and spiral into the void.
Southside
(338 posts)Tea Party caucus goes ballistic on the GOP for acting in the best interests of the nation. Moderate republicans faithful to Boehner, I guess a hard 100 to 125, pull further away from the Tea party and try to move pass ObamaCare. Boehmer loses his control over the entire 220.
demwing
(16,916 posts)but anyone can be the speaker. The speaker doesn't have to come from the majority party, and doesn't even have to be a member of congress.
BumRushDaShow
(129,062 posts)iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)The sane ones have to be sweating about now because they see the big picture
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Mr. President, we have got them on the run ... now keep up, arrest, put handcuffs on them and throw them in the pokey until they submit and pass a clean CR.
Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)Igel
(35,317 posts)that the president's job is to sign bills, so what's he doing threatening to not do his job?
Simplistic reductionist thinking has never daunted the intellectual capacity of the American voter. The more simplistic and reductionist, the more they revel in the challenge.
Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)They are going to counter with anything and everything, the bigger lie the better, so no use really in not at least asking for the MAX that we'd want and negotiating back from there.
LaPera
(6,486 posts)cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)if no agreement is reached and then will just sabotage the committee so the cuts go into place for social programs yet anything like military cuts they will not follow through on just like they did before.