Obama: Social Security Checks Will Stop When Debt Ceiling Is Reached
Source: Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama said Thursday that while it's bad members of Congress have allowed a government shutdown, it would be worse if they failed to increase the government's borrowing authority later this month.
First and foremost, he said, retirement and disability benefits for millions of Americans would be at risk.
"In a government shutdown, Social Security checks still go out on time," Obama said. "In an economic shutdown, if we don't raise the debt ceiling, they don't go out on time."
More than 57 million Americans receive monthly benefits from the Social Security Administration. The average monthly check for retirees totaled $1,224 in September.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/03/social-security-debt-ceiling_n_4037870.html
dgibby
(9,474 posts)CarrieLynne
(497 posts)...and he was supposed to go to Drill this weekend but due to the shut down he will not be going and wont be getting paid for it either....he was looking forward to that extra money since he is only working part time for $10 an hour....
I was looking forward to that extra little bit of back rent as well LOL
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)that`s really supporting the troops isn't it.
CarrieLynne
(497 posts)so hes had a hard time finding work - hard to make his very accomplished and decorated Army Infantry resume into something civilians understand...
between him and my hubby - its clear that military training doesnt translate over to civilian life quite as much as they tell you when you sign up lol
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)don't know or love someone getting a check from the SSA. To take it further, the loss of income/financial security will have to be filled in by the family or friend's savings accounts and ripples out to supercede other plans, investments, retirement etc.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)is that so many teabaggers are on SS, yet these same teabaggers are the ones pleading with the Republicans to shut down the government and not raise the debt ceiling.
There is a serious disconnect and much of it can be traced back to Fox News, Drudge Report and Rush Limbaugh.
They've been thoroughly brainwashed. Meanwhile people like Rush are making millions off this brainwashing.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Keep your government hand offa my Medicare!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)now the live media coverage...at some point even Fox will have to start caving. I'm so glad PBO is holding firm and getting more and more in their political face.
I wish that someone would get Reid's "permission" to do a real Educational Presentation, equal time so to speak, on the House floor to explain, show graphics, phone numbers, have local helpers/organizations submit contact information. Just promise not to read Green Eggs and Ham. LOL
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)parents and uncle have been happily rooting for more cuts than the sequester and are happy about the shutdown. Wonder if they'll change their tune if their social security checks stop?
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)so I'm fucked if these stupid assholes don't get a brain between now and the 17th.. I'll be praying the Republicans figure this out...
pangaia
(24,324 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)although the knuckle draggers will blame obama the rest of us know who to blame.
this will be settled long before the checks go out.
Paladin
(28,262 posts)I don't think even Ted Cruz is stupid and self-possessed enough to risk this happening.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)This the Republican Shutdown of government under the control of Boehner who will not (yet) allow a clean vote on the Continuing Resolution for Congress to pay the bills they have already approved and spent.
Boehner won't allow a clean vote because it would pass in an instant.
Thus it is Boehner and the Republican caucus who back him who are responsible.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)"I have already made this paper too long, for which I must crave pardon, not having now time to make it shorter." -- Ben Franklin
He (perhaps indirectly) took it from Pascal the French philosopher and mathematician who wrote:
"Je nai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je nai pas eu le loisir de la faire plus courte." -- Blaise Pascal
which would translate as
"I have made this longer than usual because I have not had time (or leisure) to make it shorter."
http://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/04/28/shorter-letter/
I like to follow this guideline from a famous American author, where "mint" would be the metaphor of a coin factory that mints coins:
"The greatest possible mint of style is to make the words absolutely disappear into the thought." -- Nathaniel Hawthorne
In short:
"Brevity is the mint of style."
ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
Anyone who follows my postings here may have noted they are not elongated, jammed together sentences that fill the screen.
I find it difficult, and sometimes annoying to try to read screen after screen of text, even when I am really interested in the subject/topic.
With this in mind, I tend to make my paragraphs shorter as my post/reply unfolds.
Lots of spaces, so easier to read imo.
"Brevity is the mint of style."
yep
CC
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)If this OP from last week is correct, then there should be no delay in checks going out regardless of the debt ceiling showdown.
So which is right?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023712142
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The Social Security trust fund buys US government debt. It uses Social Security taxes and the interest from those bonds to send out checks.
If the debt limit is hit, the federal government can't pay interest on those bonds. With no interest, there is not enough money to send out the checks.
And there is no mechanism by which the Social Security administration can prioritize the checks. Nor is there a mechanism for them to send "partial" payments covered by Social Security taxes.
So while Social Security doesn't make the Federal deficit worse, it would be stopped by the debt limit.
Angleae
(4,484 posts)Otherwise it wouldn't be able to purchase more bonds. The interest earned on those bonds is minimal.
7962
(11,841 posts)So unless we're both wrong, and I dont think we are, then the President just showed he's not above playing the fear game either. I hate it, but it seems to happen more and more. The fact that the GOP does it is no excuse to do the same thing. But just the mention of SS scares people, so there it is.
Angleae
(4,484 posts)Non-essential federal employees are furloughed and on their way out the turned off the lights and computers.
7962
(11,841 posts)saying that the checks wouldnt go out if the debt ceiling wasn't raised. If what you say is correct, then checks wouldnt be going out NOW, and they are. He even says that in the OP. Well, direct deposit, i dont think they actually send paper checks anymore. He's not being honest; its just fear mongering. Tit-for-tat I guess. Par for the course in Washington.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)on the third Wednesday of this month, which is the 16th.
7962
(11,841 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)and now it's SS. What else is his fault?
7962
(11,841 posts)As I've said in other posts, I don't like my Pres/Rep/Senator dropping to the level of the stupid crap that the GOP does. It's so easy to spot it. Let THEM make fools of themselves, as they usually do. I'm not going to just blindly sit by and watch just because its my side doing the misleading. Either what he said in the OP is wrong, or what most people here think about the SS fund is wrong. Which is it?
Social Security sends out more than it receives in tax receipts. It's currently able to buy more bonds only because of the interest on the bonds it already owns.
7962
(11,841 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)It's "in the red" counting only tax receipts.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)who collect the taxes and send out the checks will be out of work. Because the Treasury will not be paying interest on SS debt anymore than it will be paying any other debt obligation.
Lasher
(27,597 posts)I need to think about this. Exactly what spending would continue, and would payroll tax revenue be diverted from Social Security to cover other costs? I hope it would not. But if so, this would backfire on Obama. I'll be watching for more about this.
7962
(11,841 posts)There's just IOU's (special issue bonds). So everyone who insulted me for saying it should read THIS op. And learn just where our money does go.
Lasher
(27,597 posts)It's all just IOUs. And not even on paper. Your bank might honor those IOUs. Might not. For that matter, money is just an IOU. If nobody will redeem your dollar bills, they're good to light cigars with and that's about it.
Why do you single out the Social Security trust fund to define it as IOUs?
7962
(11,841 posts)The bonds have to be redeemed en masse in the future. With tax dollars. They're not the same. If they were, there would never be any talk of "redemption". I can buy a car with a sack full of cash. If I give the dealer a govt bond, he'll turn me away. If everyone wants to equate special bonds in the SS fund with the "money" in your checking account, then the game is already over and we're all screwed. Don't know how old you are, but I'm 52 and assuming I live as long as my parents, I'll be around to watch this train wreck.
Why raise anybody's taxes? Its all IOUs anyway, right? Why send anyone a tax refund check? Just send them an IOU! Lets just raise the debt limit to 100 trillion, since its all just fake! Then we wouldnt have to go through this again till Hillary's SECOND term.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)The fund uses income from SS taxes and interest payments to send out checks.
If there are no interest payments, then there's not enough money to honor the SS recipients.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)IE, you had the money, and you handed it to someone for safekeeping, and now expect them to save it back. Only real difference is we handed it to the US government, instead of a bank.
The lockbox idea doesn't look like such a bad idea sometimes, in comparison to the "lets hand it over to republicans and let them do whatever they want with it" plan that they actually went with.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)I doubt they thought of that possibility. Oh I forgot, that isn't an entitlement, they paid into it all these years. Of course they draw out tons more than they put in, but hey the truth doesn't matter to that group.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)And somehow, it will all be Obama's fault.
Worried senior
(1,328 posts)and there is no way we could live without our SS, that is our income. I might be able to borrow a month's worth of bills from our daughter but that would be it and leaves us with another bill to be paid back.
I want PBO to stay strong but I am terribly worried about this as are many others.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Make light of how much SS is needed. My point is most of the TPs are SS age and hate the govt. I want the safety net but the people they elect do note want it and do not care if it goes away.
I hope this works itself out too or we will have to help
Mother in law for sure.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)One aspect for consideration.. This particular "showdown" is supposedly about trying to prevent the Obamacare legislation from being enacted.
But if the Republicans walk away from this believing that it is a winning strategy, the next time it will be something else. SNAP benefits will surely be taken up. They can do this every year or two, and will if they think it will enable their destructive goals. It would be shocking if medicare and Medicaid both did not receive the same treatment. And eventually, the SS program itself. They have made their intent to kill all of these programs clear for a great many years.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)
Purveyor This message was self-deleted by its author.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)and as for people who are on Social Security, or Military Disability, nothing for them. If they want money, they should
pull themselves up by their own bootstraps just like their rich Daddies did. This is their hatred of programs like this, because all those people should just go out and "Get a job!" Even if you lost both legs and arms in a war.. which rich Republicans refused to go fight.
Republicans bastards.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Welcome to DU
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I have been paying into SS a majority of my life and I am ENTITLED to that money.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)sometimes two or three would they consider not collecting their SS checks...they look at you horrified...of course not, I earned it.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)They hug their wallets and say "MINE!! mine!!"
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)loans, subsidies, tax breaks...surely I missed a few.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)But, something I never understood- How can one 'pull oneself up by one's own bootstraps? Think about it. It I am standing on the ground, wearing boots, and I pull up on the straps (assuming my boots even have straps) I can not lift myself off the ground.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)its an Americanism .. something someone thought up .. maybe I can use Wikipedia to find out.. so many phrases taken for granted these days..its often good to question them.
here :
Meaning
Improve your situation by your own efforts.
Origin
The origin of this descriptive phrase isn't known. It refers of course to boots and their straps (laces) and to the imagined feat of a lifting oneself off the ground by pulling on one's bootstraps. This impossible task is supposed to exemplify the achievement in getting out of a difficult situation by one's own efforts.
It was known by the early 20th century. James Joyce alluded to it in Ulysses, 1922:
"There were others who had forced their way to the top from the lowest rung by the aid of their bootstraps."
A more explicit use of the phrase comes a little later, from Kunitz & Haycraft's British Authors of the 19th Century:
"A poet who lifted himself by his own boot-straps from an obscure versifier to the ranks of real poetry."
Some early computers used a process called bootstrapping which alludes to this phrase. This involved loading a small amount of code which was then used to progressively load more complex code until the machine was ready for use. This has led to use of the term 'booting' to mean starting up a computer.
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/290800.html
pangaia
(24,324 posts)all that trouble.
But thanks. I actually am familiar with the Joyce use, but that was it.
The most interesting thing to me is how the phrase morphed into booting up a computer.
I will never be able to hit the power button, er boot button, again without thinking about that.
Cheers..
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Nihongo ga sukoshi wakarimasu. :> )
Years ago I was, not fluent, but could get around Japan, carry on good conversations, read enough to find the sushi bars, get on the right trains, etc..
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)mainly this mean "me, too" (polite form)
ex. When someone says to you, "thank you-
'arigatou' (in Japanese), you could say 'kochira koso' instead of saying dou itashimashite (you're welcome), it has the same meaning of 'the pleasure is mine,' under the situation
pangaia
(24,324 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Just in case ...
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)I have a few thousand in savings, but that would only last me for about 3 months.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)why not send it out?
Igel
(35,317 posts)The money is not there in the trust fund. They're bonds.
What's interesting is what's missing.
Those who insist that the SS trust fund bonds are public debt. That would be the first priority in paying out from current receipts.
However we have this idea that any debt by the government must be "public debt", as though when the guy getting a car filled with gas is equivalent to an interest-bearing public bond issued under Congressional authority. Confuse the two kinds of debt and you get the idea that spending can't be prioritized.
If an office has the budget to buy $1200 in paper this month for printing its newsletter and it's needed for the interest that's going to help pay for the SS checks this month, well, they're equally "public debt."
If it's possible to pay 1 million and 3 SS benefits but there's not money for the last 1000, it's better not to pay any.
We've been down this path before. Paying something on time now to avoid late fees when in two weeks you know you'll need the money for something else much more important. And begging that one's hands are tied because the authority wasn't explicitly given--and, if passed in a bill, would be vetoed--by Congress.
The idea is that it's better to make the situation worse because if it gets bad enough and enough suffer, then maybe it'll get better. Both want to win more than to do good--because both are convinced that if the other guy gets his way, it'll be worse.
Sad, really. It's been rotten for a long time, though. It's like an apple. There may be bruises, but what really ruins the apple is the rot from the core.
Cha
(297,273 posts)now!
Thanks Cali
freshwest
(53,661 posts)and economic collapse for many millions of Americans from which, I dare say, they will NFVER be able to recover from. That is the intent. The Death Panel is the Tea Party, They worship Ayn Rand and want to do away with minorities, the poor, etc.
I've been hearing their rhetoric full-blown for over a decade. They are loving this. Too many of them have already made their fortunes and moved out of the country, or out in the rural areas, and have armed themselves to shoot to kill when they say others will be looking for food.
This is not the circles most people at DU are familiar with. I try to avoid them. This is not a joke for them, they have arranged their entire lives around this. And the GOP knows that the people on SS cannot get out in the street, and can't hold out, and can't lobby. To them, they are the refuse of society who need to go for their vision of the future.
There is a great difference between a government shut down and the debt ceilling not being raised. It will cancel out all social programs, and the GOP is determined to allow the equality of the ACA to make a difference and lift people up.
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
in the long run.
I DO believe that the situation in the USA for its citizens will not improve greatly until there is a UNITED uprising from "We The People" to make their governments RESPONSIBLE to the people.
I believe that Barack Obama is doing the best he can possibly do without getting his head blown off.
JFK bucked the MIC et al gang too overtly - we know what happened there . . .
I remember the day, was in Grade 8 history class at the time -
My teacher wept openly.
I choked up - was well informed at the time about what was happening - had previously done a class "presentation" on the "Cuban Missile Crisis" - and how John F. Kennedy had prevented a war.
I guess me being a "ConcernedCanuk" started long ago - it just hit me . . . hmmmmm . . .
If voters would only spend more time educating themselves on their representatives, getting to know their rights -
heck, I don't know much about in the USA about Welfare/Social Assistance, but up here
- some of us on Welfare know more about laws/regulations/entitlements and so on BECAUSE WE NEED TO TO SURVIVE!!
USA ain't the only country that needs it's voters to become INFORMED voters.
Making one's decisions on what we see on the tube, internet or newspapers -
That ain't good enough.
Us Canucks need to educate ourselves, and PARTICIPATE so we can prevent people like our Harperslut running roughshod over us and our country.
I suppose we won't do much about him or his ilk unless we REALLY feel some discomfort.
Old saying - "In crisis, there is opportunity".
If people in the USA start suffering severely by the tens of thousands because of the "shutdown", -
there may be motivation by the people to make REAL change,
hopefully preventing people like Obama from being hogtied from ruling by the MIC/Big Oil/Big Pharma et al.
Hopefully . . . .
CC
walkerbait41
(302 posts)On Oct.17 we may not get our S.S. What we want is for Pres. Obama and the Dems. to stand strong and not give into the tea-bagging first cousin marring PUKES.