Tesla stock tumbles after Model S catches fire
Source: AP
Shares of electric car company Tesla sank more than 6 percent Wednesday after an Internet video showed flames spewing from one of the company's vehicles near Seattle.
Shares of Tesla Motors Inc. fell $12.05 to $180.95 the stock's biggest one-day decline since July 16.
The incident happened Tuesday after 8 a.m. as the driver was traveling southbound on state Route 167 through Kent, said Trooper Chris Webb of the Washington State Patrol. The driver stated that he believed he had struck some metal debris on the freeway, so he exited the highway and the vehicle became disabled.
The driver told authorities he began to smell something burning and then the vehicle caught fire. Firefighters needed several attempts to extinguish the flames because the blaze kept reigniting, Webb said. A trooper who responded to the scene was unable to locate any objects on the roadway, but Department of Transportation workers did observe some debris near the scene.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/tesla-stock-tumbles-model-catches-fire-210456370--finance.html
longship
(40,416 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)which can't be extinguished until you disconnect the power flow. This is going to get a lot of attention, out of context attention I am sure.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Lithium Ion gets annoyed when exposed to atmosphere. Something must have punctured a battery cell.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It does seem this caused the fire.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)If so, great energy density but some runaway heat concerns.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)No.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Sure, this fire may very well caused by a short caused by the damage, resulting in the batteries cooking off in a thermal runaway.
But at the same time, the vast majority of us drive around in vehicles powered by explosive liquid that itself is a nasty fire hazard. I have personally seen a vehicle get destroyed by a fire that was exacerbated by fuel, and every fire department in the country is always prepared to deal with vehicle fires that are made worse by the presence of several gallons of highly flammable fuel.
Is this embarrassing for Tesla? A little. Does this mean that the Tesla S or any other car is suddenly too dangerous to use? Not when compared with gasoline or diesel powered vehicles. Not by a longshot.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Car fires get NASTY very quick because of the abundance of fuel (gasoline, oil, transmission fluid, plastic, rubber tires, etc).
If you don't smother it fast, it is a conflagration in about 90 seconds.
An electrical fire though, is a bit trickier and harder to extinguish on a car carrying that much battery.
The accident reconstruction should be illuminating. I would guess Tesla will have engineers inspecting the car by tomorrow morning. I doubt you would ever see a Detroit car maker do that.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Conventional vehicles are very, very, far from being immune to electrical/battery fires.
I got a kick out of watching Walt destroy the Bimmer belonging to a douchebag lawyer by shorting out its battery with a wet squeegee.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... gasoline fires.
This is a speed bump, they might have to reinforce the battery cage and make it less vulnerable to road-debris damage.
Anyone thinking this is the death of Tesla or the electric car is a doofus.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)Another thought: Tesla, as an American-owned company, is more "Detroit" than, say, Chrysler, with its Fiat overlords. Meanwhile, GM does the bulk of its business, and gets all of its profits, from non-North American business. Ford is not far behind.
"Detroit" is a tired meme way past its sell date.
rwsanders
(2,603 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 3, 2013, 12:07 AM - Edit history (1)
And there is a lot of R&D that will likely yield a better, safer battery in the near future. The pentagon sees it and has invested a lot in research into better batteries and alternate energies.
From what I understand the army's current bid for a replacement for the hummer calls for a hybrid.
My wife and I have a small sailboat and I sold her on the idea of buying it with an electric motor. I told her the motor was one component and batteries could be changed as the technology improves. She loves it. Quiet, reliable, as fast as a diesel, and the boat handles better because we have all the torque we want at low rpms.
We don't really have investments, but I was actually hoping the stock had taken a bigger tumble. I just finished watching "Revenge of the Electric Car" and would have considered buying some if it had dropped to the $15-20 range.
Orrex
(63,213 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)NickB79
(19,246 posts)In a Cracker Barrel parking lot. Fire department was just pulling up as I passed, but that thing was just billowing black smoke.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)Heck, I saw a Police car on fire on my birthday one year.
W T F
(1,147 posts)With this
Rain Mcloud
(812 posts)The motor and controller is under the rear of the car and the battery pack is under the passenger compartment.
According to AutoBlog Green the driver hit some debris in the road which the vehicle detected and instructed the driver to pull over and stop.
The fire did not enter the passenger compartment.
The scenarios that i can figure is that the debris was flammable and either the collision ignited it if unstable enough or the collision ruptured the alleged container and heat generated by the front braking components ignited the contents.
The other explanations would be malicious in nature or fraudulent.
Vehicles burn every day of the year,but an electric car on fire is suddenly news.
[link:https://www.nfpa.org/safety-information/for-consumers/vehicles|
Rain Mcloud
(812 posts)here is a link to more info at ABG,i hope
[link:http://www.autoblog.com/2013/10/03/tesla-says-model-s-fire-started-in-li-ion-battery-share-prices/|
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)That would most likely cause a thermal runaway, resulting in a fire.
Sounds to me like a freak accident - the piece of debris the guy ran over must have been substantial.
And it looks like the car's safety systems worked - it detected something was wrong, told the guy to pull over, so the driver escaped the fire.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)They are gorgeous.
Unless there is a pattern, which I doubt, one off events like this are not significant.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)marble falls
(57,097 posts)Fortunately gas engines never catch fire, nor do gas tanks, gas lines, or just generally gasoline.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Move billions on the markets!!! HURRY!!!
Electric car involved in non-fatal accident!!! LIBERALS DID IT!!! SOLYNDRA!!!
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)I'm in for the long haul!
ripcord
(5,404 posts)The firefighters had to jack up the front of the car and use a saw to get to the battery pack, I hope they get ahead of this quickly.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Stuart G
(38,427 posts)But, If lots of people buy these cars, then this incident will be long forgotten...
freethought
(2,457 posts)Oh, probably not quite a dozen. A previous poster said it right, this is an overreaction. As I understand it, the car's safety and warning systems worked just as they should have so nobody was even hurt. So, one Tesla Model S has problems after running over debris that may have disrupted the battery pack, and that's out of how many sold so far?
Mother Muckraker
(116 posts)Elon Musk has made several misleading statements which this articles addresses:
http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2013/1102/Tesla-Motors-Model-S-fires-Another-setback-for-electric-cars