Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,991 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:32 PM Feb 2012

One-Fourth of All Super PAC Donations Last Month Came From Just Five People

One-Fourth of All Super PAC Donations Last Month Came From Just Five People
By Dashiell Bennett, The Atlantic Wire
Updated: February 22, 2012 | 11:11 a.m.
February 22, 2012 | 11:10 a.m.

We know how the super PACs have come to dominate the presidential campaign, but a closer look at financial-disclosure numbers shows how just a tiny handful of billionaires are dominating those super PACs. An analysis of January's campaign-disclosure filings reveals that 25 percent of all the money raised for the presidential race that month came from just five donors. That select group gave $19 million to various super PACs, often in support of more than one Republican candidate. Those numbers come from both The Washington Post and USA Today, though neither gives a complete list of those five top donors of 2012.


However, a look at the biggest overall donors reveals who have been the biggest supporters of this whole campaign and the outsized level of support they've provided — and some indication of how they hope the race will play out. The limit on individual contributions that can go directly to a candidate is $2,500, but when giving to a super PAC the sky is the limit. And a handful of wealthy individuals have already crossed the $1 million threshold in giving.

By far the most generous contributor is Harold Simmons of Texas, though he has not played favorites during this election cycle. He gave more than $1 million to Rick Perry's super PAC last year (before he dropped out of the race), threw $500,000 to Newt Gingrich in December, quickly pivoted with a $100,000 check to the pro-Mitt Romney Restore Our Future PAC, then went back to Gingrich with another $500,000 check. Perhaps he got confused by the names of the competing PACs — Restore Our Future (Romney) versus Winning the Future (Gingrich). Or as some have pointed out, anyone giving money to Gingrich at this point is really supporting Romney, since Newt's refusal to quit actually undermines Rick Santorum's chances.

Meanwhile, President Obama's super PAC raised just $59,000 in January, with $50,000 coming from his friend John Rogers, an investor. That will surely change from here on out, however, now that the president has abandoned the idea of avoiding the super PAC influence. If you can't beat them, join them, then beat them at their own game.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/one-fourth-of-all-super-pac-donations-last-month-came-from-just-five-people-20120222

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Justice wanted

(2,657 posts)
1. This should be a frightening fact for all of us to see. Just how much one person can
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:17 PM
Feb 2012

influence an election these days with money.

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
4. This should scare even the 1%. There are more than 5 rich people in this country,
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:38 PM
Feb 2012

but if these SuperPac donations pan out, five rich people are going to get special favors at the expense of the rest of the 1% (since that is where all the money in the US is right now).

We are witnessing feudal war in corporate America, money versus money.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
5. WHY? TO BUY THE ELECTION!!! FEDERAL GOV'T FOR SALE!!!!!
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 10:47 PM
Feb 2012

I have no idea where all of the other DU members are, kpete.
But, I appreciate you putting this article up here.

Along with all of the other articles you put in the news section, of course.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
8. Just an aside but how can we 'Restore Our Future' ? The future hasn't happened yet.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 02:13 AM
Feb 2012

You can't restore something unless it existed sometime in the past.

That rules out the future.

Do these people actually understand the English language or any
language for that matter?
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»One-Fourth of All Super P...