Feds sue anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan over back taxes
An IRS revenue officer said Sheehan refused to answer any questions about her finances after receiving a summons at her Vacaville home.
Sheehan said she's always been up front with the IRS and has no intention of paying her taxes. She says the government has already taken enough from her.
"If they (federal government), can give me my son back, I'll pay my taxes, but that's not going to happen," Sheehan said.
http://www.wtsp.com/news/national/article/240153/81/Anti-war-activist-
Not the smartest fight to pick.
sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)for something you don't believe in.
Tripod
(854 posts)700, finally!
sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)Tripod
(854 posts)"Sweet dreams, and fly tonight"
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...like they say, only two things in life guaranteed, death and taxes...and you don't get to choose between 'em...
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)the idea of waiving taxes for deceased soldiers - for the parents if unmarried or the spouse if married - is noble and a way for this country to express their gratitude, every year.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...
Uncle Joe
(58,362 posts)Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)I specifically said spouses in my post. I don't think the exemption should carry through, generationally.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)It seems like siblings and children can be just as hard hit emotionally as parent if not more. Spouses seem to be the best argument, but they are not paying taxes on the soldiers income at that point.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)OK, maybe up to the 18th birthday it would be reasonable if they exceeded the minimum taxable income...but, after that, I think it would be fair to stop it there. Spouses do pay taxes on their own income, though...and I think it's an easy way for the government to recognize a special benefit that acknowledges his/her loss for the deceased service to this country.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)And kids will pay taxes so why aren't they exempt? If there was a draft then maybe it would be a better argument, but there is not.
If a federal agent, or other federal worker dies while on duty, should their spouses also pay no taxes?
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)If your job description puts you in a likely position to potentially die in service to your country...I think it's reasonable. Already answered your kids question and I don't see what's relevant about a draft that doesn't exist.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)after he dies in combat. That sounds fair.
MADem
(135,425 posts)change. There's also a smaller "death benefit" that will pay for burial, provide the tombstone/marker, etc.
It's not like people who have lost a loved one in wartime are just tossed to the curb with no resources to transition.
Lots here--follow the links: http://www.vba.va.gov/survivors/
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Perhaps Cindy taking this stand could make it an issue. I can't imagine too many Americans opposing that kind of support for the troops. Maybe after all it's a fight the Government might not want to have.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 22, 2012, 07:10 PM - Edit history (1)
Or remarries a businessman who names him/her CEO so he/she can route both their salaries through him/her.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Doesn't it work that way with other benefits available to widows/widowers?
As for becoming a high earning CEO, that too could be considered in the legislation.
But Cindy definitely has a point. They took her son, refused to answer her questions as to why he died, and she cannot get him back. Is there a price on that?
Most other countries do treat their veterans and surviving families much better than they are treated here.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)I'm pretty sure her son signed up. I think he was pretty gung-ho about the military in fact.
24601
(3,962 posts)Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)She's drawing a lot of attention to her anti-war stance and loss of her son again, so I a suspect she knew very well it would come to this eventually.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)n/t
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)taxes for that yr, including not only the dead military person's family, but his/her parents. I wouldn't cause a lot of problems in the gvt and might be a decent thing to do.
I know, the "kid" is an adult so why should his/her parents get a tax break, but just thinking it would be decent.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Or a bribe. I think it sounds kind of cheap and disgusting, as if escaping paying your taxes for a year is compensation for the death of a child. As if that would even the balance sheet. Money, money, money: I thought only Republicans think about it all the time.
Sorry, but in a country with a volunteer army, that is not how things work. Death benefits, yes; parents escaping their taxes, no. We're Democrats: we all pay taxes because we believe in contributing to the common good (and to fixing those things we disagree are contributing to the common good through the democratic system).
Did Cindy Sheehan ever think that by withholding her taxes she harms somebody else's child? I bet she didn't.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)No, I clearly don't agree with anything you suggest.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Another quote of yours: "Money, money, money: I thought only Republicans think about it all the time. "
You are wrong. The unemployed, the underemployed also think about it all the time.
saras
(6,670 posts)girl gone mad
(20,634 posts)bayareaboy
(793 posts)Have Cindy pay the same amount as GE. That would be zero. Besides that they didn't have to give up a son.
dflprincess
(28,078 posts)I wonder how much money GE made off the war her son died in? All parents or spouses of dead soldiers should get GE's negative tax rate.
2banon
(7,321 posts)bayareaboy
(793 posts)I don't really think that has anything to worry about, actually having to pay back taxes though. She probably does not have much funds and there are still lots of folks who stopped paying during the 1960s.
In fact I will bet that it probably isn't very high on her list, payin back the goverment.
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)a multi million dollar corporation pays less in taxes than the CEO makes each year (or gets a huge refund).
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)Cindy, figure out a way to pay your back taxes and then fight for a change to the tax laws where parents who lose children in wars can be exempt from paying taxes.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Can't say I fault her. I have no idea what I would do if my only child was killed by right-wing policies. Shudder.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)it's about the insult to think she should pay them when they sent her son to die in an illegal war, I'll wager.
Good luck Cindy. I think of you, often.
Journeyman
(15,031 posts)snot
(10,529 posts)Journeyman
(15,031 posts)and an Aunt paid his taxes for him the next morning, to avoid scandal to the family name.
But then, he used the occasion as the impetus to write possibly the most explosive political essay of all time, Civil Disobedience, the document that has, so far, set in motion resistance movements from India to the U.S., and countless lands in between.
http://thoreau.eserver.org/civil.html
snot
(10,529 posts)cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)when he tried to get out of paying his taxes.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)which increases their pay. I also think they don't have to pay taxes while they are in a combat zone. They deserve that much from us. I do think we should also pay for the soldiers funeral when they die in combat. The married soldier's family get extended benefits for the rest of the lives or unless they remarry. If the soldier has a family their family members can take advantage of the schooling they offer. I know it helped my sister who went to college. I think the government has done very well by our soldiers in combat. I do wish they would do more for the wounded soldiers who come back as far as health care.
I feel terrible for Mrs Sheehan but I would suggest she pay her taxes or she will lose and be sitting in a jail cell.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)They just don't pay taxes on hazardous duty pay.
By the way, bush was doing audits of military members taxes when he was in office. I know, I was auditted while I was in the Navy. But the IRS ended up owing me money.
Yes, she will end up in jail but NOT because our laws are fair and equitable. Only in this America can a corporation pay absolutely zero taxes, get a tax subsidy, give up nothing, make billions and encourage war-mongers, while a dead soldier's family pay 35% of everything they work for.
Fight the good fight Cindy!
hack89
(39,171 posts)fasttense
(17,301 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)it. I don't begrude the soldier at all. I think the country should pay for the soldier's funeral if he dies in a combat zone. I think give them $10,000 for funeral expenses.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)but will make enough noise that she will once again bring the illegality of the war to the front.
I wish her well.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)it is time to bring our troops home. All the noise in the world isn't going to bring back her son am sorry to say. I feel terrible for her and many families who have lost loved ones.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)that we had a legit purpose for going into Afghanistan, both propositions which are debatable, overlook that we are up to our eyeballs in armed conflicts of choice and all over the world from out thousand or so bases and as if Cindy Sheehan is just some crazy mother who can't get over the death of her son and has nothing to complain about.
We don't need Cindy Sheehan to stop making "noise". We thousands more like her to get off their keisters and make more noise.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)go into the military. I think the young man was a hero for volunteering. Nothing we say or do is going to bring him back, nothing. I don't know what else you want me to say. There are 2 things in this country that everyone will have and that is death and taxes. I don't think it is right that you don't pay your taxes. Sorry. I don't care who the person is.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)to line the pockets of a corrupt defense industry, which seems to be our biggest export?
That is the question Cindy Sheehan is raising, not what you think of her son's enlistment or if you think she should pay her taxes or not. This is, at bottom, about us not about Casey or Cindy Sheehan.
/punc
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)streets like back in the 60s. Not paying taxes doesn't do it for me sorry. Pay your taxes then recruit many of your friends to march into DC and make your points you would then have alot more support.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)And she's been out in the streets since Camp Casey even if it's hard for the less active among us to keep up with that.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)EFerrari
(163,986 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)EFerrari
(163,986 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)America is a wonder place.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)Peace Activists make their protest, sometimes serve time and the government usually gets their tax money.
snot
(10,529 posts)From the speech she gave just before she set up camp outside Bush's ranch:
Another thing that Im doing is - - my son was killed in 2004, so Im not paying my taxes for 2004. If I get a letter from the IRS, Im gonna say, you know what, this war is illegal; this is why this war is illegal. This war is immoral; this is why this war is immoral. You killed my son for this. I dont owe you anything. And if I live to be a million, I wont owe you a penny.
And I want them to come after me, because unlike what youve been doing with the war resistance, I want to put this frickin war on trial. And I want to say, You give me my son, and Ill pay your taxes.
. . . . And Henry David Thoreau he went to prison, he refused to pay his poll tax, and Emerson, I call them HT and RW, and RW came to visit HT and said what are you doing here, buddy? And HT said, why arent you here? This is the only place for a moral person in an immoral world.
Its up to us, the people, to break immoral laws, and resist. As soon as the leaders of a country lie to you, they have no authority over you. These maniacs have no authority over us. And they might be able to put our bodies in prison, but they cant put our spirits in prison. . . .
* * * * *
The opposite of good is not evil, its apathy.
saras
(6,670 posts)"you know what, this war is illegal; this is why this war is illegal. This war is immoral; this is why this war is immoral. You killed my son for this. I dont owe you anything. And if I live to be a million, I wont owe you a penny"
If, in fact, the war is illegal, then it is being conducted by an illegitimate government, and they shouldn't get public money - ANYONE'S public money, not just hers, for their illegal activities. And when they get caught, like any other criminal, they should be made to pay it all back - in this case, that's all the war profits for anyone who profited from it. It should ALL go back the the American victims of the war, or back to all Americans.
How ELSE do we get there from here?
snot
(10,529 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)she wants to make that an issue. But be prepared for the outcome.
truthisfreedom
(23,147 posts)It's that simple. If we were still fighting in Iraq, they'd still be waiting to prosecute her.
I doubt they'll take much more action during an election year. Look for her to be arrested next year.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)JJW
(1,416 posts)Cindy is standing up to the war criminals in DC that killed her son over sexed up intelligence. All true Americans should stop funding (via tax payments) the disgraceful revolving door of corruption in DC that only represents special pay to play interests.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I wish she wouldn't make this about taxes. Anti-tax narratives play to the right wing far too easily.
Response to hack89 (Original post)
Post removed
NICO9000
(970 posts)I guarantee you the IRS could care less about her son. They'll get their $$ or she'll soon be hanging out with Wesley Snipes in the yard!
2banon
(7,321 posts)but they can't seem to go after real tax evaders.. hmmm..
2banon
(7,321 posts)go after banksters, wall street fraudsters, big business and their ceo's that do off shore banking, manufacturing in China, India and countries that pay pennies to a dollar on "wages". (read legalized slavery)...
no, let's shut down medicinal dispensaries and growers, arrest owster's and sue anti-war activists instead..
so much easier than actually going after the real criminals.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)I'm behind you all the way.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)She should ask Wesley Snipes and Willie Nelson how that worked out for them.
From the headline, I first thought it was a question of a simple dispute over earnings--from book/touring/speaking type stuff, but I see now that she's refusing to pay taxes as a poltiical protest. That kind of tosses any kind of "diminished capacity" argument out the window.
If her residence is hers, and not rented, she won't own that house for long, if that is indeed the case. Those guys will get their money.
I agree--not the smartest fight to pick. It never ends well.
IndyJones
(1,068 posts)unfortunately.
I think it's a fight worth fighting, though, and if given the opportunity to vote on it, I'd side with her. I agree with her that she's given enough to the country by losing her son. On the other hand, her son made the decision to enter the military and he knew the risks. I'm certainly not opposed to extending that benefit to the spouses and parents of those who are killed in service.
I give her props for really standing up for her beliefs.
DUIC
(167 posts)Casey served his country gladly and was proud of his country, paying the ultimate sacrifice. He would now have one more thing to be disapointed in his mother about. What makes Cindy so desperate to be a public spectacle that she does so many things that are contrary to her sons beliefs? Were Casey and Cindy estranged because of his resolve to join the military?
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)DUIC
(167 posts)She is a parent that is using her childs death for a purpose that goes against what the child stood for.
Thats all he wanted to do was serve God and his country his whole life, Carly Sheehan said. He was a boy scout from age 6 or 7 and an Eagle Scout. It was kind of a natural progression to go into the military from that. He said he was enjoying the military because it was just like the boy scouts but they got guns.
http://www.militarytimes.com/valor/soldier/257123/
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)her son.
DUIC
(167 posts)girl gone mad
(20,634 posts)He was a kid when he died. You have no idea what he would have thought or how he would have felt about his mother's actions. His mother gave birth to him, raised him well and loved him. Who are you to try and denigrate a grieving mother by proclaiming that her dead son would have hated her? This only makes you come across like a complete douchebag.
DUIC
(167 posts)The other family members public comments give great insight into how Casey would have felt about his mother using his death as a prop in her stage act. She comes across as a complete douche bag.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)through armed services radio, listened to a steady flow of right wing garb each and every day. It wasn't until after Casey's death that we even got the Ed Show on there, so...
edit for typos...3x DAMN!!!
DUIC
(167 posts)Only Cindy could possibly know that Casey meant the exact opposite of what he was saying because of some secret maternal telepathic bond between her and Casey. And Pat, Carly, and Andy were merely dupes only listening to Casey's statements and watching Casey's deeds and foolishly taking those words and deeds at face value.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)It helps us know you better.
DUIC
(167 posts)I believe it adds that personal touch. It also helps drive the silliness of their argument home.
Thanks for pointing my technique out. Also, thanks for getting in such a rage. It helps us know you better.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine you actually believe you have better knowledge of her son than she does herself. Further, I imagine you will even attempt to rationalize your guesses as valid inference based on...
DUIC
(167 posts)I imagine that you actually believe that Cindy Sheehan has better knowledge than Pat Sheehan, the father who divorced Cindy for 'irreconcilable differences'. Those differences are based, in large part, on Cindy using Casey as a prop. Or Carly Sheehan, his sister. ... or Andy.
I imagine you even attempt to rationalize' Cindy' minority Sheehan view as valid because based on ....?
Gringostan
(127 posts)My sympathies to you Cindy; but this is a fight you can not win.
Mr_Jefferson_24
(8,559 posts)... alleging their willful prosecution of an illegal war based on known and provable deceptions led to the death of her son.
I don't like jury duty as a rule, but that's one I'd be happy to serve on.
Broderick
(4,578 posts)AND LOST BAD.
LOL.
Principle means nothing to them. No, I am not one of "those" that thinks there is no legal responsibility to pay taxes. It was in relation to a tax deduction claimed by two entities wherein I had the legal right, but the legal right gets trumped by the IRS by custodial issues and it becomes a civil matter in my case. At least at that time that was the case. Needless to say, a 1200 tax bill turned into 2000 or more quickly and I refused to pay. Not a wise move.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Pathetic woman.
midnight
(26,624 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)She'd be toast.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)She'll lose this just like every other anti-tax nutjob has.