Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hack89

(39,171 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:30 PM Feb 2012

Feds sue anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan over back taxes

SACRAMENTO, CA (KXTV) - The federal government has filed a lawsuit to force anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan to provide her financial records to the Internal Revenue Service.

An IRS revenue officer said Sheehan refused to answer any questions about her finances after receiving a summons at her Vacaville home.

Sheehan said she's always been up front with the IRS and has no intention of paying her taxes. She says the government has already taken enough from her.

"If they (federal government), can give me my son back, I'll pay my taxes, but that's not going to happen," Sheehan said.


http://www.wtsp.com/news/national/article/240153/81/Anti-war-activist-

Not the smartest fight to pick.
103 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Feds sue anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan over back taxes (Original Post) hack89 Feb 2012 OP
Cindy should quote Santorum that the government can't force you to pay sinkingfeeling Feb 2012 #1
But they can put you in prison. Tripod Feb 2012 #88
I don't think she has a problem with that. sinkingfeeling Feb 2012 #95
I wouldn't want to be her. Tripod Feb 2012 #100
Sorry Cindy, as honourable a position as that may be, you ain't winning that fight... truebrit71 Feb 2012 #2
Well, that's true enough, but Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #4
great minds think alike. My thought also but I limited it to a yr or 2. uppityperson Feb 2012 #6
Yeah, I could get behind that idea... truebrit71 Feb 2012 #9
That sounds like a good proposal to me, Old and In the Way. Uncle Joe Feb 2012 #18
What about their wives, children, and siblings? nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #19
Not sure what you mean. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #23
Based on what though? Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #28
Are children siblings paying federal taxes? Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #31
But not paying taxes is not a benefit for any type of service? Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #36
No on federal workers, possibly for federal agents. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #37
Let's just make it so the spouse and the kids don't have to pay taxes on the soldier's income Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #38
Well, there is SGLI insurance--it doesn't bring back the deceased, but it's a pretty decent chunk of MADem Feb 2012 #58
Sounds like a good idea to me also. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #40
Until the spouse of a dead soldier becomes CEO of HP or works at Goldman Sachs. Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #41
Well if someone remarries I think they would no longer have the exemption. sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #42
Sounds like it just got a lot more complicated. Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #43
Wife? How about spouse? 24601 Feb 2012 #44
True. I've edited my post. nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #45
Not sure she's expecting to win Bradical79 Feb 2012 #77
She needs help itsrobert Feb 2012 #3
Here's an interesting thought. If your kid gets killed in the military, excuse family from paying uppityperson Feb 2012 #5
Sounds sort of like a payoff to me frazzled Feb 2012 #22
I see it as an addition to those death benefits you mention and agree with. uppityperson Feb 2012 #26
Taxes are taxes that everyone should pay, not a benefit frazzled Feb 2012 #27
Your quote " Death benefits, yes". Now you don't agree with this? uppityperson Feb 2012 #73
Or did and figured she stops a lot of harm and a trivial amount of good by not paying saras Feb 2012 #46
How is she harming somebody else's child? girl gone mad Feb 2012 #92
Why not ... bayareaboy Feb 2012 #7
If she paid as much as GE she'd get a rebate dflprincess Feb 2012 #50
ding ding ding ding ding.. 2banon Feb 2012 #53
EGGS ZACTLY! bayareaboy Feb 2012 #56
I thought this exact thing, too. I mean, there is something clearly wrong with our system when IndyJones Feb 2012 #60
this is not going to turn out well SemperEadem Feb 2012 #8
I suspect she wants to go to jail to make a statement. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #10
yes, it's not about her taxes 2pooped2pop Feb 2012 #33
An admirable stance, akin to Thoreau's objections in 1848. I feel it will end similarly. . . Journeyman Feb 2012 #11
How did Thoreau's case end? snot Feb 2012 #16
He was carted off to jail . . . Journeyman Feb 2012 #35
Thank you! What a wonderful history! snot Feb 2012 #82
"Not the smartest fight to pick." True enough, look what happend to Wesley Snipes cstanleytech Feb 2012 #12
Mrs Sheehan's son enlisted for the military. When they are in a war zone they get hazardous duty pay southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #13
Yes they pay taxes while in a war zone. fasttense Feb 2012 #20
The Combat Zone Exclusion covers base pay, combat pay and reenilistment bonuses hack89 Feb 2012 #25
And that is why the IRS ended up owing me money after the audit. n/t fasttense Feb 2012 #61
I knew something about the break they get during a war zone. By the way they earned every penny of southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #29
I suspect she will lose 2pooped2pop Feb 2012 #34
We are out of Iraq. We had a legit purpose in going to Afghanistan. Now that OBL is dead southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #39
It always surprises me when people who believe we are out of Iraq and EFerrari Feb 2012 #68
I am sorry for her lose. Remember this is an all volunteer military. No one twisted her son to southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #71
The larger question is do you agree that our tax money should be used EFerrari Feb 2012 #79
No. But that and a cup of coffee isn't going to make a difference. Not until we have people in the southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #81
Cindy Sheehan was the first occupier, which I believe was pointed out by Will Pitt. EFerrari Feb 2012 #83
Good for her. I wish her well. But pay your taxes. southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #84
Her act of conscience is not up for a vote any more than Baez's was or Thoreau's. nt EFerrari Feb 2012 #87
Good point. I leave you with that for now. I went off to watch Bill Maher on Yahoo. southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #91
Peace activists not paying taxes has a long tradition in this country. EFerrari Feb 2012 #65
That is an american tradition. Enjoy all the benefits without paying taxes. southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #66
You may be confusing anti-war activists with GE or Goldman Sachs. EFerrari Feb 2012 #76
Sheehan has been prepared from Day One to go to jail for her convictions. snot Feb 2012 #14
I think we have a winner. saras Feb 2012 #47
I also find it interesting that they've waited until now to sue her. She stopped paying in 2004. snot Feb 2012 #15
Have you stopped to think maybe she is trying to make a point. I think she is. That is fine if southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #17
They waited until we pulled out of Iraq because they wanted to weaken her position politically. truthisfreedom Feb 2012 #86
Blade 4 is going to be awesome. nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #21
I support Cindy nt kgnu_fan Feb 2012 #24
Excellent! Go Cindy! JJW Feb 2012 #30
Hmm kenfrequed Feb 2012 #32
Spam deleted by uppityperson (MIR Team) sdghjtyjty Feb 2012 #48
She'd better be ready to go to prison then NICO9000 Feb 2012 #49
The IRS has power over SCOTUS, Congress, and the Executive branch 2banon Feb 2012 #54
typical of the Feds, going after low hanging fruit, never mind the real tax evaders 2banon Feb 2012 #51
Good for you, Cindy!! proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #52
How many political prisoners does the U.S. currently hold? lonestarnot Feb 2012 #55
Refusal to pay taxes is a crime, not dissent. nt geek tragedy Feb 2012 #90
Ah ha "... has no intention of paying her taxes." MADem Feb 2012 #57
Hmmm...interesting issue. I see where she's coming from but I don't think she's going to win, IndyJones Feb 2012 #59
Casey Sheehan would be so disapointed in his mother DUIC Feb 2012 #62
How disgusting to use Casey Sheehan to attack his mother. EFerrari Feb 2012 #64
How disgusting of Cindy to use the memory of Casey Sheehan to protest DUIC Feb 2012 #69
No. Unlike yourself, Cindy Sheehan has the right to invoke EFerrari Feb 2012 #74
Not according to every other member of the Sheehan family that deplore Cindy's actions DUIC Feb 2012 #80
And you're attempting to speak for a dead person. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #93
Carly Sheehan, Pat Sheehan, and Andy Sheehan have all spoken out against Cindy's grandstanding DUIC Feb 2012 #94
Carly Sheehan, Pat Sheehan, and Andy Sheehan did not GIVE BIRTH to Casey, who no doubt, LaydeeBug Feb 2012 #96
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggghhhhhhttttt DUIC Feb 2012 #97
"She comes across as a complete douche bag". Thank you for being so open with your views. uppityperson Feb 2012 #99
I like to use the persons argument against themselves in my response DUIC Feb 2012 #102
That is "in a rage"? I do not think that word means what you think it means. uppityperson Feb 2012 #103
I imagine you actually believe you... LanternWaste Feb 2012 #70
I imagine that you actually believe ... DUIC Feb 2012 #72
My sympathies to you Cindy Gringostan Feb 2012 #63
Why not countersue with a wrongful death civil action against the government... Mr_Jefferson_24 Feb 2012 #67
I fought the IRS many years back Broderick Feb 2012 #75
Using her dead son to chisel on her taxes. Might be as low as it gets. Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #78
K&R. for Cindy. I can't wait till she takes them to court... She has been waiting for this day. midnight Feb 2012 #85
And offers that as a defense? Ummm, yeah. Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #98
She's a wacko LaRouche/Paulbot who thinks taxes are unconstitutional. geek tragedy Feb 2012 #89
Just pay your damn taxes and employ a teacher. Fearless Feb 2012 #101

sinkingfeeling

(51,457 posts)
1. Cindy should quote Santorum that the government can't force you to pay
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:31 PM
Feb 2012

for something you don't believe in.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
2. Sorry Cindy, as honourable a position as that may be, you ain't winning that fight...
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:32 PM
Feb 2012

...like they say, only two things in life guaranteed, death and taxes...and you don't get to choose between 'em...

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
4. Well, that's true enough, but
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:36 PM
Feb 2012

the idea of waiving taxes for deceased soldiers - for the parents if unmarried or the spouse if married - is noble and a way for this country to express their gratitude, every year.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
23. Not sure what you mean.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:59 PM
Feb 2012

I specifically said spouses in my post. I don't think the exemption should carry through, generationally.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
28. Based on what though?
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:10 PM
Feb 2012

It seems like siblings and children can be just as hard hit emotionally as parent if not more. Spouses seem to be the best argument, but they are not paying taxes on the soldiers income at that point.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
31. Are children siblings paying federal taxes?
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:20 PM
Feb 2012

OK, maybe up to the 18th birthday it would be reasonable if they exceeded the minimum taxable income...but, after that, I think it would be fair to stop it there. Spouses do pay taxes on their own income, though...and I think it's an easy way for the government to recognize a special benefit that acknowledges his/her loss for the deceased service to this country.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
36. But not paying taxes is not a benefit for any type of service?
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:31 PM
Feb 2012

And kids will pay taxes so why aren't they exempt? If there was a draft then maybe it would be a better argument, but there is not.

If a federal agent, or other federal worker dies while on duty, should their spouses also pay no taxes?

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
37. No on federal workers, possibly for federal agents.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:42 PM
Feb 2012

If your job description puts you in a likely position to potentially die in service to your country...I think it's reasonable. Already answered your kids question and I don't see what's relevant about a draft that doesn't exist.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
38. Let's just make it so the spouse and the kids don't have to pay taxes on the soldier's income
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:54 PM
Feb 2012

after he dies in combat. That sounds fair.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
58. Well, there is SGLI insurance--it doesn't bring back the deceased, but it's a pretty decent chunk of
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 04:10 AM
Feb 2012

change. There's also a smaller "death benefit" that will pay for burial, provide the tombstone/marker, etc.

It's not like people who have lost a loved one in wartime are just tossed to the curb with no resources to transition.

Lots here--follow the links: http://www.vba.va.gov/survivors/

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
40. Sounds like a good idea to me also.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:19 PM
Feb 2012

Perhaps Cindy taking this stand could make it an issue. I can't imagine too many Americans opposing that kind of support for the troops. Maybe after all it's a fight the Government might not want to have.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
41. Until the spouse of a dead soldier becomes CEO of HP or works at Goldman Sachs.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:22 PM
Feb 2012

Last edited Wed Feb 22, 2012, 07:10 PM - Edit history (1)

Or remarries a businessman who names him/her CEO so he/she can route both their salaries through him/her.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
42. Well if someone remarries I think they would no longer have the exemption.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:26 PM
Feb 2012

Doesn't it work that way with other benefits available to widows/widowers?

As for becoming a high earning CEO, that too could be considered in the legislation.

But Cindy definitely has a point. They took her son, refused to answer her questions as to why he died, and she cannot get him back. Is there a price on that?

Most other countries do treat their veterans and surviving families much better than they are treated here.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
43. Sounds like it just got a lot more complicated.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:33 PM
Feb 2012

I'm pretty sure her son signed up. I think he was pretty gung-ho about the military in fact.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
77. Not sure she's expecting to win
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:46 PM
Feb 2012

She's drawing a lot of attention to her anti-war stance and loss of her son again, so I a suspect she knew very well it would come to this eventually.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
5. Here's an interesting thought. If your kid gets killed in the military, excuse family from paying
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:37 PM
Feb 2012

taxes for that yr, including not only the dead military person's family, but his/her parents. I wouldn't cause a lot of problems in the gvt and might be a decent thing to do.

I know, the "kid" is an adult so why should his/her parents get a tax break, but just thinking it would be decent.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
22. Sounds sort of like a payoff to me
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:59 PM
Feb 2012

Or a bribe. I think it sounds kind of cheap and disgusting, as if escaping paying your taxes for a year is compensation for the death of a child. As if that would even the balance sheet. Money, money, money: I thought only Republicans think about it all the time.

Sorry, but in a country with a volunteer army, that is not how things work. Death benefits, yes; parents escaping their taxes, no. We're Democrats: we all pay taxes because we believe in contributing to the common good (and to fixing those things we disagree are contributing to the common good through the democratic system).

Did Cindy Sheehan ever think that by withholding her taxes she harms somebody else's child? I bet she didn't.



frazzled

(18,402 posts)
27. Taxes are taxes that everyone should pay, not a benefit
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:08 PM
Feb 2012

No, I clearly don't agree with anything you suggest.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
73. Your quote " Death benefits, yes". Now you don't agree with this?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:39 PM
Feb 2012

Another quote of yours: "Money, money, money: I thought only Republicans think about it all the time. "
You are wrong. The unemployed, the underemployed also think about it all the time.

bayareaboy

(793 posts)
7. Why not ...
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:41 PM
Feb 2012

Have Cindy pay the same amount as GE. That would be zero. Besides that they didn't have to give up a son.

dflprincess

(28,078 posts)
50. If she paid as much as GE she'd get a rebate
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 11:08 PM
Feb 2012

I wonder how much money GE made off the war her son died in? All parents or spouses of dead soldiers should get GE's negative tax rate.

bayareaboy

(793 posts)
56. EGGS ZACTLY!
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 02:47 AM
Feb 2012

I don't really think that has anything to worry about, actually having to pay back taxes though. She probably does not have much funds and there are still lots of folks who stopped paying during the 1960s.

In fact I will bet that it probably isn't very high on her list, payin back the goverment.

IndyJones

(1,068 posts)
60. I thought this exact thing, too. I mean, there is something clearly wrong with our system when
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:38 AM
Feb 2012

a multi million dollar corporation pays less in taxes than the CEO makes each year (or gets a huge refund).

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
8. this is not going to turn out well
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:46 PM
Feb 2012

Cindy, figure out a way to pay your back taxes and then fight for a change to the tax laws where parents who lose children in wars can be exempt from paying taxes.

2ndAmForComputers

(3,527 posts)
10. I suspect she wants to go to jail to make a statement.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:53 PM
Feb 2012

Can't say I fault her. I have no idea what I would do if my only child was killed by right-wing policies. Shudder.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
33. yes, it's not about her taxes
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:26 PM
Feb 2012

it's about the insult to think she should pay them when they sent her son to die in an illegal war, I'll wager.

Good luck Cindy. I think of you, often.

Journeyman

(15,031 posts)
35. He was carted off to jail . . .
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:29 PM
Feb 2012

and an Aunt paid his taxes for him the next morning, to avoid scandal to the family name.

But then, he used the occasion as the impetus to write possibly the most explosive political essay of all time, Civil Disobedience, the document that has, so far, set in motion resistance movements from India to the U.S., and countless lands in between.

http://thoreau.eserver.org/civil.html

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
12. "Not the smartest fight to pick." True enough, look what happend to Wesley Snipes
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:55 PM
Feb 2012

when he tried to get out of paying his taxes.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
13. Mrs Sheehan's son enlisted for the military. When they are in a war zone they get hazardous duty pay
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 03:58 PM
Feb 2012

which increases their pay. I also think they don't have to pay taxes while they are in a combat zone. They deserve that much from us. I do think we should also pay for the soldiers funeral when they die in combat. The married soldier's family get extended benefits for the rest of the lives or unless they remarry. If the soldier has a family their family members can take advantage of the schooling they offer. I know it helped my sister who went to college. I think the government has done very well by our soldiers in combat. I do wish they would do more for the wounded soldiers who come back as far as health care.

I feel terrible for Mrs Sheehan but I would suggest she pay her taxes or she will lose and be sitting in a jail cell.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
20. Yes they pay taxes while in a war zone.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:42 PM
Feb 2012

They just don't pay taxes on hazardous duty pay.

By the way, bush was doing audits of military members taxes when he was in office. I know, I was auditted while I was in the Navy. But the IRS ended up owing me money.

Yes, she will end up in jail but NOT because our laws are fair and equitable. Only in this America can a corporation pay absolutely zero taxes, get a tax subsidy, give up nothing, make billions and encourage war-mongers, while a dead soldier's family pay 35% of everything they work for.

Fight the good fight Cindy!

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
29. I knew something about the break they get during a war zone. By the way they earned every penny of
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:10 PM
Feb 2012

it. I don't begrude the soldier at all. I think the country should pay for the soldier's funeral if he dies in a combat zone. I think give them $10,000 for funeral expenses.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
34. I suspect she will lose
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:28 PM
Feb 2012

but will make enough noise that she will once again bring the illegality of the war to the front.

I wish her well.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
39. We are out of Iraq. We had a legit purpose in going to Afghanistan. Now that OBL is dead
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:17 PM
Feb 2012

it is time to bring our troops home. All the noise in the world isn't going to bring back her son am sorry to say. I feel terrible for her and many families who have lost loved ones.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
68. It always surprises me when people who believe we are out of Iraq and
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:02 PM
Feb 2012

that we had a legit purpose for going into Afghanistan, both propositions which are debatable, overlook that we are up to our eyeballs in armed conflicts of choice and all over the world from out thousand or so bases and as if Cindy Sheehan is just some crazy mother who can't get over the death of her son and has nothing to complain about.

We don't need Cindy Sheehan to stop making "noise". We thousands more like her to get off their keisters and make more noise.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
71. I am sorry for her lose. Remember this is an all volunteer military. No one twisted her son to
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 02:17 PM
Feb 2012

go into the military. I think the young man was a hero for volunteering. Nothing we say or do is going to bring him back, nothing. I don't know what else you want me to say. There are 2 things in this country that everyone will have and that is death and taxes. I don't think it is right that you don't pay your taxes. Sorry. I don't care who the person is.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
79. The larger question is do you agree that our tax money should be used
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:48 PM
Feb 2012

to line the pockets of a corrupt defense industry, which seems to be our biggest export?

That is the question Cindy Sheehan is raising, not what you think of her son's enlistment or if you think she should pay her taxes or not. This is, at bottom, about us not about Casey or Cindy Sheehan.

/punc

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
81. No. But that and a cup of coffee isn't going to make a difference. Not until we have people in the
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 09:10 PM
Feb 2012

streets like back in the 60s. Not paying taxes doesn't do it for me sorry. Pay your taxes then recruit many of your friends to march into DC and make your points you would then have alot more support.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
83. Cindy Sheehan was the first occupier, which I believe was pointed out by Will Pitt.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:11 PM
Feb 2012

And she's been out in the streets since Camp Casey even if it's hard for the less active among us to keep up with that.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
66. That is an american tradition. Enjoy all the benefits without paying taxes.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:50 PM
Feb 2012

America is a wonder place.

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
76. You may be confusing anti-war activists with GE or Goldman Sachs.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:44 PM
Feb 2012

Peace Activists make their protest, sometimes serve time and the government usually gets their tax money.

snot

(10,529 posts)
14. Sheehan has been prepared from Day One to go to jail for her convictions.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:10 PM
Feb 2012

From the speech she gave just before she set up camp outside Bush's ranch:

Another thing that I’m doing is - - my son was killed in 2004, so I’m not paying my taxes for 2004. If I get a letter from the IRS, I’m gonna say, you know what, this war is illegal; this is why this war is illegal. This war is immoral; this is why this war is immoral. You killed my son for this. I don’t owe you anything. And if I live to be a million, I won’t owe you a penny.

And I want them to come after me, because unlike what you’ve been doing with the war resistance, I want to put this frickin’ war on trial. And I want to say, “You give me my son, and I’ll pay your taxes.”

. . . . And Henry David Thoreau he went to prison, he refused to pay his poll tax, and Emerson, I call them HT and RW, and RW came to visit HT and said what are you doing here, buddy? And HT said, why aren’t you here? This is the only place for a moral person in an immoral world.

It’s up to us, the people, to break immoral laws, and resist. As soon as the leaders of a country lie to you, they have no authority over you. These maniacs have no authority over us. And they might be able to put our bodies in prison, but they can’t put our spirits in prison. . . .

* * * * *

The opposite of good is not evil, it’s apathy.
 

saras

(6,670 posts)
47. I think we have a winner.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 09:28 PM
Feb 2012

"you know what, this war is illegal; this is why this war is illegal. This war is immoral; this is why this war is immoral. You killed my son for this. I don’t owe you anything. And if I live to be a million, I won’t owe you a penny"

If, in fact, the war is illegal, then it is being conducted by an illegitimate government, and they shouldn't get public money - ANYONE'S public money, not just hers, for their illegal activities. And when they get caught, like any other criminal, they should be made to pay it all back - in this case, that's all the war profits for anyone who profited from it. It should ALL go back the the American victims of the war, or back to all Americans.

How ELSE do we get there from here?

snot

(10,529 posts)
15. I also find it interesting that they've waited until now to sue her. She stopped paying in 2004.
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:18 PM
Feb 2012
 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
17. Have you stopped to think maybe she is trying to make a point. I think she is. That is fine if
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 04:21 PM
Feb 2012

she wants to make that an issue. But be prepared for the outcome.

truthisfreedom

(23,147 posts)
86. They waited until we pulled out of Iraq because they wanted to weaken her position politically.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 11:39 PM
Feb 2012

It's that simple. If we were still fighting in Iraq, they'd still be waiting to prosecute her.

I doubt they'll take much more action during an election year. Look for her to be arrested next year.

 

JJW

(1,416 posts)
30. Excellent! Go Cindy!
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:20 PM
Feb 2012

Cindy is standing up to the war criminals in DC that killed her son over sexed up intelligence. All true Americans should stop funding (via tax payments) the disgraceful revolving door of corruption in DC that only represents special pay to play interests.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
32. Hmm
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:21 PM
Feb 2012

I wish she wouldn't make this about taxes. Anti-tax narratives play to the right wing far too easily.

Response to hack89 (Original post)

NICO9000

(970 posts)
49. She'd better be ready to go to prison then
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 10:56 PM
Feb 2012

I guarantee you the IRS could care less about her son. They'll get their $$ or she'll soon be hanging out with Wesley Snipes in the yard!

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
54. The IRS has power over SCOTUS, Congress, and the Executive branch
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:23 AM
Feb 2012

but they can't seem to go after real tax evaders.. hmmm..

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
51. typical of the Feds, going after low hanging fruit, never mind the real tax evaders
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 11:41 PM
Feb 2012

go after banksters, wall street fraudsters, big business and their ceo's that do off shore banking, manufacturing in China, India and countries that pay pennies to a dollar on "wages". (read legalized slavery)...

no, let's shut down medicinal dispensaries and growers, arrest owster's and sue anti-war activists instead..

so much easier than actually going after the real criminals.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
57. Ah ha "... has no intention of paying her taxes."
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 04:05 AM
Feb 2012

She should ask Wesley Snipes and Willie Nelson how that worked out for them.

From the headline, I first thought it was a question of a simple dispute over earnings--from book/touring/speaking type stuff, but I see now that she's refusing to pay taxes as a poltiical protest. That kind of tosses any kind of "diminished capacity" argument out the window.

If her residence is hers, and not rented, she won't own that house for long, if that is indeed the case. Those guys will get their money.

I agree--not the smartest fight to pick. It never ends well.

IndyJones

(1,068 posts)
59. Hmmm...interesting issue. I see where she's coming from but I don't think she's going to win,
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:35 AM
Feb 2012

unfortunately.

I think it's a fight worth fighting, though, and if given the opportunity to vote on it, I'd side with her. I agree with her that she's given enough to the country by losing her son. On the other hand, her son made the decision to enter the military and he knew the risks. I'm certainly not opposed to extending that benefit to the spouses and parents of those who are killed in service.

I give her props for really standing up for her beliefs.

 

DUIC

(167 posts)
62. Casey Sheehan would be so disapointed in his mother
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 09:41 AM
Feb 2012

Casey served his country gladly and was proud of his country, paying the ultimate sacrifice. He would now have one more thing to be disapointed in his mother about. What makes Cindy so desperate to be a public spectacle that she does so many things that are contrary to her sons beliefs? Were Casey and Cindy estranged because of his resolve to join the military?

 

DUIC

(167 posts)
69. How disgusting of Cindy to use the memory of Casey Sheehan to protest
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:04 PM
Feb 2012

She is a parent that is using her childs death for a purpose that goes against what the child stood for.


“That’s all he wanted to do was serve God and his country his whole life,” Carly Sheehan said. “He was a boy scout from age 6 or 7 and an Eagle Scout. It was kind of a natural progression to go into the military from that. He said he was enjoying the military because it was just like the boy scouts but they got guns.”


http://www.militarytimes.com/valor/soldier/257123/

girl gone mad

(20,634 posts)
93. And you're attempting to speak for a dead person.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:37 AM
Feb 2012

He was a kid when he died. You have no idea what he would have thought or how he would have felt about his mother's actions. His mother gave birth to him, raised him well and loved him. Who are you to try and denigrate a grieving mother by proclaiming that her dead son would have hated her? This only makes you come across like a complete douchebag.

 

DUIC

(167 posts)
94. Carly Sheehan, Pat Sheehan, and Andy Sheehan have all spoken out against Cindy's grandstanding
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 09:59 AM
Feb 2012

The other family members public comments give great insight into how Casey would have felt about his mother using his death as a prop in her stage act. She comes across as a complete douche bag.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
96. Carly Sheehan, Pat Sheehan, and Andy Sheehan did not GIVE BIRTH to Casey, who no doubt,
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 12:23 PM
Feb 2012

through armed services radio, listened to a steady flow of right wing garb each and every day. It wasn't until after Casey's death that we even got the Ed Show on there, so...



edit for typos...3x DAMN!!!

 

DUIC

(167 posts)
97. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggghhhhhhttttt
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 12:30 PM
Feb 2012

Only Cindy could possibly know that Casey meant the exact opposite of what he was saying because of some secret maternal telepathic bond between her and Casey. And Pat, Carly, and Andy were merely dupes only listening to Casey's statements and watching Casey's deeds and foolishly taking those words and deeds at face value.


uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
99. "She comes across as a complete douche bag". Thank you for being so open with your views.
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 12:28 AM
Feb 2012

It helps us know you better.

 

DUIC

(167 posts)
102. I like to use the persons argument against themselves in my response
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 10:21 AM
Feb 2012

I believe it adds that personal touch. It also helps drive the silliness of their argument home.

Thanks for pointing my technique out. Also, thanks for getting in such a rage. It helps us know you better.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
70. I imagine you actually believe you...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 02:13 PM
Feb 2012

I imagine you actually believe you have better knowledge of her son than she does herself. Further, I imagine you will even attempt to rationalize your guesses as valid inference based on...

 

DUIC

(167 posts)
72. I imagine that you actually believe ...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 03:49 PM
Feb 2012

I imagine that you actually believe that Cindy Sheehan has better knowledge than Pat Sheehan, the father who divorced Cindy for 'irreconcilable differences'. Those differences are based, in large part, on Cindy using Casey as a prop. Or Carly Sheehan, his sister. ... or Andy.


I imagine you even attempt to rationalize' Cindy' minority Sheehan view as valid because based on ....?

Mr_Jefferson_24

(8,559 posts)
67. Why not countersue with a wrongful death civil action against the government...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:58 PM
Feb 2012

... alleging their willful prosecution of an illegal war based on known and provable deceptions led to the death of her son.

I don't like jury duty as a rule, but that's one I'd be happy to serve on.

Broderick

(4,578 posts)
75. I fought the IRS many years back
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 05:43 PM
Feb 2012

AND LOST BAD.

LOL.

Principle means nothing to them. No, I am not one of "those" that thinks there is no legal responsibility to pay taxes. It was in relation to a tax deduction claimed by two entities wherein I had the legal right, but the legal right gets trumped by the IRS by custodial issues and it becomes a civil matter in my case. At least at that time that was the case. Needless to say, a 1200 tax bill turned into 2000 or more quickly and I refused to pay. Not a wise move.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
89. She's a wacko LaRouche/Paulbot who thinks taxes are unconstitutional.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 12:38 AM
Feb 2012

She'll lose this just like every other anti-tax nutjob has.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Feds sue anti-war activis...