Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:51 AM Sep 2013

Revealed: Britain sold nerve gas chemicals to Syria 10 months after war began

Source: Scottish Daily Record and Sunday Mail

FURIOUS politicians have demanded Prime Minister David Cameron explain why chemical export licences were granted to firms last January – 10 months after the Syrian uprising began.

BRITAIN allowed firms to sell chemicals to Syria capable of being used to make nerve gas, the Sunday Mail can reveal today.


...

The chemical export licences were granted by Business Secretary Vince Cable’s Department for Business, Innovation and Skills last January – 10 months after the Syrian uprising began.

They were only revoked six months later, when the European Union imposed tough sanctions on Assad’s regime.

Read more: http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/britain-sold-nerve-gas-chemicals-2242520

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revealed: Britain sold nerve gas chemicals to Syria 10 months after war began (Original Post) jakeXT Sep 2013 OP
No one could have predicted that. Scuba Sep 2013 #1
Did you read the article? the chemicals were sold AFTER darkangel218 Sep 2013 #2
You forgot the sarcasm tag. TalkingDog Sep 2013 #4
Thanks, at least you got it. Scuba Sep 2013 #5
In all fairness, you don't look that much like Condalisa Rice... Thor_MN Sep 2013 #13
Agreed. I'm also NOT a war criminal. Scuba Sep 2013 #15
Hey, I got it. you always like him best. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #26
I WILL KICK SARCASTIC SCUBA ASS Skittles Sep 2013 #28
Like planes and buildings? Enthusiast Sep 2013 #19
exactly. robinlynne Sep 2013 #20
We didn't sell crack, it was 20 tons of Sudafed bigbrother05 Sep 2013 #21
"What's wrong with hauling in some massive War Profiteering booty?" - Republicons Berlum Sep 2013 #3
This is ridiculous... George II Sep 2013 #6
Looks like Syria isn't doing it..or they didn't mention them jakeXT Sep 2013 #7
My point was that sodium fluoride is a common substance with innocent uses George II Sep 2013 #11
Is it used to make Sarin? nt SunSeeker Sep 2013 #18
In 2000 and 2001 and 2002 there was the same debate. Igel Sep 2013 #23
Thanks for being the voice of reason n/t FarrenH Sep 2013 #41
Agreed, but your post will be ignored by most of DU Lurks Often Sep 2013 #27
Misused you mean. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #35
Most substances, if misused, can be poison. George II Sep 2013 #38
This was concentrated toxic powder. (As stated in the article) DeSwiss Sep 2013 #39
To be fair, although the sale was wrongheaded, the weapons were most likely built well before ... Pterodactyl Sep 2013 #8
Maybe not fair, but for some it certainly is easy to make such ridiculous claims George II Sep 2013 #10
Not Chemicals! mathematic Sep 2013 #9
Yeah, freaking out over fluorine is silly; it's not even Schedule 3. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #25
Our local agitprop war cheerleader already posted this months ago. Arctic Dave Sep 2013 #12
I've only tasted tea with chlorine. The question is what impact it will have on UK politics, jakeXT Sep 2013 #16
See? The MIC ALWAYS MAKES $$$$ workinclasszero Sep 2013 #14
good lord step back from the ledge Egnever Sep 2013 #33
To Repubs: It's not Saddam's old cache. caseymoz Sep 2013 #17
Hard to say about this daleo Sep 2013 #22
I am confused. cstanleytech Sep 2013 #24
Government let British company export nerve gas chemicals to Syria dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #29
We'd better bomb Great Britain. Vanje Sep 2013 #30
Let's take out Big Ben. former9thward Sep 2013 #43
Locking... Lasher Sep 2013 #31
Unlocking this thread Lasher Sep 2013 #32
London must be punished! Alamuti Lotus Sep 2013 #34
Potassium fluoride and sodium fluoride DeSwiss Sep 2013 #36
It's all business, baby n/t Cal Carpenter Sep 2013 #37
K & R. dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #40
Smooth Cameron! n/t bobGandolf Sep 2013 #42

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
3. "What's wrong with hauling in some massive War Profiteering booty?" - Republicons
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:02 AM
Sep 2013

"The freaking LibTards in England, and in America, just don't get it about the free enterprise system." - Republicons (R)

George II

(67,782 posts)
6. This is ridiculous...
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:12 AM
Sep 2013

Sodium fluoride is used in DRINKING WATER, Americans have been ingesting it for decades.

Potassium fluoride is used in all kinds of industries, mostly metallurgical uses.

Igel

(35,309 posts)
23. In 2000 and 2001 and 2002 there was the same debate.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 11:24 AM
Sep 2013

Aluminum tubes, IIRC. They could be used to enrich uranium.

They could be used for making drinking water and outfitting sewage treatment plants.

Those who fervently believed Saddam was resurrecting his nuclear weapons program said, "Dual use = bad use." Those who said, "Little innocent babies are dying because we deny them these harmless, innocent tubes, and each of us, personally, is morally liable for each and every cry and--shudder to think--death. We must do something! Think of the babies and don't tie up those tubes!"

There were a lot of dual-use materials. Some were chemical. Some were mechanical or used in construction and machinery.

We see the same debate concerning Israeli limitations of imports into Gaza. "We need pipes for sewers and drinking water!" The response being, "We know that you use at least some of them for building rocket launchers that you are so proud of." You tell me what you believed before you hear the report and you've probably at the same time stated what you think the One True Moral Stance is.

American politics played the same game with the precursor chemicals used by Saddam to produce toxic gas for use against the Kurds. Most didn't come from the US, but since we're each morally personally responsible for everything, we only focus on what the US sent. A lot of those chemicals were dual use, as well. You pick who you think is evil, assume that the only use to be made of a dual-use import is the evil one, and you've used your assumption to prove the assumption.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
27. Agreed, but your post will be ignored by most of DU
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 01:15 PM
Sep 2013

because it uses facts and common sense. Most of the chemicals exported to the Syria and Iraq (under Saddam) had multiple uses and any decent chemical company can make usable chemical weapons.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
39. This was concentrated toxic powder. (As stated in the article)
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 08:07 PM
Sep 2013

It was already poison upon manufacture.

Water is poison but only in massive quantities.

This shit was poison the moment it was made.

It was made to be a poison.

Not unless you believe they were buying this toxic powder supposedly to make aluminum windows while they're also in the middle of a civil war!

- That level of incredulity would be considered toxic as well.........

Pterodactyl

(1,687 posts)
8. To be fair, although the sale was wrongheaded, the weapons were most likely built well before ...
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:28 AM
Sep 2013

... the importation and the chemicals themselves have medical and industrial uses as well as weapons uses. Britain should have blocked the exports, but it would not be fair to say that the chemicals were used in the attack.

mathematic

(1,439 posts)
9. Not Chemicals!
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:36 AM
Sep 2013

This is like blaming the export of computers to Syria for the chemical weapons attack because the generals communicate via email.

Fluorine is the universe's most reactive element. It reacts with everything that can react with anything. It's more common in the earth's crust than carbon. It can be made anywhere on the damn planet. If they were buying it from the UK its only because the UK companies must have been giving them a good price.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
12. Our local agitprop war cheerleader already posted this months ago.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 10:03 AM
Sep 2013

The "chemicals" are use in fluoridating water. If you consume water from a municipality then you've been drinking all this time.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
14. See? The MIC ALWAYS MAKES $$$$
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 10:09 AM
Sep 2013

Obviously the MIC is alive and well not only here but GB as well!

So they sell gas to a dictator in danger of losing his civil war...knowing full well what the slimeball is going to do with it.

Then their fellow MIC in the USA sells the missiles, bombs, etc necessary to take out gas using dictator!

So who loses? Syrians who get gassed, dictator who gets tomahawked, bombed, GB and American public who have to pay for this shit in blood and money.

Who wins?

The bloody fucking MIC who set the whole thing up from jump, it would seem!

The MIC ALWAYS WINS! ALWAYS!!!

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
33. good lord step back from the ledge
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 05:05 PM
Sep 2013

did you even read the article or are you just lighting your hair on fire over a headline?

daleo

(21,317 posts)
22. Hard to say about this
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 11:19 AM
Sep 2013

The chemicals are in powder form and highly toxic. The licences specified that they should be used for making aluminium structures such as window frames.

Professor Alastair Hay, an expert in environmental toxicology at Leeds University, said: “They have a variety of industrial uses.

“But when you’re making a nerve agent, you attach a fluoride element and that’s what gives it
its toxic properties.

“Fluoride is key to making these munitions.

- from the article.

On the one hand, it may be that these are common and easy to make anyway. But, if so, why bother with sanctions later?

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
24. I am confused.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 11:44 AM
Sep 2013

The author starts with the headlin of "Revealed: Britain sold nerve gas chemicals to Syria 10 months after war began"

yet they then write

"BRITAIN allowed firms to sell chemicals to Syria capable of being used to make nerve gas, the Sunday Mail can reveal today."


Then again I guess it makes a better headline than

"Revealed: UK sold chemicals capable of being made into nerve gas to Syria 10 months after war began"

would make.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
29. Government let British company export nerve gas chemicals to Syria
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 05:56 PM
Sep 2013

The Government was accused of “breathtaking laxity” in its arms controls tonight after it emerged that officials authorised the export to Syria of two chemicals capable of being used to make a nerve agent such as sarin a year ago.

The Business Secretary, Vince Cable, will on Monday be asked by MPs to explain why a British company was granted export licences for the dual-use substances for six months in 2012 while Syria’s civil war was raging and concern was rife that the regime could use chemical weapons on its own people. The disclosure of the licences for potassium fluoride and sodium fluoride, which can both be used as precursor chemicals in the manufacture of nerve gas, came as the US Secretary of State John Kerry said the United States had evidence that sarin gas was used in last month’s atrocity in Damascus.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills insisted that although the licences were granted to an unnamed UK chemical company in January 2012, the substances were not sent to Syria before the permits were eventually revoked last July in response to tightened European Union sanctions.

In a previously unpublicised letter to MPs last year, Mr Cable acknowledged that his officials had authorised the export of an unspecified quantity of the chemicals in the knowledge that they were listed on an international schedule of chemical weapon precursors.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/government-let-british-company-export-nerve-gas-chemicals-to-syria-8793642.html

Lasher

(27,597 posts)
31. Locking...
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 12:30 AM
Sep 2013

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.

Lasher

(27,597 posts)
32. Unlocking this thread
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 01:02 PM
Sep 2013

We confused the Sunday Mail (the Sunday counterpart of the legitimate Daily Record) with the Mail on Sunday (the Sunday counterpart of the Daily Mail, a tabloid). We regret this mistake.

Lately we have been seeing a lot of unfamiliar news sources and we are doing our best to recognize the ones that are not reputable mainstream news websites or blogs, and therefore forbidden by the LBN SOP. We'll get better at it.

Lasher

 

Alamuti Lotus

(3,093 posts)
34. London must be punished!
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 05:26 PM
Sep 2013

No. 10 needs a 'haircut'!
Glass the motherfuckers!
No blood for boiled pizza!
Cameron is the modern Hitler!
<insert other disturbing war slogans that only sound cool when they're uttered against non-white targets>

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
36. Potassium fluoride and sodium fluoride
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 06:02 PM
Sep 2013
He said: “At best it has been negligent and at worst reckless to export material that could have been used to create chemical weapons. “MPs will be horrified and furious that the UK Government has been allowing the sale of these ingredients to Syria. “What the hell were they doing granting a licence in the first place?

“I would like to know what investigations have been carried out to establish if any of this material exported to Syria was subsequently used in the attacks on its own people.” The SNP’s leader at Westminster, Angus Robertson MP, said: “I will be raising this in Parliament as soon as possible to find out what examination the UK Government made of where these chemicals were going and what they were to be used for. “Approving the sale of chemicals which can be converted into lethal weapons during a civil war is a very serious issue.

*snip*

The Government have refused to identify the licence holders or say whether the licences were issued to one or two companies. The chemicals are in powder form and highly toxic. The licences specified that they should be used for making aluminium structures such as window frames.

Professor Alastair Hay, an expert in environmental toxicology at Leeds University, said: “They have a variety of industrial uses. “But when you’re making a nerve agent, you attach a fluoride element and that’s what gives it its toxic properties. “Fluoride is key to making these munitions.


- Oh yeah. They wanted these lethal chemicals so they could make some windows and screendoors.......

K&R
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Revealed: Britain sold ne...