Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 12:46 PM Aug 2013

Court: Obama broke law with nuke delay

Source: The Hill

A federal court on Tuesday ruled that the Obama administration broke the law by delaying a decision on using the Yucca Mountain site in Nevada as a permanent nuclear waste dump.

In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) violated a 1982 federal law by halting its consideration of the project. It ordered the NRC to deny or approve the Energy Department’s application to store nuclear waste at the site.

The decision is a victory for Republicans, who have charged that President Obama’s 2010 decision to pull the plug on the reviews ran afoul of a law that outlines Yucca as the nation's sole waste storage site.

<snip>

The administration, including former NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko, contended that the NRC didn’t have the funds to complete the Yucca review. House Republicans have voted to appropriate more funds to complete the process, but those spending levels were never adopted.

<snip>

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/316797-obama-administration-must-rule-on-yucca-federal-court-says

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court: Obama broke law with nuke delay (Original Post) bananas Aug 2013 OP
Impeach him! Orrex Aug 2013 #1
If they could Helen Borg Aug 2013 #3
Dissenting judge: little more than ordering the NRC to unpack its boxes and pack them up again bananas Aug 2013 #2
Let the DU gloating begin!! George II Aug 2013 #4
2 Bush Judges and 1 Clinton Judge Ash_F Aug 2013 #5
^^^THIS^^^^. nt riqster Aug 2013 #7
Damn right! Cryptoad Aug 2013 #9
For the record. I don't agree with the above poster Ash_F Aug 2013 #10
How come Federal courts never rule that an Administration has broken the law Lugal Zaggesi Aug 2013 #6
Probably because courts don't get to pick what cases they decide jberryhill Aug 2013 #8
Never going to happen. MjolnirTime Aug 2013 #11
Simple solution ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #12

bananas

(27,509 posts)
2. Dissenting judge: little more than ordering the NRC to unpack its boxes and pack them up again
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 12:50 PM
Aug 2013
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/13/us-usa-courts-yucca-idUSBRE97C0IM20130813

<snip>

In a dissenting opinion, Chief Judge Merrick Garland said the lack of funds makes the court's ruling limited in impact because it amounts to "little more than ordering the commission to spend part of those funds unpacking its boxes, and the remainder packing them up again."

<snip>

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
5. 2 Bush Judges and 1 Clinton Judge
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 12:58 PM
Aug 2013

I knew it.

This is why we need to get our house in order so we can keep Dems in office for 20 years.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
9. Damn right!
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 01:42 PM
Aug 2013

We got lots bigger problems than NSA legally collecting meta data........ and it starts with a Gee and ends with a Pee. the GOP!

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
10. For the record. I don't agree with the above poster
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 01:45 PM
Aug 2013

About the NSA so don't couple me with that comment. Not trying to go off topic. Just gotta lay that out there.

 

Lugal Zaggesi

(366 posts)
6. How come Federal courts never rule that an Administration has broken the law
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 12:59 PM
Aug 2013

by illegally attacking a country based on willful misinterpretation of "intelligence" ?

They feel qualified to nitpick about little laws,
but won't touch the big issues with a 100' pole.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
8. Probably because courts don't get to pick what cases they decide
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 01:13 PM
Aug 2013

...with the exception of the Supreme Court. But even then, they can't just say, "Oh, we'd like to issue a ruling on X".

 

ConcernedCanuk

(13,509 posts)
12. Simple solution
Tue Aug 13, 2013, 11:15 PM
Aug 2013

.
.
.

Deny the Energy Department’s application to store nuclear waste at the site.

Put it beside Idiot-Son's place in Paraguay.

2 problems solved.

CC

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court: Obama broke law wi...