Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 04:35 PM Jul 2013

Hagel: Furloughs May Continue Next Year For DoD Employees

Source: Military Times

Jul. 21, 2013 - 03:37PM |

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, S.C. — The audience gasped in surprise and gave a few low whistles as Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel delivered the news that furloughs, which have forced a 20 percent pay cut on most of the military’s civilian workforce, probably will continue next year, and it might get worse.

“Those are the facts of life,” Hagel told about 300 Defense Department employees, most of them middle-aged civilians, last week at an Air Force reception hall on a military base in Charleston.

Future layoffs also are possible for the department’s civilian workforce of more than 800,000 employees, Hagel said, if Congress fails to stem the cuts in the next budget year, which starts Oct. 1.

On the heels of the department’s first furlough day, and in three days of visits with members of the Army,Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps, Hagel played the unenviable role of messenger to a frustrated and fearful workforce coping with the inevitability of a spending squeeze at the end of more than a decade of constant and costly war.

Read more: http://www.militarytimes.com/article/20130721/NEWS05/307210006/Hagel-Furloughs-may-continue-next-year-for-DoD-employees

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dusty trails

(174 posts)
1. Cuts in defense
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 05:17 PM
Jul 2013

I wish we'd stop manufacturing obsolete weapons (i.e tanks, etc) just because they're built in some congressman's back yard. The House this year passed a bill to buy more tanks that the Pentagon doesn't want/need.
If i recall correctly, they were manufactured in Boner's district?

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
2. A friends wife complaining about losing all her overtime...
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 05:39 PM
Jul 2013

Hagel is right, “Those are the facts of life,” you can't depend on extra money when those around you are losing weekly pay.

on point

(2,506 posts)
3. Cut defense by 50%. And we are on our way to balanced budget
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 05:43 PM
Jul 2013

Or tax the wealthy and corps more for protecting their interests!

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
7. Sure, mansions and servants for generals and admirals; golf courses for the military; high
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 06:17 PM
Jul 2013

pay for the officer corps.

underpants

(182,826 posts)
6. This won't affect defense contractors billing will it?
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 06:17 PM
Jul 2013

OH GOD tell me it won't affect defense contractors billing!!!!

pam4water

(2,916 posts)
9. Are they cutting the private contract firms that take up ~70% of the "National Security" Budget?
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 06:31 PM
Jul 2013

Because that would be progress.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
10. When I was in the Army "Furlough" meant ME getting 'free time'
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 06:39 PM
Jul 2013

Now it apparently means the Guv-mint "gets 20% of my time for free".

on point

(2,506 posts)
11. Incorrect. It means in this case you do not work or get paid for 20% of time.
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 07:41 PM
Jul 2013

guvmint doesn't get your work, and you don't get paid.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
12. New Oxford American says otherwise...
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 07:54 PM
Jul 2013
Furlough
noun

leave of absence, esp. that granted to a member of the armed services : a civil servant home on furlough | a six-week furlough in Australia.
• a temporary release of a convict from prison : a system that allowed murderers to leave prison for weekend furloughs.
• a layoff, esp. a temporary one, from a place of employment.

verb [ trans. ]
grant such leave of absence to.
• lay off (workers), esp. temporarily : President Reagan furloughed “nonessential” employees | [as adj. ] ( furloughed) factories are apt to recall some furloughed workers.

~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ * ~~~~ *
There is no mention either way about getting paid or not, but it seems to imply by silence that it is a paid leave, as was my 2-week furlough (paid leave) from the Army for Christmas. It wasn't like they "didn't pay" me for that time, because they did. That was in the 60's however, when the Army wasn't so stingy with it's troops.

on point

(2,506 posts)
15. Duh. You seem one monkey short of wisdom
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 09:22 PM
Jul 2013

Furlough when a company or guvmint lays you AND you don't get paid

Your understanding of this furlough is NOT CORRECT

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
16. ..Just because you say so?
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 09:27 PM
Jul 2013

Thanks but no thanks.

Actually, if anything, you are making my point. If that is what "furlough" NOW means
in the US Military (not like the 60's or according to New Oxford Dictionary) ipso facto
"just because they say so" <-- end of discussion.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hagel: Furloughs May Cont...