Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:35 AM Jul 2013

Judge turns down bid to end Guantánamo force-feeding

Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge Tuesday turned down a bid by three Guantánamo Bay detainees on a hunger strike to stop the government from force-feeding them.

Judge Rosemary M. Collyer ruled that she doesn't have jurisdiction in the case, because Congress has removed Guantánamo detainees' treatment and conditions of confinement from the purview of federal courts. She said there was "nothing so shocking or inhumane in the treatment" that would raise a constitutional concern.

Collyer wrote that even if she did have jurisdiction, she would deny the detainees' motion for an injunction.

While the effort is framed as a motion to stop force-feeding, the prisoners' "real complaint is that the United States is not allowing them to commit suicide by starvation," she wrote. She said that the United States cannot allow a person in custody to die of self-inflicted starvation, and that numerous courts have recognized the government's duty to prevent suicide and to provide life-saving nutritional and medical care to people in custody.

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/07/16/3502724/judge-turns-down-bid-to-end-gitmo.html

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge turns down bid to end Guantánamo force-feeding (Original Post) Freddie Stubbs Jul 2013 OP
The judge appears to be very selective in her reasoning to me. Vinnie From Indy Jul 2013 #1
Torture is the infliction of severe physical pain as a means of punishment or coercion Freddie Stubbs Jul 2013 #2
I'll tell you what: Comrade Grumpy Jul 2013 #9
It is preferable to letting them die of starvation Freddie Stubbs Jul 2013 #20
You really have no idea what is involved with a "forced feeding" do you? Vinnie From Indy Jul 2013 #10
It is preferable to letting them die of starvation Freddie Stubbs Jul 2013 #21
Preferable to whom? Vinnie From Indy Jul 2013 #24
. Ash_F Jul 2013 #12
It is preferable to letting them die of starvation Freddie Stubbs Jul 2013 #22
I hate this FirstLight Jul 2013 #3
Closing Gitmo has nothing to do with it. former9thward Jul 2013 #5
Except... FiveGoodMen Jul 2013 #14
That is treatment and conditions. former9thward Jul 2013 #17
FORCE SamKnause Jul 2013 #4
This judge is also a member of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The Stranger Jul 2013 #6
This judge also granted the CIA summary judgment on a FOIA request regarding drone strikes. The Stranger Jul 2013 #7
nt Mnemosyne Jul 2013 #8
What a cluster. Socal31 Jul 2013 #11
Judge is a Bushbot appointed by Bush Ash_F Jul 2013 #13
A Bushbot who upholds the actions of the Obama administration? Freddie Stubbs Jul 2013 #23
Sounds like the Obama administration is guilty of torture to me. forestpath Jul 2013 #15
I didn't like that they force-fed them in Ramadan Joe Hyperion Jul 2013 #16
K&R Vinnie From Indy Jul 2013 #18
Got to keep them alive dbackjon Jul 2013 #19

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
1. The judge appears to be very selective in her reasoning to me.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jul 2013

"that numerous courts have recognized the government's duty to prevent suicide and to provide life-saving nutritional and medical care to people in custody."

Would they insist that the inmates have open heart surgery for some malady? What about an organ transplant? Would the court also insist that an inmate be forced to undergo the ravages of chemotherapy if the inmate was opposed on personal or religious grounds?

The judge seems to be quite comfortable with torture. If it were a just world the judge would have to witness the forced feeding of the inmates.

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
2. Torture is the infliction of severe physical pain as a means of punishment or coercion
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:50 AM
Jul 2013

The force feedings are being done to stop the prisoners from starving to death.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
9. I'll tell you what:
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 01:21 PM
Jul 2013

I'll come over to your place, grab you in the middle of the night, tie a bag around your head, fly you thousands of miles from everything you know, imprison you for years with no trial or charges, forcibly restrain you, and then ram a tube down your throat against your will. Then you can tell me whether it's torture or not.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
10. You really have no idea what is involved with a "forced feeding" do you?
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 01:34 PM
Jul 2013

Here is a description from a doctor who has done thousands of these procedures.

"The procedure is this: after squirting a lubricant into one nostril, a two-foot long clear plastic tube of varying caliber, usually about as thick around as fat pencil, is snaked through the nose, down the back of the throat, and into the stomach. An X-ray is then performed to make certain the tube is placed correctly into the stomach or small intestine and not into the lung. Once confirmed, a liquid diet can be delivered and up to 2,000 calories a day provided—more than enough to keep a person alive.

Without question, it is the most painful procedure doctors routinely inflict on conscious patients. The nose—as anyone knows who ever has received a stinger from an errant baseball—has countless pain fibers. Some patients may scream and gasp as the tube is introduced; the tear ducts well up and overflow; the urge to sneeze or cough or vomit is often uncontrollable. A paper cup of water with a bent straw is placed before the frantic and miserable patient and all present implore him to Sip! Sip! in hopes of facilitating tube passage past the glottis and into the esophagus and stomach.

The procedure is, in a word, barbaric. And that’s when we are trying to be nice."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/02/the-writhing-miserable-reality-of-force-feeding-at-guant-namo-bay.html

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/07/10/200751527/why-doctors-oppose-force-feeding-guantanamo-hunger-strikers

FirstLight

(13,364 posts)
3. I hate this
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:01 AM
Jul 2013

what the HELL is wrong with this country? Those men have NO rights, not even to die... seriously, they have been in legal no man's land for a decade and they want OUT, I think they deserve to have the dignity to make that choice.
But if every inmate in Gitmo was to commit suicide, whether this way or by some other means, then there wouldn't be anyone left to torture.

Yes, Mr. President...YOU said you would CLOSE this horrific place during your FIRST TERM... remember?

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
5. Closing Gitmo has nothing to do with it.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:11 AM
Jul 2013

Gitmo is just a bunch of buildings. The issue is charge and try these people or release them. They can be released whether Gitmo stays open or not.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
14. Except...
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:05 PM
Jul 2013

"Judge Rosemary M. Collyer ruled that she doesn't have jurisdiction in the case, because Congress has removed Guantánamo detainees' treatment and conditions of confinement from the purview of federal courts."

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
17. That is treatment and conditions.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:58 PM
Jul 2013

The federal courts have every right to try them for whatever crimes they are charged with. That is the problem, the U.S. refuses to charge them with anything and they refuse to release them.

SamKnause

(13,110 posts)
4. FORCE
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:01 AM
Jul 2013

The government of the United States, with the backing of its military machine are the number one threat to this planet and its inhabitants.

The United States is a rogue nation.

The United States has decided it is above the law.

Anything the United States has done in foreign countries, or to the people in foreign countries, it will do at home and to its own citizens.

Empire building is a dirty business and it is evident the United States government is up to the task.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
6. This judge is also a member of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:49 AM
Jul 2013

Appointed by George W. Bush to the bench.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
7. This judge also granted the CIA summary judgment on a FOIA request regarding drone strikes.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 11:56 AM
Jul 2013
On January 13, 2010, the American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation (collectively, the ACLU) submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), seeking “records pertaining to the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (‘UAVs’) -- commonly referred to as‘drones’ . . . -- by the CIA and the Armed Forces for the purpose of killing targeted individuals.”
. . . .
On September 9, 2011, the district court granted the CIA’s motion for summary judgment. Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep’t of Justice, 808 F. Supp. 2d 280, 284 (D.D.C. 2011). The court agreed with the CIA that the existence vel non of responsive records was exempt under both Exemptions 1 and 3, and that there had been no official acknowledgment sufficient to override those exemptions. As a consequence, the court held, the CIA was not required to confirm or deny that it had any responsive records, let alone describe any specific documents it might have or explain why any such documents were exempt from disclosure. The ACLU filed a timely appeal.


American Civil Liberties Union v. Central Intelligence Agency, No. 1:10-CV-00436; in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Socal31

(2,484 posts)
11. What a cluster.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 01:54 PM
Jul 2013

This ball was dropped years ago, and nobody knows what to do.

If they are guilty, they should be in a US Federal Prison. If they are not, they should have been sent home. Now, even the innocent ones surely harbor insane resentment to this country, and who can blame them.

That is our problem as a country, not the prisoners'. Something needs to be done.

 

Joe Hyperion

(58 posts)
16. I didn't like that they force-fed them in Ramadan
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 03:14 PM
Jul 2013

That is their day of fast. It was an insensitive move in my view.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge turns down bid to e...