Netanyahu Criticizes ‘No Sense Of Urgency’ On Nuclear Iran
Last edited Sun Jul 14, 2013, 05:05 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Washington Post
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in an interview with CBS News airing Sunday, said the international community and the United States have no sense of urgency when it comes to Irans nuclear ambitions.
Netanyahu suggested the various conflicts in the Middle East have diverted the Wests attention and allowed Iran to move forward with pursuing a bomb.
I have a sense that theres no sense of urgency
on Iran, Netanyahu told CBSs Face the Nation, according to an advance transcript. And yet Iran is the most important, the most urgent matter of all.
Because all the problems that we have, however important, will be dwarfed by this messianic, apocalyptic, extreme regime that would have atomic bombs. It would make a terrible, catastrophic change for the world and for the United States.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/07/14/netanyahu-criticizes-no-sense-of-urgency-on-nuclear-iran/
PDJane
(10,103 posts)Because all the problems that we have, however important, will be dwarfed by this messianic, apocalyptic, extreme regime that would have atomic bombs. It would make a terrible, catastrophic change for the world and for the United States.
I thought that was Israel.....
WovenGems
(776 posts)Being crazy is no fun when one is alone. 'Tis a war weary world.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)...the alliance he is forming with the Saudis, UAE and Egyptian military. He's doing it behind our backs.
Our warning to him was exposing the July 5th raids on Latakia.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)tells the entire rest of the planet to fuck off and then can't get them to rally behind Israel.
byeya
(2,842 posts)bases on two sides of Iran and the 6th fleet patrolling the waters off Iran's coast.
WTF does Yoyo want? Well I guess that's obvious: More attacks on Iran followed by an all out invasion.
I don't think that's in the USA's national interest and oppose it.
I don't think adopting AIPAC's foreign policy is in the USA's national interest and oppose that too.
Steviehh
(115 posts)Sit down, Shut up and quit complicating things with bombing Russian supplies.
The world is waiting and your weapons are getting more obsolete everyday.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)". . . various conflicts in the Middle East have diverted the Wests attention and allowed Iran to move forward with pursuing a bomb."
Unlike Israel, which already has scores of nuclear weapons, and who regularly uses subtle (and occasionally not so subtle) threats of their potential use to intimidate and coerce her assumed enemies, principally Iran.
This is a game Netanyahu plays with skill, however, he has used the same tactic so often it is losing much of its effectiveness, even here, in the land of Israel's greatest proponents. Starting another Mid-East war, one which would likely be the worst yet, is not at all what the American people seem to desire. Now if he could arrange it so that Iran is seen to have attacked Israel first, that would be very different, very different indeed.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)Hell we can't even afford food stamps for our own people.