Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:27 PM Jul 2013

Russian Team Wins, US Places 11th at ‘Battle of the Brains’

Source: RIA Novosti

WASHINGTON, July 5 (RIA Novosti) – A crack squad of Russian computer programmers took advantage of the home terrain to win 1st prize at the world finals of The Association of Computing Machinery’s International Computer Programming Contest (ICPC) in St. Petersburg this week, while the highest placed American team narrowly missed out on the top ten.

The St. Petersburg National Research University of IT, Mechanics and Optics won the prestigious contest for the second year in a row. The top scoring US team was Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Mellon University, placing 11th.

The Association of Computing Machinery’s ICPC, also known as “The Battle of the Brains,” began as a contest held at Texas A&M University in 1970, but in 1997 IBM became sponsor and participation has since expanded by more than 1100 percent.

According to the official website, “This year, ICPC participation included 29,479 of the finest students and faculty in computing disciplines from 2,322 universities from 91 countries on six continents.”

Read more: http://en.rian.ru/world/20130705/182081101/Russian-Team-Wins-US-Places-11th-at-Battle-of-the-Brains.html



OUCH!!!
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russian Team Wins, US Places 11th at ‘Battle of the Brains’ (Original Post) Purveyor Jul 2013 OP
But were they really students? dkf Jul 2013 #1
American exceptionalism at its finest. USA!!! USA!!! Look at all that money we spend Nanjing to Seoul Jul 2013 #2
Might be all the poison we put on and in our food air and water. nineteen50 Jul 2013 #3
Don't expect it to last. William769 Jul 2013 #4
So we're not #1. demosincebirth Jul 2013 #5
Unless you're talking about incarceration dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #11
Video of the competitors: joshcryer Jul 2013 #6
Fun video! colorado_ufo Jul 2013 #10
11th is not "placing" alcibiades_mystery Jul 2013 #7
There were almost 50 competitors in the finals. joshcryer Jul 2013 #13
Congratulations to our winning team! bluedigger Jul 2013 #8
However, our team had the highest student debt of any contestants. nt AdHocSolver Jul 2013 #9
Congratulations to the Carnegie Mellon University team... Deuce Jul 2013 #12
Russia, Asia and Poland are strong jakeXT Jul 2013 #14
Generally, yes, but the big points are in the main program challenge. joshcryer Jul 2013 #15
We're secondvariety Jul 2013 #16
 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
2. American exceptionalism at its finest. USA!!! USA!!! Look at all that money we spend
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 11:29 PM
Jul 2013

on our military and our prisons. But pennies for our education.

AND HERE IS THE RESULT!!!!

William769

(55,147 posts)
4. Don't expect it to last.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 12:01 AM
Jul 2013

They are trying to dumb down their citizens. But then when your a nation of bigots what do you expect.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
13. There were almost 50 competitors in the finals.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 05:09 AM
Jul 2013

11 out of 46 isn't bad at all, especially considering that the US hasn't won since 1991. One could tout then that the US is tied with Russia in wins, but most of that was in the early years, when it was a primarily US event, which isn't exactly a fair metric, either.

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
14. Russia, Asia and Poland are strong
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 06:03 AM
Jul 2013
http://icpc.baylor.edu/download/worldfinals/problems/icpc2012.pdf

I noticed there are 12 problems from last years challenge.
Are the teams so big that each individual can solve one problem?

It probably is enough to write the code in one big chunk without structure. As long as it works with the test case, or are there other criteria?

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
15. Generally, yes, but the big points are in the main program challenge.
Sat Jul 6, 2013, 08:15 AM
Jul 2013

It's possible to write the main program challenge in one big chunk, but it's clear from the results that the Russian university students decided to work together on it. You can watch the replay of the program on the site. They actually accounted for every single scenario. There's no way one person came up with the result. No way in heck.

Interestingly, one program that made it the furthest kept to the "bottom level" gaining points, running back and forth, but the Russian program was everywhere, gaining points where ever possible. They really thought through the problem completely and didn't assume that there was an easy answer. This is actually a testament to the ACMs challenge program as much as the programmers itself.

It's really difficult to make a problem that isn't cheatable, or gamed by smart thinkers thinking about ways to get around the rules (in fact the rules changed a bit during the challenge, because some felt there were inconsistencies and some felt that the challenge program wasn't living up to its potential).

This was an excellent contest overall. I'm glad Carnegie Melon made it as far as they did. It wasn't an easy problem.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russian Team Wins, US Pla...