Panel votes to limit submissions to gun registry
Source: AP/Salon
WASHINGTON (AP) A House panel has approved legislation that would greatly curtail when veterans deemed mentally incompetent are reported to the FBIs gun-check registry.
The move to winnow what records get placed into the database comes even as both sides of the gun-control debate have called for strengthening the background-check system.
Currently, the Department of Veterans Affairs automatically submits the names to the FBIs database of those veterans who are deemed unable to handle their own financial affairs and have a fiduciary appointed to administer their benefits.
But the House Committee on Veterans Affairs approved legislation requiring a judges order before a veterans name is submitted to the database. Lawmakers said veterans who are not a threat to harm themselves or others should not be denied a constitutional right to buy and possess guns.
###
Read more: http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/panel_votes_to_limit_submissions_to_gun_registry/
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)dotymed
(5,610 posts)I don't think that a persons eligibility to own a gun should be based on their status as a veteran. That IS discrimination.
I do not agree with our "gun culture" but I do not think that discrimination is the answer.
TxGrandpa
(124 posts)"A House panel has approved legislation that would greatly curtail when veterans deemed mentally incompetent are reported to the FBIs gun-check registry."
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)bobclark86
(1,415 posts)"poses a threat to their own self or others."
TxGrandpa
(124 posts)My objection isn't against veterans as such, as I'm retired Army; but being mentally incompetent could cover a lot of ground. They should be treated the same as non-veteran civilians.
dotymed
(5,610 posts)I know disabled veterans who have to have someone designated to handle their financial affairs (who get their disability check). These people are often victims of TBI's from war. The ones that I know are incapable of being terrorists, they are usually too trusting and make easy financial targets. Often their families or friends that receive the disability checks, take advantage of them.
I do not think that disabled vets, incapable of handling their finances are the problem.
I have never heard of a terrorist in that category...
TxGrandpa
(124 posts)...but for those who shouldn't be able to buy weapons. But again it would depend on why a veteran is incompetent...mental problems, etc.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)not sure what all the outrage is about.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Apparently the difference is that for civilians who are not veterans, no governmental agency submits the names to the FBI's database of those who are deemed unable to handle their own financial affairs.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)a judge to decide if there is sufficient cause to deem a civilian incompetent. I can see no reason why a veteran should not be given the same consideration.
oNobodyo
(96 posts)but the fact that they are trained killers, likely suffering from PTSD and also a high likelihood of having brain damage gives me pause before I'd go and put them in the same category as the general public...and even with the general public I have big problems with the deterent/punish, let a judge/god sort it out after the fact mentality, when a gun really removes 'time to think' for people that often don't care any more whether they live or die.
The suicide and domestic violence rates for those returning from war alone...
The operative phrase here is "mentally incompetent"...Think for a moment what someone has to have gone through before they end up in that state.
They don't need guns, they need healing.