New Hampshire Republicans Propose Bill To Eliminate Workers’ Lunch Breaks
New Hampshire Republicans Propose Bill To Eliminate Workers Lunch Breaks
By Pat Garofalo on Feb 8, 2012 at 3:00 pm
New Hampshires GOP legislature has come up with all manner of absurd bills recently, including a proposal making public school curriculum optional, another to prevent police from protecting domestic abuse victims, and even a measure mandating that new laws be based on the Magna Carta. Some of the Granite States GOP lawmakers have even proposed doing away with the law that requires employers to give their workers time off for lunch, under the rationale that all employers will simply grant lunch breaks out of the goodness of their hearts:
This is an unneeded law, Republican state Representative Kyle Jones said. If I was to deny one of my employees a break, I would be in a very bad position with the companys human resources representative. If you consider that this is a very easy law to follow in that everyone already does it, then why do we need it? Our constituents have already proven that they have enough common sense to do this on their own.
MORE:
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/02/08/421510/new-hampshire-gop-repeal-lunch/
..............
Lunch breaks on the chopping block
Bill would leave it up to employers
By Ray Duckler / Monitor columnist
February 8, 2012
Mark MacKenzie, the state's AFL-CIO president, yesterday told Rep. JR Hoell of Dunbarton to give him a break.
Repeal the law requiring half-hour lunch breaks for employees after five straight hours of work?
Trust all bosses to do the right thing, all the time?
MacKenzie, who once fought fires and now fights for workers' rights, said pass the salad, not this bill.
"Quite frankly," MacKenzie said, "considering this is 2012, and I'm talking about the repeal of the lunch hour, this is outrageous."
MORE:
http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/310149/lunch-breaks-on-the-chopping-block?CSAuthResp=1328749296%3A520p641452tsg0gmrls01c0890%3ACSUserId%7CCSGroupId%3Aapproved%3AD96D9ECC79CD26463DFEBC6D5FFED77D&CSUserId=94&CSGroupId=1
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Mopar151
(9,983 posts)Mostly 'cuz they are working for ALEC, Grover Norquist, and the NRA - NOT for the people of NH.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)much is destroying your state now. What do you think? Are the people happy? Or do they realize they went to far? My heart goes out to you. Believe me I take happyness what is going on across this country. I live in Tn and we aren't there yet. However, give them time we have a republican governor and he likes doing things in the dark.
Mopar151
(9,983 posts)The Speaker, and his sidekick Bettencourt, are some nasty pieces of work. Out of state money will pour in here in the next election, from Rove's PAC and others like it.
Our top-notch Democratic Governor Lynch is stepping down at the end of this term, and that race will be messy, too.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Mopar151
(9,983 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)I know they will blame the democrats. You watch. Their legislatures are overrun with tea party yet that who will get blamed.
demosincebirth
(12,537 posts)Response to demosincebirth (Reply #2)
Tesha This message was self-deleted by its author.
nanabugg
(2,198 posts)Occulus
(20,599 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,620 posts)This idiot (and I'm being generous) thinks that bosses will do the right thing about lunch breaks out of the goodness of their hearts.
So, whatever happened to the (presumed) goodness in his?
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)that one of his two brain cells isn't working right and that's causing him all kinds of problems. Nowhere near the amount of problems he's trying to cause for all of his constituents, but still...........
Uncle Joe
(58,362 posts)There is no goodness in his heart, just lust for money and power.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)irisblue
(32,975 posts)i've worked at places that have "disciplined" me for having an "unathorized break"...i went to the bathroom. i was a college student and needed the money badly, but i didn't need it that badly, aren't lunch breaks & other breaks federally required?
AllyCat
(16,187 posts)What alternate reality do these nuts live in? Human resources represents the company, not the employee.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)pull a stunt like this!
This is why I DO NOT believe that the Tea Party is a grassroots organization! This was all planned, pure and simple. Look what they're doing re: redefining rape, defunding Planned Parenthood, etc.
Mopar151
(9,983 posts)The last election around here was uuugglllyy! So much venom and bile coming out of your radio on the way to work, that the dashboard was tryin' ta throw up.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and the result of electing people who have never worked an honest day in their lives
KansDem
(28,498 posts)"Out of the goodness of their hearts?" "OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF THEIR HEARTS??!!!"
We tried this nationally 30 years ago. Remember "trickle down?" Give the wealthy tax breaks so they will reinvest in the US...ostensibly "out of the goodness of their hearts?" Bush tax cuts 10 years ago were suppose to allow the wealthy to reinvest in the US "out of the goodness of their hearts?"
Enough!!! Return to pre-Reagan tax rates and let the Bush tax cuts expire! Make the wealthy pay their fare share! I'M SICK AND TIRED OF THIS COUNTRY TRYING TO FUNCTION "OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF THEIR HEARTS!!!
Amonester
(11,541 posts)"goodness" in their hearts, only unlimited greed.
The goodness of an employer's hearts argument has been proven false again and again. For some reason though they keep using it.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tesha This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)the free-staters have had a terrible influence.
We need to clean house this fall. Majorly. And we also need to make sure to keep republicans out of the governorship.
provis99
(13,062 posts)after all, we can trust the goodness of the hearts of the bosses not to enslave us, right? After all, it would put the businessman in a very bad position with the company's human resource representative!
1ProudAtheist
(346 posts)extra profit can they wring out of workers in another 30 minutes of work per day?
libinnyandia
(1,374 posts)Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)and rank among the top few states for seat belt usage.
I'm NOT saying that trusting employers to give workers lunch hours is a good thing.- this legislature of ours is beyond belief.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)Throckmorton
(3,579 posts)Traffic Lights discriminate against people on side streets
happyslug
(14,779 posts)Stop signs make intersections LOOK dangerous, while lights make them look "safe". The problem is if something look dangerous, people slow down and are more careful, when something looks safe they rely on what they believe makes something "safe" even at increase speed. Thus the quickest way to reduce accidents in an intersection is to take OUT the Red lights and install Stops signs, and the quickest way to INCREASE accidents is to take out the stop signs and install lights. To many people look at lights as a sign that they only have to watch the light, if it is green it is safe for them to go. Studies have consistently shown that NOT to be true. Thus if you want to increase traffic safety, take out all of the Red lights and replace them with Stop Signs (Yes, traffic jams will increase for it is for traffic flow that red lights are installed NOT traffic safety).
Thus the preferred way to get rid of Stop Signs is a Cloverleaf, but most highway departments prefer red lights for they are cheap to install compared to Cloverleafs, but all a ramp on a cloverleaf is a modified merge points where a yield sign replaces a stop sign. Red lights permit a lot of traffic to flow through an intersection for it makes the intersection LOOK safe, even when it is NOT. Just a comment that Red Lights should be replaced y Stop Signs if Traffic Safety is the primary concern of highway designers (and it is NOT, and never has been no matter how much highway departments claim otherwise).
vademocrat
(1,089 posts)Wow - is he really this stupid? Gee, why would you be in trouble with HR? Because it is against the law!
"This is an unneeded law, Republican state Representative Kyle Jones said. If I was to deny one of my employees a break, I would be in a very bad position with the companys human resources representative."
eyewall
(674 posts)My guess would be... none.
out of touch much?
Citizen Worker
(1,785 posts)interests of the workers. I prefer to call HR what it really is, Inhumane Resources.
Highway61
(2,568 posts)...What a bunch of scumbags. There is not a nickle's worth of difference between any of them...they are all scumbags in one form or another.
KT2000
(20,577 posts)my nephew worked in one of those oil change businesses. They were not given breaks for lunch. They did allow them to eat a sandwhich while they were working in the pit. Tuna with 10-40.
If they didn't like it they could get a job somewhere else!!
eyewall
(674 posts)KT2000
(20,577 posts)for the digestive part though (he did quit).
christx30
(6,241 posts)but it keeps vital internal organs performing well, and prevents thermal breakdown, which is the #1 cause of death in the united states.
Do everything you can to stop rust. Keep your radiators topped off, and check your coolant levels every 3 months, when you check your oil.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Citizen Worker
(1,785 posts)the "shape up" of yesteryear.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)This is more union busting.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Prior to unions there was child labor and deaths because of accidents and over working.
LarryNM
(493 posts)AllyCat
(16,187 posts)kpete
(71,993 posts)peace, kpete
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Instead, most people here seem to merely want to cut the number of workers my field has... thus reducing my chances of getting lunch breaks.
So yeah, my "sympathy" is pretty limited.
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Now get back to work and don't even think about passing out from hunger.
Tripod
(854 posts)Insane, we are all working for less money then we did ten, and twenty years ago... WTF! I'm angered when I hear such BS!
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)...creeps. And of all the fucking nerve.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)I mean isn't it a "regulation" that is overblown. So now the bosses won't look bad to Human Resource if they no long exist. We'll just rename it The hiring and firing dept.
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)This could possibly be that NH GOP will shoot themselves in the foot.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)etc. if they do any lunch time business. Then ask them what would happen w/o that business.
Neighboring town decided to move its high school out in the middle of no where. At the old school the kids went down the main street hitting pizza, chinese, deli's etc. at lunch time. Now its like a ghost town and business fell off.
Heartless bastages...cut off their noses to spite their faces.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)They never think beyond their initial "great" idea.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)give a rat's ass.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Social Darwinism in action.
i once had to plead with a judge to take a lunch break. I was the court reporter. The person who sits in front of the witness stand and bangs on a Stenograph. He didn't want to give me one, being a control freak.
I told him, "My Doctor's name is ___, I can give you his phone number. Would you like to call him and talk to him about my need to eat meals?"
That was so humiliating, but I did get 30 minutes to eat.
Both the attorneys at the hearing, who were two of the best lawyers in the city, complimented me on the way I pled my case.
I was pissed that I had to argue with a district judge in the first place.
Solly Mack
(90,767 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)We don't need labor laws at all, because of the awesome, and terrible might of the HR rep! Quick! Someone get Valerie down in HR a scepter and a crown! She now has nearly absolute power. She is taking on the role of government.
Question is: What happens if the HR rep isn't doing his or her job and enforcing breaks and lunches? Who can workers turn to? Not the government. They are abdicating their responsibility to Valerie.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Management Team. He or she would be one unemployed HR person if they went against their own boss on this issue...
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)This is beyond absurd.....
Vinca
(50,273 posts)Why, oh why, oh why, did I buy a house in New Hampshire way back when?
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Really! Dude.... Vermont was just over there.....
Vinca
(50,273 posts)But . . . whenever we sell . . . it'll definitely be for a move to Vermont.
kaffy4x4
(49 posts)of the attack on state labor laws, now that the Congress has made it near impossible to organize for a Union by passing the FCC Reauthorization Act this week.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Kyle and his ilk don't seem to realize that it's a LAW because bosses WEREN'T giving their workers lunch breaks and had to be forced to do so.
He thinks these things just happen spontaneously.... I guess...
like street lights just grow out of the ground. And firemen and police pop into existence due to... quantum fluctuations perhaps?
Teabaggers are dumbfucks who think things have always been like today, and the stuff that makes their lives so nice they take for granted and don't realize they were usually fought for by liberals and opposed by conservatives. Things like clean water, untainted food, roads and bridges, etc etc
AllyCat
(16,187 posts)in many of the schools. So they can pull BS like this without anyone knowing. Except some of us DID read in social studies and history class way back when...
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)There is absolutely no pushback against the galloping fascism
Uncle Joe
(58,362 posts)it's just a matter of time.
Thanks for the thread, kpete.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)these people are sick!
alterfurz
(2,474 posts)xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)employers 'out of the goodness' policies. Let's get rid of 8 hour work days; child labor restrictions; dangerous/unhealthy work place conditions; safety gear.
Employers will place soooo much value in their employees all those policies will be followed anyway out of the goodness of their little black hearts.
Cyrano
(15,041 posts)They're allowed to drink water on the job. They're allowed to breathe air on the job.
Who knows what they'll demand next?
aquart
(69,014 posts)aquart
(69,014 posts)Better yet, punch a time clock?
Pretty please, can we pay them by the hour?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Between this and the assault on birth control...
I almost have to wonder if they are trying to lose.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)for a state of 1.2 million. And they're paid only a per diem. Imagine how many crackpots there'd be in Congress if there were a proportional 100,000 seats and no pay!
Response to KamaAina (Reply #74)
Tesha This message was self-deleted by its author.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)And now these asswipes want to take away lunch breaks????
You know I think secretly they want Obama to be reelected!
Damn I cant wait for the teabag nominee to run on the platform of NO lunch breaks! All poor kids scrub toilets and the outlawing of birth control!
While the economy steadily improves...
Its gonna be a democratic LANDSLIDE people!
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)instead of the people who actually do the work of the company
glinda
(14,807 posts)money and time? Everything costs. All these bizarre rules Conservatives are putting up cost time, money, etc....
Icicle
(121 posts)...what they're doing. Take the assets of the government (owned by the people) and gift it to private, usually corporate, interests.
It is theft.
glinda
(14,807 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)$ 15 million lawsuit against a company that did not respect the lunch hour in the contract.
So, no, employers will not respect what is common sense. In fact even if they have a federal contract that pays the company for it, they will still try and take it away.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Fuck them.
and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)The entire gop needs to be sent over a cliff in a burning bus.
LadyInAZ
(172 posts)Too funny... Human Resource was designed to protect the company interests and represent the employees... However, in my 15 years of my profession I've never seen HR put the people first... Reason why this is too funny... they have not a clue... goes to show you Teabaggers needs no representive to run for office of any government posting... if they controlled we will return this country back to when the 1st 13 colonies settled...