U.S. Attorney General Says Kansas Gun Law Is Unconstitutional.
Source: nyt/reuters
A recently enacted law in Kansas intended to block enforcement of federal gun regulations is unconstitutional, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder wrote in a letter released on Thursday.
The law, which seeks to keep guns or ammunition from being subject to any federal regulation - as long they are kept in Kansas - directly conflicts with federal law, Holder wrote in the April 26 letter to Kansas Governor Sam Brownback.
"Federal officers who are responsible for enforcing federal laws and regulations in order to maintain public safety cannot be forced to choose between the risk of a criminal prosecution by a state and the continued performance of their federal duties," Holder wrote.
The law also bans federal or other agents from enforcing federal regulations in the making or sale of Kansas-made firearms.
Holder said a state "may not criminalize the exercise of federal responsibilities" and that all federal laws remain in effect.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/05/02/us/02reuters-usa-kansas-guns.html?hp
broadcaster75201
(387 posts)Hell, I learned that in High School Government class.
elleng
(130,974 posts)MANY don't.
David__77
(23,423 posts)The state is under no obligation to enforce federal law, but they cannot criminalize federal enforcement of federal law. It is as with medical marijuana.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)Ter
(4,281 posts)At least be consistent, instead he's a hypocrite.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)There is no federal law disagreeing with the New York requirements.
So, logic fail.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)How are the two things otherwise legally related in your mind?
hack89
(39,171 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)I don't like guns, but you can't say Colorado and Washington are fine to allow marijuana freely against federal law and Kansas isn't ok here.