McCaskill Won’t Rule Out Putting Boots On The Ground In Syria
Source: TPM
PEMA LEVY 11:37 AM EDT, SUNDAY APRIL 28, 2013
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) said Sunday that we should leave all options on the table with regard to the situation in Syria, including sending in troops.
"I don't think you want to ever rule it out," McCaskill said of putting boots on the ground in Syria on CBS' "Face the Nation." "Obviously, we don't want to do that unless it's absolutely necessary."
McCaskill cited the deteriorated situation in Syria as well as the potential involvement of Iran and Hezbollah as a reason to never say never.
Conversely, Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), appearing alongside McCaskill, said he is willing to rule out sending in American troops. "I would go even beyond that, I would say no," Chambliss said, weighing in after McCaskill. "We don't need to put boots on the ground but we need to enable their neighbors, the neighbors of Syria, to bring some sort of peaceful resolution to this," he said.
###
Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mccaskill-wont-rule-out-putting-boots-on-ground
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)ETA: Some people can always be counted upon, can't they?
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)we'll be using their credit card to cover it, right?
Then, go for it. They can pay it back, just like we have, with lots of interest over an indefinite period of time and, hey, cutback on spending a little, ya' know.
donquijoterocket
(488 posts)NOT,And she'd be one of the first to complain about the cost in blood and treasure. McCaskill is apparently not very smart. Just smart enough to beat the obstetrician Akin.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)My first thought was, love ya, but you ain't in charge of that. No more than Rand Paul is President, except in his own imagination when telling Hillary he'd fire her...
still_one
(92,190 posts)Lives and bankrupted the country
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)She can strap on those boots herself, throw on some body armor, and go fight Mr. Badguyofthisweek herself if she so chooses, but I'd rather she leave other people out of it.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)could on your other OPs. I am enraged by this blatant
drumbeat to war.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)thanks for the heads up!
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)midnight
(26,624 posts)ground, while expecting the rest of the poor in this country to live in austerity is to put more American Children at risk for becoming
homeless....
alp227
(32,021 posts)Remember "legitimate rape"? If Akin won, he'd win the "dumb or dumber" contest because of that comment alone.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)Goofballs like me see it as a way to fix the "sequester" for the military and the broods of defense contractors affixed to its copious teats spewing golden milk. I mean, you can hear the squeaky, repetitive sucking sound if you listen carefully.
We have to keep that armored cow well-fed with our National wealth and mandatory contributions to the biggest, baddest, meanest, most-high tech, money-is-no-object approach to defensive offense the planet has ever seen. It is virtually inserted into our way of life and you can't stop it or kick it out when it has that much clout, advanced weaponry and even WMD's at its disposal. I'm not implying that it would turn around and aim it all at us, but you just don't mess with anything that armed and dangerous.
Oh, yeah, MIC would not let it's own budget get cut, some say, so there is no MIC in control. Really? Well, it won't take much to get it back and then we all are supposed to say, "Hurray!" But there WAS some budget cutting and was is enough.
Response to Newest Reality (Reply #11)
Alamuti Lotus This message was self-deleted by its author.
alp227
(32,021 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)It seems small.
Open Secrets doesn't seem to have a way to find out about related parties and how money or jobs can be pushed in their direction.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Use drones to take out all the missle firing heles and tanks.
Do NOT start handing out our federal funds to private for profit war contractors. "enable their neighbors" means give them arms.
as the republican said "Chambliss said, weighing in after McCaskill. "We don't need to put boots on the ground but we need to enable their neighbors, the neighbors of Syria, to bring some sort of peaceful resolution to this," he said.
AndyA
(16,993 posts)You'll have to find the money FIRST, Sen. McCaskill. Since the wealthy own the companies that will benefit most from any military contracts for another war, they shouldn't have any problems with having their taxes raised to pay for it, right?
bowens43
(16,064 posts)tell me again what the difference is between Dems and cons.
donquijoterocket
(488 posts)the elemental mistake of breaking things into Dems and cons. Some Dems can be as rock-ribbed conservative as anyone else.Used to be that some Republicans could be as liberal as anyone else but the Tpottiers have pretty much driven them to extinction within the modern Republican party.
juajen
(8,515 posts)Let someone else pay for this, in soldiers and money. Not USA. Haven't we learned anything? Let me see, Russia supports Assad, so, here we go again. No! No! No!
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)(_!_)
Alamuti Lotus
(3,093 posts)pasto76
(1,589 posts)is a way to present a unified front to the syrian regime. So when a US state department envoy and/or secretary of state goes to negotiate, they appear to have a unified government and therefore people behind that negotiation. Its not a bluff per se, but some chest thumping, staring down, sabre rattling.
thats what the "authorization to use force against iraq" vote was about too. Bush took that and ran all over the place with it. That is, truly, one of his biggest and deepest betrayals of eveyone's trust, including this soldier.
what chambliss said, actively undermines any efforts by our state department to seek an end to this.
we dont even have money for training right now really. another war/peacekeeping venture is seriously, quite a long shot.
BootinUp
(47,144 posts)not by me though.
Thank you for your service.
John2
(2,730 posts)again, why the U.S. is supporting one side or the other? I just want to have a clear understanding and why they have called for Assad to resign?
pampango
(24,692 posts)Amnesty International: While it is clear that the vast majority of war crimes and other gross violations continue to be committed by government forces, Amnesty Internationals research points to an escalation in abuses by armed opposition groups, which have increasingly resorted to hostage taking and to the torture and summary killing of soldiers, pro-government militias and civilians.
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/keep-international-pressure-against-abuses-syria-2013-03-26
We tended to see mainly the authoritarian governments, whose grip was never in doubt, even when they tolerated a controlled pluralism, cautiously independent print media, and a fragile civil society. What we undervalued were rising expectations on the demand side, which subsequently fired the 2011 upheavals, during which thousands of peaceful demonstrators gave their lives in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Bahrain.
Even in Syria and Libyawhere the governments were among the regions most brutalhuman rights contestation picked up during the past decade.
http://www.hrw.org/world-report-2012/arab-spring-unseen-thaw
Then we have the problem of Democratic presidents making speeches as if they actually cared what happens to people in other countries.FDR's 1945 inaugural speech:
We have learned that we cannot live alone, at peace; that our own well-being is dependent on the well-being of other nations far away. We have learned that we must live as men, not as ostriches, nor as dogs in the manger.
We have learned to be citizens of the world, members of the human community.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/primary-resources/fdr-fourth-inaugural/
JFK's inaugural adress in 1961:
To those people in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required ...
... a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, "rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation," a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkinaugural.htm
Obama upon the arrival of the four bodies from the Benghazi attack
Thats the message these four patriots sent. Thats the message that each of you sends every day -- civilians, military -- to people in every corner of the world, that America is a friend, and that we care not just about our own country, not just about our own interests, but about theirs; that even as voices of suspicion and mistrust seek to divide countries and cultures from one another, the United States of America will never retreat from the world. We will never stop working for the dignity and freedom that every person deserves, whatever their creed, whatever their faith.
Thats the essence of American leadership. Thats the spirit that sets us apart from other nations. This was their work in Benghazi, and this is the work we will carry on.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/14/remarks-president-transfer-remains-ceremony-benghazi-victims
It's a tough combination. A brutal dictator, people who have had enough and a country which, sincerely or not, professes regularly to care what happens to people who work for freedom and human dignity.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)an even more repressive religious government. We need to stay out of lose/lose situations, especially when we are broke.
VA_Jill
(9,966 posts)Claire and the rest of the saber-rattlers didn't learn a damn thing from Vietnam about getting involved in someone else's civil war.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)of course money suddenly becomes available for poking our nose into other countries.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)or will we get to that bothersome part later?
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)"leave all options on the table"
That only means 'war'
marble falls
(57,081 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)With or without a combat boot.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Paid for by borrowing your Social Security Trust Fund $$$