Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,905 posts)
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 11:06 PM Apr 2013

Obama Nominates Antitrust Expert Shelanski as New Regulatory Czar.

Source: nyt/reuters

President Barack Obama said on Thursday he would pick Howard Shelanski, an antitrust expert, as his new regulatory czar, a powerful White House position charged with reviewing regulations proposed by government departments.

Shelanski, who is both an economist and a lawyer, is currently in charge of a team of economists that reviews competition and consumer protection issues at the Federal Trade Commission.

He was described by lawyers who know him as a sophisticated analyst who has a pragmatic approach gained from spending time in the trenches of a government agency.

"In my opinion, he's a home run," said William Eskridge, law professor at Yale University, who praised Shelanski for his intellect.

The regulatory czar is formally called the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or OIRA - a body within the White House budget office.

Shelanski would replace Cass Sunstein, a well known and often controversial author who left the White House in August to return to teach at Harvard Law School.

During Sunstein's tenure, the White House came under fire from environmental groups for thwarting regulations that were deemed to cost too much, including killing a smog rule proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/04/25/us/politics/25reuters-usa-obama-regulations.html?hp

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Nominates Antitrust Expert Shelanski as New Regulatory Czar. (Original Post) elleng Apr 2013 OP
This is so funny. bahrbearian Apr 2013 #1
'Funny?' elleng Apr 2013 #2
With credentials like these, who couldn't laugh? Fuddnik Apr 2013 #3
He clerked for SCALIA???? hedda_foil Apr 2013 #4
Before we develop undeserved preconceived notions, consider this: Veilex Apr 2013 #6
Doesn't sound very Scaliaish to me.. thanks Veilex.. Cha Apr 2013 #9
$100 wow ...maybe that was just political. L0oniX Apr 2013 #13
Maybe and maybe not... Veilex Apr 2013 #14
He might not be so bad...Here's some snips of his work at Berkeley... KoKo Apr 2013 #12
Cue RW obstruction in 3... 2... 1... freshwest Apr 2013 #5
To my mind, "Shelanski was a clerk for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia" snot Apr 2013 #7
The fallacy in this line of thinking is that... Veilex Apr 2013 #15
Spare me... mimi85 Apr 2013 #8
Thanks elleng. Bet, there's a lot more to Howard Shelanski than Cha Apr 2013 #10
Of course there is, Cha, elleng Apr 2013 #11
Sorry; not so. snot May 2013 #16

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
3. With credentials like these, who couldn't laugh?
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 11:36 PM
Apr 2013

Shelanski is an affable person who is skilful at persuasion, said David Balto, a public-interest antitrust lawyer who said he has frequently found himself on the losing end of the argument.

"He has never agreed with anything I have ever proposed!" said Balto, policy director at the Federal Trade Commission during the Clinton administration.

"He's the kind of person who knows how to work well with people of very different perspectives and reach agreement," said Balto.

Shelanski was a clerk for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. He spent a decade on the faculty of the University of California at Berkeley. He also worked as the chief economist at the Federal Communications Commission and was a White House economist during the Clinton administration.

 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
6. Before we develop undeserved preconceived notions, consider this:
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 01:21 AM
Apr 2013

He contributed $100 to the marriage equality ballot in california. Here's the link:
http://www.followthemoney.org/database/StateGlance/contributor_details.phtml?t=1&c=3347&d=1484632402

Its not to say he's gold or a bad apple... but its one thing in his favor...if you know something we don't, please post links with verifiable information please... not suppositions.

(Edited to add link...oops)

Cha

(297,228 posts)
9. Doesn't sound very Scaliaish to me.. thanks Veilex..
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 03:18 AM
Apr 2013
Contributions to NO ON 8 EQUALITY FOR ALL From SHELANSKI, HOWARD

Total number of records: 1
Total amount: $100
 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
14. Maybe and maybe not...
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 12:49 PM
Apr 2013

But until we have more concrete information, all we can realistically do is take it at face value.
If you have any information, links or citations showing it was political, please, by all means, post it
so the rest of us may make a more informed judgment based on available facts.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
12. He might not be so bad...Here's some snips of his work at Berkeley...
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 08:53 AM
Apr 2013

(I read the panel discussion with him on "Big Box Stores" and it was a good discussion if anyone wants to check it out. He at least is aware of the issues that concern many Dems about Walmart gouging farmers and the transition in how we eat today and how Grocery Consolidation has an effect on both rural and urban areas. It's a good read.)

------------

In the News--Berkeley Law Blogs:
Howard Shelanski in the news:

Howard Shelanski Discusses Impact of ‘Big-Box’ Grocery Stores

Daily Yonder, January 5, 2011
http://www.dailyyonder.com/price-groceries/2011/01/04/3109

“One important contributor, other than mergers and acquisitions, to the increased volume and share of the top 20 retailers over the past two decades has been the rapid growth of what are often called nontraditional grocery retailers like Walmart, Target and Costco.”


Howard Shelanski Says New Administration Will Pursue Antitrust Law Enforcement

Forum with Michael Krasny, May 12, 2009 Host Michael Krasny
http://www.kqed.org/epArchive/R905120900

“I think what we see now is a clear statement by the Justice Department that it will be less concerned about the stakes of over-enforcement; that it is more concerned by the stakes of under-enforcement, and will pursue monopolization conduct more aggressively than in the past.”


Howard Shelanski Calls New UCDC Law Program “Indispensable”

The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes, March 9, 2009 by Eric Barendsen
http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/03/cali-law-interns-find-career-options-in-dc.html

“They get the opportunity to see their law degree as something that would help them be involved with policymaking, not simply litigation, not simply advocacy,” says professor and founder of the program Howard Shelanski of U.C. Berkeley School of Law.


Christopher Edley, Stephen Bundy, and Howard Shelanksi Say New Faculty Hire Will Help Boost Bar-Pass Rate

The Recorder, April 24, by Petra Pasternak
http://www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=1208947728506

“Though our first-time pass rates remain markedly higher than the overall pass rate for ABA-accredited law schools, we do not regard the 2007 results as acceptable,” Edley wrote in a memo to third-year students and LL.M.s on April 17. “We do not yet know whether those results reflect statistical variation or real changes in preparedness among our graduates.”

Howard Shelanksi noted that 82 percent is not bad compared with the overall pass rates for the California bar. But that’s little comfort to Boalt students, he added. “We want to push back up to our historic levels of bar-pass.”

“The bar is the mother of all closed-book in-class exams,” Bundy said. “I think the hiring of Kristen [Holmquist] provides a chance for us to look at the way these issues play out through the curriculum.”

Howard Shelanski Predicts Close Scrutiny of Microsoft-Yahoo Deal

TheStreet.com, Feb. 1, by Alexei Oreskovic
http://www.thestreet.com/s/microsoft-yahoo-await-antitrust-scrutiny/newsanalysis/technet/10401720.html?puc=_tscs

Howard Shelanski says that regardless of whether the Microsoft-Yahoo deal is ultimately approved, the deal’s size and complexity means it will likely prompt regulators to extend the initial 30-day review period for an additional six months…. “These firms are both major players, and there’s certainly some horizontal overlap,” says Shelanski. “There are many other markets involved here” … and each market needs to be evaluated on its own merits.
http://inthenews.berkeleylawblogs.org/category/howard-shelanski/

snot

(10,529 posts)
7. To my mind, "Shelanski was a clerk for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia"
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 02:26 AM
Apr 2013

means he's probably the opposite of what we need.

 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
15. The fallacy in this line of thinking is that...
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 01:00 PM
Apr 2013

There are plenty of good people out there working for other people with questionable ethics and practices. Chances are good that you yourself either are, or have worked for someone you ideologically or fundamentally disagree with... just based on the fact that your posting on this board.

I know the knee-jerk reaction is we see Antonin Scalia's name, and we immediately want nothing to do with him... but consider that a clerk is just a clerk. He has a job to do like anyone else, regardless of personal feelings. Most people will do whatever job it is they have, because they need the money... again, just like everyone else.

Its entirely probable that he is just another guy who appears to be fairly knowledgeable... and has made at least one step in the correct direction.

mimi85

(1,805 posts)
8. Spare me...
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 03:03 AM
Apr 2013

he's just fine. Damn, you are all fine when...... this Californian is just fine. So tired of pointing fingers.

elleng

(130,905 posts)
11. Of course there is, Cha,
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 03:22 AM
Apr 2013

and clerking for a Supreme only means that one knows how to do research and write.

snot

(10,529 posts)
16. Sorry; not so.
Thu May 9, 2013, 04:00 AM
May 2013

I agree that no firm conclusions can be drawn based solely on who employed one. But judicial clerkships are extremely competitive, and Scalia doesn't strike me as the type to go out of his way to hire someone with attitudes incompatible with his own.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama Nominates Antitrust...