Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 06:50 PM Apr 2013

Slow is scary if France quits nuclear : state institute

Source: Reuters

A long slow retreat from nuclear power in France or indecision over policy could be very risky as skilled staff retire and young people reject careers with an uncertain future, the state-funded atomic safety research institute said.

If France does decide to pull out of atomic energy it should follow Germany's example and do it quickly, or face operating with inadequate personnel, said Jacques Repussard, who heads the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN).

"You can't spread the exit of nuclear over half a century. It's very dangerous," he said, adding that this consideration partly explained Germany's decision to opt for a fast exit to avoid a loss of skills.

France's state-owned utility EDF, which operates its 58 nuclear reactors, faces a wave of retirements and will have to replace half its nuclear staff by 2017-18.

<snip>

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/slow-scary-france-quits-nuclear-state-institute-154437859--finance.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slow is scary if France quits nuclear : state institute (Original Post) bananas Apr 2013 OP
If both France and the Czech Republic did both do it quickly dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #1
No it is not that reliant RobertEarl Apr 2013 #2
Nope. Better check again. mbperrin Apr 2013 #4
But you don't even need a high school diploma to run Japan's nuclear plants. Obviously. valerief Apr 2013 #3
I just had this visual of Homer Simpson on vacation formercia Apr 2013 #5

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. If both France and the Czech Republic did both do it quickly
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 06:55 PM
Apr 2013

it would completely fuck Germany. Germany's policy is completely reliant on imports from both countries.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
2. No it is not that reliant
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 07:19 PM
Apr 2013

They have options especially renewables. Everyone does and big power is going down. Closing all nukes is a very wise proposition. Doing so now, before they melt, costing a trillion like Fukushima, is smart.

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
4. Nope. Better check again.
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 09:47 PM
Apr 2013

Nuclear is the filthiest, most dangerous, most expensive, most subsidized method of boiling water ever invented.

I know. I live just a half hour from the newest dump for their waste, which all liability is taken by the state of Texas, while all the profits are taken by Harold Simmons. So the vampire waste being shipped from Washington State to here won't die and neither will the taxpayer dollars to bury it and rebury it.

Texas has 26% of all our electricity provided by wind now, and in two months when the new transmission lines are complete, and the mothballed generators are allowed to run, 50%. And done in less than 10 years.

We'd have been way ahead to have never built a single nuke plant, anywhere.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
3. But you don't even need a high school diploma to run Japan's nuclear plants. Obviously.
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 07:42 PM
Apr 2013

Otherwise, they wouldn't break so easily.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Slow is scary if France q...