Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 09:55 AM Apr 2013

Obama accused of nuclear U-turn as guided weapons plan emerges

Source: Guardian

Barack Obama has been accused of reneging on his disarmament pledges after it emerged the administration was planning to spend billions on upgrading nuclear bombs stored in Europe to make the weapons more reliable and accurate.

Under the plan, nearly 200 B61 gravity bombs stockpiled in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Turkey would be given new tail fins that would turn them into guided weapons that could be delivered by stealth F35 fighter-bombers.

"This will be a significant upgrade of the US nuclear capability in Europe," said Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of Nuclear Scientists. "It flies directly in the face of the pledges Obama made in 2010 that he would not deploy new weapons."

In its Nuclear Posture Review in 2010, the US undertook to do reduce the role and numbers of its nuclear weapons, in part by not developing new nuclear warheads, and pledging it would not "support new military missions or provide for new military capabilities".

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/21/obama-accused-nuclear-guided-weapons-plan

129 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama accused of nuclear U-turn as guided weapons plan emerges (Original Post) dipsydoodle Apr 2013 OP
No surprise here, Obama rarely does what promises he will do..... bowens43 Apr 2013 #1
+ + byeya Apr 2013 #29
Wrong. Ian David Apr 2013 #44
Has He Stopped The Wars - Prosecuted Wall Street - And On And On .... cantbeserious Apr 2013 #49
He just hasn't kept the promises that are most important to you, and to many of us. Ian David Apr 2013 #54
That's The Point - On The Most Important Issues - He Has Not Delivered On Expected Changes And Action cantbeserious Apr 2013 #55
And some of those aren't his fault. For example, closing Gitmo. Ian David Apr 2013 #63
"The other guy would be worse." "He's not a king." woo me with science Apr 2013 #87
well aren't you a turd in the koolaid bowl Doctor_J Apr 2013 #110
Excuses not only don't fly, they don't even taxi out to the runway byeya Apr 2013 #116
Why Is It Acceptable To Live In A Country Where We Always Have To Choose Between Lesser Evils? cantbeserious Apr 2013 #93
47? Doctor_J Apr 2013 #90
He has a special talent for shattering the hopes and dreams of his base. Peregrine Took Apr 2013 #70
But sensible people agree our MIC is the most important thing in the budget jsr Apr 2013 #2
What a nightmare this guy has turned into. What the fuck. nt Poll_Blind Apr 2013 #3
Agreed - Fool Me Once Shame On Me - Fool Me Twice - Don't Get Fooled Again - GW Bush cantbeserious Apr 2013 #8
Astoundingly true. Peregrine Took Apr 2013 #71
wtf is right. 840high Apr 2013 #120
It's good anotherone Apr 2013 #128
I am so disappointed, I'm sick. damn it. n/t SylviaD Apr 2013 #129
that article has an obvious editorial slant to it IMO OKNancy Apr 2013 #4
who is doing the "accusing"? dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #6
I re-read and didn't get my edit in before your response OKNancy Apr 2013 #9
Part of a budget in some shape or form I guess. dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #10
I think that should be Federation of American Scientists. bananas Apr 2013 #91
du rec. nt xchrom Apr 2013 #5
U.S. SamKnause Apr 2013 #7
I agree with everything you said newfie11 Apr 2013 #12
"it is embarrasing to be an American" darkangel218 Apr 2013 #14
So You Are Proud Of America Today? - Trying To Understand This Point Of View cantbeserious Apr 2013 #15
Yes i am! darkangel218 Apr 2013 #17
We Will Have To Agree To Disagree - Our Points Of View Are Wildly Divergent - Enjoy The Cheerleading cantbeserious Apr 2013 #18
Whatever. nt darkangel218 Apr 2013 #19
Enjoy The Day! cantbeserious Apr 2013 #21
You too! darkangel218 Apr 2013 #22
I Always Enjoy The Day - But Then I Am Not A Cheerleader For Indefensible Policies Or Politicians cantbeserious Apr 2013 #23
Im a cheerleader for my country. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #39
We Can Tell - Too Bad One Is Not Willing To Learn And Expand Their Knowledge cantbeserious Apr 2013 #43
Yah. Like making a distinction between politicians and AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THEIR LAND! darkangel218 Apr 2013 #48
That Distinction Is Without Merit When The People Vote For Politicians Placating Corporations cantbeserious Apr 2013 #50
This has got to be the most idiotic bitchkitty Apr 2013 #126
USA, USA, We're #1 , We're #1 bahrbearian Apr 2013 #24
The Most Honest Three Minutes Of Televison cantbeserious Apr 2013 #26
Honesty SamKnause Apr 2013 #37
LOL. "My country, right or wrong." PSPS Apr 2013 #33
Amerika: Fix it or fuck it! Fuddnik Apr 2013 #47
Its a vast world and the borders are open. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #51
And Under Corporate Control, Enabled By Corrupt Politicians - Who Can Afford To Leave - Only The 1% cantbeserious Apr 2013 #58
I dont know, you seem pretty unhappy here. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #59
Dream On - In My America Cash Is King - If You Are The 99% - You Lose cantbeserious Apr 2013 #94
What stops you from leaving then? darkangel218 Apr 2013 #96
No Cash - I Am Not A Member Of The 1% - Just A Corporate Chattel Wage Slave Like Most Americans cantbeserious Apr 2013 #98
And if you.had money you.would leave? darkangel218 Apr 2013 #99
New Zealand cantbeserious Apr 2013 #102
Nice country. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #103
You may dream of moving to NZ- better check to see if NZ even wants you. Sunlei Apr 2013 #113
As Said Upthread - Not Part Of The 1 % - I Am A 99% Corporate Slave - Not Going Anywhere cantbeserious Apr 2013 #114
I'd rather all the blind cheerleaders leave. Fuddnik Apr 2013 #60
Lol no chance. Im happy here. You obviously arent. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #61
you should heed your own advice. bahrbearian Apr 2013 #104
People might be free to leave . . . markpkessinger Apr 2013 #122
GMTA. truebluegreen Apr 2013 #75
"I love and will love my country no matter what." truebluegreen Apr 2013 #74
The poster wasn't embarrassed because of policies. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #76
Yes. And No. truebluegreen Apr 2013 #77
What politicians stand for at times, is not what the same with darkangel218 Apr 2013 #78
Then I guess you have to agree that we don't live in a democracy truebluegreen Apr 2013 #79
Lol. "we dont live in a democracy" , "embarrased to be part of it" darkangel218 Apr 2013 #81
LOL yourself. You make a lot of assumptions truebluegreen Apr 2013 #86
I am not debating democracy, I am debating someones darkangel218 Apr 2013 #88
The word is "disdain." truebluegreen Apr 2013 #100
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Apr 2013 #101
Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #121
Part of the reason policies rarely get changed in any significant way . . . markpkessinger Apr 2013 #123
Good points. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #124
Reply SamKnause Apr 2013 #20
Our goverment is not criminal. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #27
Your Post Leaves "Me Nauseous" - The People Elect The Politicians - We Are Collectively Responsible cantbeserious Apr 2013 #28
Thats not what the other poster said. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #32
Cheerleading For An Empire Led By Corporations And Corrupt Politicians Is Nauseating cantbeserious Apr 2013 #35
Reply 2 SamKnause Apr 2013 #31
Youre going back on your own words! darkangel218 Apr 2013 #36
That response is no more attractive coming from a DUer than it was crim son Apr 2013 #62
I take it youre "dissapointed to be an American" too. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #64
all your talking points... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2013 #82
And your accusations are laughable. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #83
America, love it or leave it... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2013 #85
I dont listen to rw talking points. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #92
+1000. nt awoke_in_2003 Apr 2013 #80
Thanks to that post FiveGoodMen Apr 2013 #125
Love it or Leave it, eh? SammyWinstonJack Apr 2013 #127
That sums it up ... Newest Reality Apr 2013 #25
+1000 forestpath Apr 2013 #57
If you don't believe it can be fixed, you have options. Flatulo Apr 2013 #69
+10000000 darkangel218 Apr 2013 #84
I think that you're all splitting hairs. Beacool Apr 2013 #115
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Apr 2013 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author cantbeserious Apr 2013 #13
Or...as it should be titled, "Obama gives middle finger to Putin" NoodleyAppendage Apr 2013 #16
makes me wonder with the "bellicose posture" & 6-pack tummies we see all over the place these days, Sunlei Apr 2013 #40
How do new tailfins break a pledge not to deploy new weapons? ucrdem Apr 2013 #30
I want our President to be adaptable to our ever changing World. Sunlei Apr 2013 #34
Supporting Weapons Of Mass Destruction Is Something To Be Defended? cantbeserious Apr 2013 #38
no, I'd be happiest if we didn't use anything w/ the danger of radiation accidents. Sunlei Apr 2013 #41
Agree On Questioning Him - He Has Lost My Trust cantbeserious Apr 2013 #42
That's a shame to live with no one you can trust, even a little Sunlei Apr 2013 #46
eom = End Of Message - On Trust, That Is The State Of America Today cantbeserious Apr 2013 #52
So your good with spending billions on WMD's bahrbearian Apr 2013 #53
well lets see, we paid a contractor (a cheney war profit company?) 20 billion to air condition tents Sunlei Apr 2013 #56
Riiiight. UnrepentantLiberal Apr 2013 #66
we did pay billions to air condition tents in Iraq, Bush even sent a billion in USA CASH to Iraq Sunlei Apr 2013 #68
every flip is another notch in his belt Doctor_J Apr 2013 #89
Working overtime to see Republican gains in 2014 I see. Ash_F Apr 2013 #45
They rank high on the list of Democratic candidates who need large campaign donations. UnrepentantLiberal Apr 2013 #67
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #65
So much for that Nobel Peace Prize Cal Carpenter Apr 2013 #72
The only value of nuclear weapons is as a deterrent, since they cannot ever be used. Flatulo Apr 2013 #73
The only thing that makes Obama look good are the #TeaBags broadcaster75201 Apr 2013 #95
That's generally the problem with US elections. ocpagu Apr 2013 #97
Change You Can't Believe In! blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #105
Be reasonable jsr Apr 2013 #106
More like headlines you can't believe in. ucrdem Apr 2013 #107
Billions of dollars in tail-fins. Ash_F Apr 2013 #108
so to hopefully get teabaggers on board with cuts later Doctor_J Apr 2013 #109
Cuts now: "The bigger, strategic versions of the B61 ... would be discontinued." ucrdem Apr 2013 #111
Didn't he gt the Nobel Prize for opposing nuclear weaponry? rug Apr 2013 #112
That will make nukes more useable. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #117
By the USA 's own definitions and laws they are WMDs and hence illegal. dipsydoodle Apr 2013 #118
True, but in war many laws are forgotten. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #119

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
44. Wrong.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:14 AM
Apr 2013

Obama scorecard: Most promises kept

One of the political fact-checking organizations is giving President Obama high marks for promises kept in his first term.

PolitiFact reports that Obama "has fulfilled or made substantial progress on 72% of the 508 promises he made when he ran for president in 2008."

Reports PolitiFact:

"The ongoing project by the Tampa Bay Times' fact-checking website reveals that Obama has achieved 47% of his promises, earning a rating of Promise Kept. Another 25% were partially fulfilled, earning a rating of Compromise.

"Obama fared best in the areas of education and health care. He kept 54% of his education promises and 48% on health care. Most of those were muscled through Congress with the economic stimulus and health care law, which passed when Democrats controlled the House and Senate in the first half of Obama's term. He also kept a promise to end the war in Iraq, an issue that dominated the 2008 campaign.

More:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/01/17/obama-politifact-first-term-promises/1842083/

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
54. He just hasn't kept the promises that are most important to you, and to many of us.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:23 AM
Apr 2013

But over-all, his track record has been one of keeping most promises.

I don't know how it would look if the promises were weighted by importance to his key constituencies.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
55. That's The Point - On The Most Important Issues - He Has Not Delivered On Expected Changes And Action
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:25 AM
Apr 2013

eom

Ian David

(69,059 posts)
63. And some of those aren't his fault. For example, closing Gitmo.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:10 PM
Apr 2013

However, if McCain or Romney had been elected and kept most of THEIR promises, we'd all be utterly fucked.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
87. "The other guy would be worse." "He's not a king."
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 04:22 PM
Apr 2013

Last edited Mon Apr 22, 2013, 10:16 AM - Edit history (1)

The excuses don't fly anymore.


Corporate and bank-cozy appointments, over and over again, including major appointments like: a serial defender of corrupt bankers for the SEC; the architect of "Kill Lists" and supporter of torture, drone wars, and telecom immunity for the CIA; and a Monsanto VP who has lied and been involved in extremely disturbing claims regarding food safety for the FDA. An Attorney General who has not prosecuted a single large bank but wages war against medical marijuana users and *for* strip searches and warrantless surveillance of Americans. And let's not forget Tim Geithner.
Bailouts and settlements for corrupt banks (with personal pressure from Obama to attorneys general to approve them),
Refusal by Obama's DOJ to prosecute even huge, egregious examples of bank fraud (i.e, HSBC)
signing NDAA to allow indefinite detention,
"Kill lists" and claiming of the right to assassinate even American citizens without trial
Expansion of wars into several new countries
A renewed public advocacy for the concept of preemptive war
Drone campaigns in multiple countries with whom we are not at war
Proliferation of military drones in our skies
Federal targeting of Occupy for surveillance and militarized response to peaceful protesters
Fighting all the way to the Supreme Court for warrantless surveillance
Fighting all the way to the Supreme Court for strip searches for any arrestee
Supporting and signing Internet-censoring and privacy-violating measures like ACTA
Support for corporate groping and naked scanning of Americans seeking to travel
A new, massive spy center for warrantless access to Americans' phone calls, emails, and internet use
Support of legislation to legalize massive surveillance of Americans
Militarized police departments, through federal grants
Marijuana users and medical marijuana clinics under assault,
Skyrocketing of the budget for prisons.
Failing to veto a bipartisan vote in Congress to gut more financial regulations.
Passionate speeches and press conferences promoting austerity for Americans
Bush tax cuts extended for billionaires, then much of them made permanent
Support for the payroll tax holiday, tying SS to the general fund
Support for the vicious chained CPI cut in Social Security and benefits for the disabled
Social security, Medicare, and Medicaid offered up as bargaining chips in budget negotiations, with No mention of cutting corporate welfare or the military budget
Advocacy of multiple new free trade agreements, including The Trans-Pacific, otherwise known as "NAFTA on steroids."
Support of drilling, pipelines, and selling off portions of the Gulf of Mexico
Corporate education policy including high stakes corporate testing, charter/privatization and closures of public schools
New policies of targeting children and first responders in drone campaigns,
New policies of awarding medals for remote drone attacks,
Appointment of private prison executives to head the US Marshal's office
Massive escalation of federal contracts for private prisons under US Marshall's office
Legal battle against union rights of hundreds of thousands of federal workers
Billions for nuclear bombs in Europe
Warrantless search and seizure, and suspension of Miranda rights.
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
110. well aren't you a turd in the koolaid bowl
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:36 PM
Apr 2013

He's gone from weak appeaser to enthusiastic accomplice. But gives a great speech after a disaster.

Peregrine Took

(7,413 posts)
70. He has a special talent for shattering the hopes and dreams of his base.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:48 PM
Apr 2013

Yet he runs to us whenever he is scared.



jsr

(7,712 posts)
2. But sensible people agree our MIC is the most important thing in the budget
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:07 AM
Apr 2013

and shall not be touched.

 

anotherone

(8 posts)
128. It's good
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 06:43 PM
Apr 2013

that people are being exposed to this administration's lies, by why has it taken so long for many to realize?

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
6. who is doing the "accusing"?
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:10 AM
Apr 2013

See 3rd paragraph.

"This will be a significant upgrade of the US nuclear capability in Europe," said Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of Nuclear Scientists. "It flies directly in the face of the pledges Obama made in 2010 that he would not deploy new weapons."

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
9. I re-read and didn't get my edit in before your response
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:12 AM
Apr 2013

I still think it's jumping the gun ( no pun intended) to start accusing, when all it says is the Air Force requested the funds. Does that mean it's actually going to be funded?

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
10. Part of a budget in some shape or form I guess.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:17 AM
Apr 2013

The last few paras refer to some kind of associated deal.

SamKnause

(13,101 posts)
7. U.S.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:11 AM
Apr 2013

If this surprises anyone you have not been paying attention.

The U.S. does not and will not abide by any law.

They are not members of the International Court of Law.

The U.S. does not abide by the Geneva Convention.

The U.S. does not hold their politicians or military brass accountable for their actions. (Invasions, occupations, coup attempts, backing coup attempts, financing coup attempts, drone attacks and interference of elections in foreign countries.) The list is endless of the dirty tricks that the U.S. will use to impose their might and force on countries.

The U.S. is a rogue nation that is hell bent on ruling the world by military force.

It is embarrassing to be an American.



Let the flaming begin.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
14. "it is embarrasing to be an American"
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:31 AM
Apr 2013

What stops you from leaving then?

Don't let the door hit you on your way out!!

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
17. Yes i am!
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:37 AM
Apr 2013

I love and will love my country no matter what x

Policies can be changed, and those who care about them should work on that instead of saying they're embarrassed to be Americans.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
18. We Will Have To Agree To Disagree - Our Points Of View Are Wildly Divergent - Enjoy The Cheerleading
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:39 AM
Apr 2013

eom

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
39. Im a cheerleader for my country.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:07 AM
Apr 2013

Politicians are not everyone and everything this amazing country is.


Adios!

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
103. Nice country.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 06:23 PM
Apr 2013

Try Florida, Daytona area. Kind of the same. Besides central FL is mostly blue right now.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
60. I'd rather all the blind cheerleaders leave.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:43 AM
Apr 2013

People who will tolerate anything are the problem.

I was here first. You leave.

markpkessinger

(8,395 posts)
122. People might be free to leave . . .
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 06:02 AM
Apr 2013

. . . but they aren't necessarily free to stay wherever they might go, so it's a rather meaningless point.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
74. "I love and will love my country no matter what."
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 03:02 PM
Apr 2013

My country, Right or Wrong. Love it or Leave it.

Are you sure that's the right way to work for change? Seems to me having the capacity to admit embarrassment at our policies can go a long way toward rectifying past wrongs and preventing future ones.

First we have to admit that we have a problem.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
76. The poster wasn't embarrassed because of policies.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 03:06 PM
Apr 2013

He said he was "embarrassed to be an American'.

I have no.problem with criticizing policies, or politicians. But saying you're embarrassed to be American is pretty out there, don't you think?

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
77. Yes. And No.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 03:19 PM
Apr 2013

If you want to play with semantics you could make a case but I think it is as nonsensical to be embarrassed to be American as it is to be proud of it. Unless you are a naturalized citizen, it is not a choice you made.

But I don't think the poster was trying to say he was embarrassed of his birth, but rather of what America has come to stand for, and being a part of that, however small. I concur.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
79. Then I guess you have to agree that we don't live in a democracy
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 03:46 PM
Apr 2013

since the politicians don't stand for the same things we do.

Another reason to be embarrassed to be a part of it.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
81. Lol. "we dont live in a democracy" , "embarrased to be part of it"
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 03:58 PM
Apr 2013

Then work on.changing it if you don't like it, don't say you're embarrassed that youre a citizen of this country. And like I said before , no one is forcing anyone to stay if they don't like it.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
86. LOL yourself. You make a lot of assumptions
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 04:11 PM
Apr 2013

and take a lot on yourself.

How would you know if I, or anyone else, am working to change it, or not? And who are you to decide what anyone else should, or should not, think or say?

You apparently are not well-acquainted with the ideals this country purports to stand for.

BTW, does it match your definition of a democracy when 80-90% of the people want a law passed, and our democratically-elected representatives won't pass it?

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
88. I am not debating democracy, I am debating someones
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 04:44 PM
Apr 2013

Distaint for their own country. Keep twisting the subject all you want, I have better things to do.

Response to truebluegreen (Reply #100)

Response to darkangel218 (Reply #101)

markpkessinger

(8,395 posts)
123. Part of the reason policies rarely get changed in any significant way . . .
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 06:52 AM
Apr 2013

. . . is that far too many in this country refuse to take the first critical step towards effecting such change: the open and honest admission of our collective errors, hypocrisies and failings and their ramifications. Whenever someone tries to initiate a serious discussion of the ways in which this country is failing to live up to its founding ideals, the "America, love it or leave it" crowd immediately chimes at the top of their lungs with just the kind of boosterism you are engaging in in this thread -- a boosterism borne not of patriotism, but of reflexive nationalism. And with that comes the none-too-subtle implication that those who are engaging in criticism of the country or its policies are somehow less-than-patriotic. Thus do we shield ourselves from having to honestly confront most of our collective demons, even as we continue to thump our collective chest about how wonderful we are. You say that those who care about policies should work on changing them. But in order to do that, one first has to engage the moral conversation, and that is exactly what people who say they are "embarrassed to be Americans" are trying to do.

You say elsewhere in this thread that America is its people, not the government. Well, in a representative democracy such as ours, that distinction really doesn't hold water, and as citizens we really cannot get away with hiding behind that artificial distinction in order to evade taking responsibility for what our country does. But apart from that, I will agree that "America is its people" in the same way I will agree that any other country is "its people." But do you really think we Americans are so existentially different from our fellow human inhabitants of the planet? In a form of government such as ours, the people are MORE, not less, responsible for the actions their elected leaders take on their behalf.

What you might try to understand is that when someone says they are "embarrassed to be an American," generally they are attempting to engage in one of those conversations we as Americans have become all too adept at avoiding. And in most cases, they are motivated by a deep belief in this country's founding ideals, and wish to see the country live up to and uphold those ideals. Indeed they believe that when America fails to live up to those ideals, it ceases to be the America it purports to the world to be.

You really might think about all of this a bit before you so smugly suggest people should leave.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
124. Good points.
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 09:19 AM
Apr 2013

However, as with the current presidency, you think your elected officials not always keep their promise. One can work really hard to get someone elected, and be pointless in the end.
That is why I think, its a huge distinction between our people and our elected officials, although theoretically they're supposed to represent us When I met you I had another reason to smile Another reason to wake up and face the day Another reason to let go of the past and look to the future

But I wasn't good enough for you. I wasn't meek enough. I didn't shut up when you told me to.

Today I'm alone again. A blessing or a curse? A blessing perheps for seeing through your lies. A curse for I am again all alone.

Nevertheless, that's preferable to living in a lie.

All that being said, I marked this day on the calendar. As the day part of my soul died for you.

SamKnause

(13,101 posts)
20. Reply
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:42 AM
Apr 2013

Are you proud of what this country does with your tax dollars and in your name ?

Do you even know the history of this country ?

Do you even care ?

Do you think the U.S. is always exceptional and right in everything they do ?

My father and uncle fought in WW ll, another uncle fought in the Korean War and the Vietnam War, my brother-in-law fought in the Vietnam War.

I am fifth generation.

Just because my government is criminal and corrupt does not mean I do not love my country.

The government is not my country.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
27. Our goverment is not criminal.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:53 AM
Apr 2013

Elected officials can be voted out and replaced!

DO You even know WHO America is? America is the people! Is the land for which your father and grandfather have fought! That's who America is, not its transient government or its policies you disagree with.

Your post made me nauseaus. I have nothing else left to say to you.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
32. Thats not what the other poster said.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:02 AM
Apr 2013

My reply was to him/her. But feel free to be nauseated all you want by my support for my country.

SamKnause

(13,101 posts)
31. Reply 2
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:01 AM
Apr 2013

You have nothing to say to me because you do not have a coherent argument.

I stated very clearly that I love my country and the government is not the country.

My late relatives who fought in many wars would be sickened to see what is happening in this country.

How many elections will it take to end the warmongering ?

Does it end when we have Republican control of the government ? NO !

Does it end when we have Democratic control of the government ? NO !

We do have a criminal government that is above the law.

I am sorry that you can not, or will not see or admit that.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
36. Youre going back on your own words!
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:06 AM
Apr 2013

You said you're embarrased to be an American. Being an American is more than what decisions the government makes. You could've said you're embarrased by said decisions, but you went all in with your hate.

Like I said, I have nothing left to say to you. Have a nice life.

crim son

(27,464 posts)
62. That response is no more attractive coming from a DUer than it was
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:05 PM
Apr 2013

when the FReepers used it during the shrub administration.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
64. I take it youre "dissapointed to be an American" too.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:17 PM
Apr 2013

I would dare you to say that to a Mexican immigrant for example, who is risking his life crossing the border just to be able to live in America.

Maybe is time for you and the others to look around and see how blessed you actually are. Politicians can be replaced. this magickal land and its people can not.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
92. I dont listen to rw talking points.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 04:57 PM
Apr 2013

I agree with love it or leave it. Love it enough to want to and try to change things you don't like. For someone who just gives up and says " I'm embarrassed to be an American" than yah, they might as well leave. Apparently they would be happy somewhere else.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
25. That sums it up ...
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:49 AM
Apr 2013

Though America is just the biggest, baddest boy on the block.

I assume you have been exposed to Chomsky, Zinn, et al? One cannot help but come to the conclusions you are relating here and people who have not taken time to focus on delving more deeply would find your embarrassment to be an affront to their manufactured perceptions and vague notions.

What's behind the curtain is irrefutable, though refuting it is, at least, a start since the mainstream is merely a pervasive and persistent Simulation created by the wizards of public relations and scripted persuasion.

I no longer feel "embarrassed" to be an American only because that is only the initial part of a process whereby you free yourself from identifying with arbitrary, symbolic means of manipulation which include vague notions of boundaries, borders nationalism, etc.

In that sense, this is an entire planet, organic and dynamic with only degrees of difference between land, shore, sea and mountain, all connected with changing, fuzzy lines.

In that sense, we are a species, an entire people, all seven-billion plus of us, who also live within conceptual boundaries that are dynamic, fuzzy, changing and subjective. There being no "actual" lines, somebody is bound to capitalize on creating symbols to give the illusions that bind us by whatever means possible into identifying with what is presented as if it were the absolute and inviolable truth of the Universe itself. Not so, ever!

Those are all the foundations for the results we are experiencing and, once explored carefully, they are seen for what they are, regardless of whether we like the result or find ourselves faced with conceptual dismay or experiencing a range of emotional discomforts as a reaction to discovery.

Thanks for summing it up, but do realize that you are also throwing rocks at the houses of the holy, though once the glass walls are broken much more can be seen outside the cage of belief and the conceptual shell with its imaginary hopes and fears.

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
69. If you don't believe it can be fixed, you have options.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:48 PM
Apr 2013

You can't renounce your citizenship while in the US, but if you go to Canada or Mexico and appear before a US consulate, you may do so.

http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizenship_776.html

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
115. I think that you're all splitting hairs.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 09:50 AM
Apr 2013

You can still love your country and be embarrassed by the actions of its government.

Response to dipsydoodle (Original post)

Response to darkangel218 (Reply #11)

NoodleyAppendage

(4,619 posts)
16. Or...as it should be titled, "Obama gives middle finger to Putin"
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:33 AM
Apr 2013

This move, I highly suspect, is in response to Putin's bellicose posture over a whole host of issues. I think the calculus has been made that only a firm, threatening posture is likely to get Putin's attention...when he's not too distracted gazing at his 6-pack stomach.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
40. makes me wonder with the "bellicose posture" & 6-pack tummies we see all over the place these days,
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:07 AM
Apr 2013

That a lot of this behavior comes out of those newish, highly advertised tubes of testosterone creams.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
30. How do new tailfins break a pledge not to deploy new weapons?
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:00 AM
Apr 2013

According to the article:

Under the plan, nearly 200 B61 gravity bombs stockpiled in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Turkey would be given new tail fins that would turn them into guided weapons that could be delivered by stealth F35 fighter-bombers.


New tailfins are not new warheads, or new weapons, so while I fully agree that our nuclear stockpile should be reduced if not eliminated, it looks like Obama is keeping to the letter and spirit of the 2010 review, and I'm not sure I see what Mr Kristensen is so exercised about.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
34. I want our President to be adaptable to our ever changing World.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:03 AM
Apr 2013

As thrifty as possible too, with Americans federal dollars. If they can upgrade rather than totally scrap/replace some technology, that's probably something he should support.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
41. no, I'd be happiest if we didn't use anything w/ the danger of radiation accidents.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:10 AM
Apr 2013

But I have to have a level of trust in President Obama to do the right thing. Doesn't mean we can't question him of course.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
56. well lets see, we paid a contractor (a cheney war profit company?) 20 billion to air condition tents
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:26 AM
Apr 2013

in the Bush war. By ending that war as President Obama did and working some magic with the budget. Maybe, I hope that 20 billion does go to the needy

 

UnrepentantLiberal

(11,700 posts)
66. Riiiight.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:34 PM
Apr 2013

Is that what the White House spin is today? Can you inform the.president that only the Democratic base is buying this bullshit?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
68. we did pay billions to air condition tents in Iraq, Bush even sent a billion in USA CASH to Iraq
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:46 PM
Apr 2013

and lost track of it. America was so out of control with the squandering of Americans federal money, and the local state funds money grabbers- it's a freaking miracle we manage as well as today.

We have a longgg way to go, but things could be much worse.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
89. every flip is another notch in his belt
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 04:49 PM
Apr 2013

To the sycophants,dinos,and morons. Will soon be regarded as the worst president in history.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
45. Working overtime to see Republican gains in 2014 I see.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 11:14 AM
Apr 2013

I didn't realize a nuclear arsenal was high on the popularity list with Americans. Do nukes rank above no gun background checks, cuts to social security and tax cuts for the rich, or below?

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
73. The only value of nuclear weapons is as a deterrent, since they cannot ever be used.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 12:52 PM
Apr 2013

A more accurate nuclear bomb is a better deterrent than a less accurate one. Either way, the nuclear bomb is still a nuclear bomb.

Unilaterally disarming is not a good idea.

broadcaster75201

(387 posts)
95. The only thing that makes Obama look good are the #TeaBags
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 05:14 PM
Apr 2013

Obama is a Conservative ... pure and simple. What a disaster. But, no, I won't sit home in 2014 (I didn't in 2010 either). The GOP in charge is too horrifying to contemplate.

 

ocpagu

(1,954 posts)
97. That's generally the problem with US elections.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 05:32 PM
Apr 2013

Voters have to decide between a self-declared liberal who's in fact conservative, and a self-declared conservative who's in fact a potential mass murderer who should be locked in a dungeon under the Pentagon...

The left is rarely represented.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
107. More like headlines you can't believe in.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 09:24 PM
Apr 2013

I honestly don't see how adding to tail fins to existing weapons can be considered a U-turn. Also, the article states that a) "The bigger, strategic versions of the B61, stockpiled in the US, would be discontinued," b) that further cuts are planned:

This spring, Obama was expected to make a speech outlining proposals to make further cuts to about 1,100 warheads. But US officials have said the crisis over North Korea and the time needed to install a second-term national security team have delayed the speech.


and c) that the tail fins are basically useless pork:

Joseph Cirincione, the president of the Ploughshares Fund, an arms control pressure group, said the B61 modernisation plans were largely driven by domestic political considerations . . . "I'm convinced the president wants to the continue his efforts to reform US nuclear policy," Cirincione said. "But the administration had a schizoid approach on this issue. They believe they have to buy off legislators with billions of dollars in expenditure in their states in order to get votes for arms control measures later."


So not maybe such a U-turn after all.
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
109. so to hopefully get teabaggers on board with cuts later
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:30 PM
Apr 2013

Extraordinarily dumb, or complicit? You decide.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
111. Cuts now: "The bigger, strategic versions of the B61 ... would be discontinued."
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:53 PM
Apr 2013

There's plenty to criticize but at least let's get the story right and not fall for every misleading headline.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
117. That will make nukes more useable.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:12 PM
Apr 2013

So now we will have a nuclear bomb that will have military GPS accuracy to within a couple of feet of the target point.

One of the reasons that nukes haven't been used since WWII is that they cause huge collateral damage. They can only be used in total war. Their use in limited conventional war creates the risk (guarantee) of escalation. The B-61 can be set for various sized yields, from 340KT to a mere .3KT. That minimum setting is about the same size as the recent blast in West, TX. When combined with a bunker-buster casing that could become tempting to use it to get at a targeted underground facility.

This is a dangerous improvement in our capability.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
119. True, but in war many laws are forgotten.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:26 PM
Apr 2013

The hotter the war, the more laws get forgotten. We have already stated that if an enemy uses poison gas we will consider that the same as a nuke and respond with nukes.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama accused of nuclear ...