Judge: Iowa State U. must shield 'pink slime' data
Source: AP
A judge has blocked Iowa State University from releasing documents about food safety research conducted for the maker of the beef product that critics call "pink slime."
District Judge Dale Ruigh ruled last month that releasing the information would cause "irreparable harm" to Sioux Falls, SD-based Beef Products, Inc., by revealing information about proprietary food-processing techniques.
BPI filed legal action seeking to block the release in 2010 after the records were requested by a Seattle law firm specializing in food safety. The New York Times later sought the documents.
The research was conducted by professor James Dickson, who was hired by BPI as a consultant in 2002. Dickson says his research has found that a process in which ammonia is applied to meat makes the product safer by killing bacteria.
Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/10/pink-slime-food-safety/2070441/
This is the full article; the article may expand later. Wonder why it's only being reported TODAY a ruling from LAST MONTH?
Judge Ruigh was appointed in 1981 by Republican governor Robert D. Ray.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)If an objective, peer-reviewed truth would result in an industry's demise, then maybe that industry shouldn't exist in the first place.
Regardless, Upton Sinclair is rolling over in his grace at this ruling.
christx30
(6,241 posts)for this business I'm working on. Going to market broken glass in a plastic bag to kids 2 and up. Why? Well, you 're forbidden to ask that question or release any information you have on it.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Warpy
(111,389 posts)and I sincerely hope it will be overturned. I don't care what the University turned up, whether pink slime treated with ammonia increases the human life span or is the nasty adulterant its name suggests, peer reviewed science needs to be published. Period.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I can't argue with any bit of your position. And here we are... money, in addition to politics and social values, now trumps science too.
Fundamentally absurd.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)And doesn't Iowa have a version of the Freedom of Information Act? Most states do.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Thanks for saving me the effort of reading the study.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)kcass1954
(1,819 posts)underpants
(182,957 posts)perish the thought
Moostache
(9,897 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)dam that stuff is really good eat'n
Tempest
(14,591 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)another example of corporate greed, and corporations escaping accountability.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Mr.Pain
(52 posts)I just did some web surfing and found a description of pink slime by the actual manufacturer, Beef Products Inc. They describe it as scraps that have been processed in a centrifuge and have been blasted with ammonia gas. I live in farm country where they spray ammonia for fertilizer on the fields, (this increases the PH levels and also helps create Nitrates in the soil). A high PH means that it is alkaline, which breaks down organic materials. I think I can see why its a "slime", in any case don't eat it. It cant be good for you, if its good for "Food Inc".
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)piles of rotting cow heads,tails,guts full of manure, legs and hoof, animals that died in the trailers, the vats of blood below the slaughterhouse floors, chunks of belly fat, cow fetuses,maggots, sad cowless utters dripping with milk..blow in a bunch of hydrogen, mix in some quicklime and the manure gives off as it (reacts with the crap bacteria) ammonia. strain out the solids... mmm pink slime. 100% beef
Javaman
(62,534 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)They don't want us to know how little meat is in our meat.
Blandocyte
(1,231 posts)and the company would lose money. Sure.