Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 06:54 PM Mar 2013

(Gov.) Beshear vetoes Kentucky religious freedom bill

Source: Lexington Herald-Leader

Gov. Steve Beshear vetoed a controversial religious-freedom bill Friday afternoon, saying the measure was well intended but would spark costly taxpayer-funded court cases and bring an array of unintended consequences.

"I have significant concerns that this bill will cause serious unintentional consequences that could threaten public safety, health care and individuals' civil rights," Beshear said in a statement. "As written, the bill will undoubtedly lead to costly litigation."

House Bill 279 would allow someone with "sincerely held" religious beliefs to disregard state laws "unless the government proves by clear and convincing evidence that it has a compelling governmental interest in infringing" the person's religious freedom. Gay rights and human rights groups have said the bill could be used to challenge local anti-discrimination laws that protect gays and lesbians in Lexington, Louisville, Covington and Vicco.

The sponsor of House Bill 279, Rep. Bob Damron, D-Nicholasville, said he thinks he'll have the 51 votes required to override the veto if House leaders decide to take a vote. Damron said Beshear, a Democrat, did not ask him or Democratic House leaders to refrain from trying to override the bill during a conversation of more than an hour Friday in the governor's Capitol office.

Read more: http://www.kentucky.com/2013/03/22/2569508/beshear-will-veto-religious-freedom.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

alp227

(32,026 posts)
4. Even worse a DEMOCRAT sponsored this bill.
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 09:02 PM
Mar 2013

So I guess that is why I saw this story earlier suggesting that KY Dems don't want Ashley Judd to run for the US Senate?

Furthermore, Beshear (also allegedly a Democrat) 2.5 years ago gave away state taxpayer money to acreationist theme park.

madville

(7,410 posts)
14. There is a ton of nuttery in that state's politics
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 07:56 AM
Mar 2013

I think she would be a good voice in federal politics, using Kentucky as a spring board may not be possible though especially with her previous campaign and fundraising support for President Obama, he's not popular there at all, only got 39% in the 2012 election while Romney got 57%.

mwb970

(11,360 posts)
13. Is there a difference between these people and the Taliban, aside from which religion they defile?
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 07:54 AM
Mar 2013

Because I'm not seeing it.

reACTIONary

(5,770 posts)
15. Major difference. The Taliban...
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 09:37 AM
Mar 2013

...don't pretend to support religious freedom or any sort of freedom at all. These people are hypocrites by comparison.

LonePirate

(13,424 posts)
3. WTF? Ds hold the KY House 59-41 and this bill only received 7 "No" votes
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 08:01 PM
Mar 2013

Sounds like the KY House had 93 Rs and 7 Ds.

 

Generation_Why

(97 posts)
9. Most Democrats here in KY are registered that way because of tradition only.
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 04:31 AM
Mar 2013

Started when Lincoln pissed off Kentuckians by making them pay fees for the Reconstruction.

They registered as Democrat out of protest, but continue to vote Republican.

Continues to this day.

neoclown

(7 posts)
5. I think it's a great idea
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 09:03 PM
Mar 2013

0% loans for all. God says so.

Exodus 22:25 ESV

“If you lend money to any of my people with you who is poor, you shall not be like a moneylender to him, and you shall not exact interest from him.

Leviticus 25:37 ESV

You shall not lend him your money at interest, nor give him your food for profit.

 

uselessobot

(43 posts)
11. This scares the crap out of the banksters too
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 06:41 AM
Mar 2013

caught a discussion on this the other day I think it was Hal Sparks talking about how Islamic and some Hebrew Banks don't not charge interest on a business loan but take a percentage of the profit instead. Islamic Banks are looking to open shop in America and it will disrupt the American way of lending money and the PTB in America do not like it.

Most business take a few years to really make a profit and paying your monthly nut to the banksters can send a new business into bankruptcy rather quickly. If a business was given time to get going and you did not have to pay back the loan until you make a profit it would cause small business to flourish in America, something the PTB do not want.

A Little Weird

(1,754 posts)
6. It might get overturned
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 10:53 PM
Mar 2013

I'm surprised (but pleased!) that Beshear vetoed the bill. I think he got too much negative feedback on it to ignore (he posted a 59 page pdf of letters from various concerned organizations). But there is already talk by representative Damron (D) of overturning his veto. There's a good chance they will be able to do it.

Sadly, most of the democrats in office in Kentucky would be indistinguishable from republicans in other places - there are very few true progressive voices here. Most of the republicans here are just f'ing crazy.

 

RiverNoord

(1,150 posts)
7. Wow - where do the adults hang out
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 11:26 PM
Mar 2013

in Kentucky? Obviously not in the legislature. This is genuinely the most F'd up concept of a law that actually passed an American legislative body that I've encountered during my lifetime. Seriously? How on earth could you possibly judicially determine whether a religious belief is 'sincerely held?' And - oh, screw it, what's the point?

Turbineguy

(37,337 posts)
8. "..costly taxpayer-funded court cases and bring an array of unintended consequences.."
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 04:13 AM
Mar 2013

No problem. Just give everybody a tax cut.

mwb970

(11,360 posts)
12. So laws don't apply to religious people.
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 07:42 AM
Mar 2013

I've always suspected that they believe this, but this is the first time I've heard of an attempt to make the idea that religious people are above the law into a law.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
16. This bill is just completely wrong!
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 05:02 PM
Mar 2013

I hope the veto is upheld somehow. Democrats in the legislature need to start acting like democrats.

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
17. This could be entertaining...
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 10:16 PM
Mar 2013

Declare you are a member of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church and that your sincerely held religious beliefs require you to smoke ganga at least three times a day, so you are disregarding the state laws against the possession and use of cannabis.

If that shit flies, watch one of two things happen:

Thing 1: There will be a fistfight in the bowels of the Kentucky Legislature building to see who gets to be primary sponsor of the bill repealing House Bill 279.

or...

Thing 2: Ethiopian Zion Copticism will become the most popular religion in the Commonwealth of Kentucky by this time tomorrow.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
18. LOL
Sun Mar 24, 2013, 06:49 PM
Mar 2013

You know what's really funny? Those religious people in America who think their religion tells them to hate and discriminate against others - and then think the govt should sanction this.

What a bunch of assholes.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(Gov.) Beshear vetoes Ken...