Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 10:30 PM Mar 2013

Ed Schultz Leaving MSNBC Weeknights, Moving To Weekends

Source: huffingtonpost.com

MSNBC's Ed Schultz announced on his Wednesday show that he would be leaving his 8 p.m. weeknight time slot. Schultz will move "The Ed Show" to the weekends, where it will air from 5 to 7 PM on Saturdays and Sundays. Thursday night's show will be his last. His weekend show will begin in April.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/13/ed-schultz-time-slot-leaving-weeknight_n_2871383.html?utm_hp_ref=media



***VIDEO AT LINK***
107 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ed Schultz Leaving MSNBC Weeknights, Moving To Weekends (Original Post) Grassy Knoll Mar 2013 OP
That was shocking news! SCVDem Mar 2013 #1
Someone tweeted me amuse bouche Mar 2013 #6
For years MSNBC has been showing "Lock Up" (prisons) on weekends - hour after hour after hour. Cal33 Mar 2013 #64
If you look at it like that SCVDem Mar 2013 #78
Perhaps his move is a beginning to more interesting mzmolly Mar 2013 #89
Now, that is something that never even crossed my mind. It would be okay by me, if Cal33 Mar 2013 #94
I love politics. I meant in lieu of "Lockup" or "Lockdown" or "Locked Away" ... mzmolly Mar 2013 #106
Could This Guy Be Coming Back? Yavin4 Mar 2013 #2
He did just settle his lawsuit against Current TV. drm604 Mar 2013 #4
I doubt it. I will eat my words if he does. It just doesn't seem likely. n/t Cleita Mar 2013 #5
I think that bridge has been burned -- so I doubt it, too. gateley Mar 2013 #28
No. He's burned his bridges. AngryOldDem Mar 2013 #47
I heard recently he was going to be doing a sports gig. LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #60
Nope. Beacool Mar 2013 #99
Oh, hell! There goes my "Caught on Camera" viewing! nt morningglory Mar 2013 #3
You win 1983law Mar 2013 #16
While I would love to have Olbermann back Warpy Mar 2013 #7
Weekend gig on MSNBC = 'kicking to the curb". Just saying. eom Purveyor Mar 2013 #8
Ed was wished away to the cornfield... NOVA_Dem Mar 2013 #10
You know his wife has cancer, right? Not everything's a conspiracy, and Cenk didn't fit.... Tarheel_Dem Mar 2013 #35
+ Champion Jack Mar 2013 #57
Not everyone is in the tank for Obama, and not everyone is an Obama hater! Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #68
True. When I listened to Ed's radio show years ago, he was pretty LibDemAlways Mar 2013 #22
Ed Schultz is an exceptionally honest man when it comes to politics. JDPriestly Mar 2013 #23
From what I heard from him, he is a lugheaded buffoon. imo eom Purveyor Mar 2013 #26
What, exactly, did you hear that made you think this? whathehell Mar 2013 #45
Not really. They need more shows like this on the weekends. It is always Alex Whitt and Lock-up. wisteria Mar 2013 #24
Take a look at this Samantha Mar 2013 #9
Ezra Klein leaves me cold bucolic_frolic Mar 2013 #11
He is super intelligent Samantha Mar 2013 #15
I'd rather see Joy Reid n/t PADemD Mar 2013 #59
She is pretty sharp Samantha Mar 2013 #105
Sharpton is a little off on his delivery also Life Long Dem Mar 2013 #104
Me too. Even though I totally agree with everything he says. SunSeeker Mar 2013 #17
I love Ezra Klein vlyons Mar 2013 #33
Me too. JohnnyRingo Mar 2013 #42
Very true. He really knows the budget issues. He appears to be Rachel's go-to guy on that. nt SunSeeker Mar 2013 #76
I love Ezra too. malibea Mar 2013 #103
not just you. IcyPeas Mar 2013 #19
When did MSNBC start worrying about muddying their identity ? russspeakeasy Mar 2013 #12
Since they found out they were getting fewer cable dollars than Fox or CNN???? Samantha Mar 2013 #14
Nailed it ! russspeakeasy Mar 2013 #77
Not a fan of Ezra Klein but his wife is terrific aint_no_life_nowhere Mar 2013 #32
Always thought Ezra was next. Good. I like brainy. nt onehandle Mar 2013 #37
That doesn't make any sense. Ed has the second highest rating, only behind Rachel Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #69
It doesn't make any sense to me either unless you follow the money Samantha Mar 2013 #75
Goodie, getting rid of some of going to prison. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #13
I'm looking forward to it. truthisfreedom Mar 2013 #18
I agree with you. n/t wisteria Mar 2013 #25
How about moving Alex Wagner up to prime time Nancy Waterman Mar 2013 #20
Spitzer would be my first choice (although I AM an Ezra fan) -- someone else suggested gateley Mar 2013 #29
Spitzer for me too, please. Myrina Mar 2013 #61
+1000... kjackson227 Mar 2013 #65
Hope he stays on daytime radio paria_wave Mar 2013 #21
He said he was going to keep doing his radio show. And welcome to DU! gateley Mar 2013 #31
I bet this has more to do with his wife's health situation than anything else. WCGreen Mar 2013 #27
I thought that as well...Doing a radio show plus a five night a week TV show whathehell Mar 2013 #46
I think this may be due to his wife's battle with cancer, sad to say, I love the man. :-( secondwind Mar 2013 #30
Good move, in my opinion... Hulk Mar 2013 #34
I listen to Randi via iheart.com (KTLK) streaming audio. Like you, I'm listening to more NPR... Tarheel_Dem Mar 2013 #38
Randi Rhodes is the BEST. She just is. Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #70
LOVE! HER! She's the only progressive radio host I'm listening to these days. Tarheel_Dem Mar 2013 #80
I know. I'm losing interest in Stephanie Miller. I like her and the show, but for some reason, it's Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #83
I catch Steph occassionally on Wednesday. Hal is the smartest guy in the room. If Steph wouldn't.. Tarheel_Dem Mar 2013 #85
Yeah, that's it! I wondered why I was getting disinterested. Most of her show is reactive. She and Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #86
"I'm just losing interest in the format." I've been there for quite some time now. Tarheel_Dem Mar 2013 #91
I love "Rightwing World" and love Jim Ward's voice impersonations Larkspur Mar 2013 #101
TY TY TY TY THANK YOU!!! Hulk Mar 2013 #90
You're welcome, but the trend is happening across the country. TPTB have determined that..... Tarheel_Dem Mar 2013 #92
You can stream Thom Hartmann at Free Speech TV or Cleita Mar 2013 #39
I agree with you about Ed. OnyxCollie Mar 2013 #40
At least that means less Prison Reality television on MSNBC TomCADem Mar 2013 #36
Really going to miss Ed on the week nights brightertomorrow Mar 2013 #41
I'm bummed, started listening to Big Ed on the radio Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #43
Good Sky Masterson Mar 2013 #44
He "annoys" you? Oh well then.. whathehell Mar 2013 #48
Never asked anyone to care. Sky Masterson Mar 2013 #54
LOL! whathehell Mar 2013 #87
I didn't say that. Sky Masterson Mar 2013 #88
Um, yes you did. whathehell Mar 2013 #93
I so want to tell you to fu_k off. Sky Masterson Mar 2013 #96
I so want to tell you how st*pid you seem whathehell Mar 2013 #97
Is that supposed to hurt me in some way Sky Masterson Mar 2013 #98
No, although if you're concerned whathehell Mar 2013 #100
do you read what you write before you hit post ? olddots Mar 2013 #107
I want Martin!!! nt kelliekat44 Mar 2013 #49
I DVR Martin. SCVDem Mar 2013 #50
Ed lost me the night of the first debate. Watching him, thought I was watching Fox graham4anything Mar 2013 #51
Sounds like you did want Fox News ... earthside Mar 2013 #62
I disagree with you. Chris and Ed were awful after the first debate. Only Rachel and Al reported Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #71
President Obama roped the dopes, Mitt gave it all he got, as proved had nothing but flailing graham4anything Mar 2013 #74
Lol in what universe? SpartanDem Mar 2013 #79
the Rope-a-dope works every time. President Obama knocked Mitt out 3 times. graham4anything Mar 2013 #82
I absolutely agree with you on that ... earthside Mar 2013 #84
Al Sharpton was a STAND-OUT in his election commentary Samantha Mar 2013 #63
He did a great job that night and did not become emotional or unprofessional. Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #72
Only Obama-bots would think that Obama did great on debate #1 Larkspur Mar 2013 #102
Good. maybe they put something on at 8 that is watchable. underpants Mar 2013 #52
Nightmare scenario Ghost of Tom Joad Mar 2013 #53
TPTB have spoken bucolic_frolic Mar 2013 #55
I think Ed's schedule has left him with zero spare time AndyA Mar 2013 #56
Thank You mtasselin Mar 2013 #58
At least he'll still have his radio show. I enjoy listening to Ed everyday. Sad to see him leave the Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #66
his radio show is better madrchsod Mar 2013 #67
I agree. There's not a day that goes by where I don't listen to his radio show. Luckily I have the Liberal_Stalwart71 Mar 2013 #73
I will be taping his show every day. I have been watching him exclusively lately. Sorry to see him jwirr Mar 2013 #81
It's fine either way for me. agentS Mar 2013 #95
 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
1. That was shocking news!
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 10:34 PM
Mar 2013

5 PDT. Now what?

Current is good but will go away.

I don't suppose they are bringing Keith back, I wish, I wish, I wish!

amuse bouche

(3,657 posts)
6. Someone tweeted me
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 10:49 PM
Mar 2013

that Keith would be doing a sports show on MSNBC. I asked for a link and will check to see if he sent one

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
64. For years MSNBC has been showing "Lock Up" (prisons) on weekends - hour after hour after hour.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:46 AM
Mar 2013

I found the program very depressing. I, for one, will be glad to have Ed
Schultz on Saturdays and Sundays for a change. MSNBC finally decided
to make this change about having a news program on weekends, too. I
hope Ed will stay there for a long time to come, and may he have many
more viewers, too.

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
78. If you look at it like that
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 11:04 AM
Mar 2013

we only lose one hour of Ed a week.

I never watch prisons but found it amusing when Rachel sent us there for so long!

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
94. Now, that is something that never even crossed my mind. It would be okay by me, if
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:30 PM
Mar 2013

he should decide to spend a little more time on non-political issues.

mzmolly

(50,993 posts)
106. I love politics. I meant in lieu of "Lockup" or "Lockdown" or "Locked Away" ...
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 12:13 PM
Mar 2013
But I too enjoy Ed. I am sorry if this is a demotion of sorts.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
47. No. He's burned his bridges.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 05:32 AM
Mar 2013

Last I read he was hinting about coming back to ESPN, where the bridges are pretty well torched, too.

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
7. While I would love to have Olbermann back
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 10:55 PM
Mar 2013

it seems likely he'll be back only to his first love, sports.

NOVA_Dem

(620 posts)
10. Ed was wished away to the cornfield...
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 11:18 PM
Mar 2013

They did the same thing to Cenk Uygur. They offered Cenk a demotion to regular commentator once he began questioning the Obama administration.

Ed wasn't as critical as Cenk but regularly talked about Obama potentially cutting "The Big 3" and Obama's execution of US citizens by drones overseas without charges or a trial. My guess is that people in admin didn't like that kind of talk.

He'll probably get replaced by another yes man like Sharpton.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)
35. You know his wife has cancer, right? Not everything's a conspiracy, and Cenk didn't fit....
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 01:16 AM
Mar 2013

at MSNBC. Actual "Democrats" watch MSNBC.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
22. True. When I listened to Ed's radio show years ago, he was pretty
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 12:16 AM
Mar 2013

centrist. He's apparently moved too far to the left for the suits' taste. Lately he's been taking no prisoners. This was bound to happen.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
45. What, exactly, did you hear that made you think this?
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 05:18 AM
Mar 2013

I've got news for you...He's the ONLY one on the MSNBC

lineup who speaks up consistently for unions and workers rights

Is he not "Ivy league" enough for you?

 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
24. Not really. They need more shows like this on the weekends. It is always Alex Whitt and Lock-up.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 12:26 AM
Mar 2013

I think it is a good idea though I will miss his show during the week.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
9. Take a look at this
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 11:15 PM
Mar 2013

"Several MSNBC employees, who spoke about programming plans on the condition of anonymity, said the most likely candidate for a new show was the Washington Post columnist Ezra Klein, a frequent substitute for Ms. Maddow. Mr. Klein may start with a weekend time slot, but these people said the 8 p.m. weekday time slot held by Mr. Schultz was also a possibility."

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/12/business/media/msnbc-its-ratings-rising-gains-ground-on-fox-news.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0%22

This article connects a lot of the dots. It mentions MSNBC's wanting to get away from the prison shows because they muddy its identify.

It also addresses the rumor we heard some time ago about Ed's leaving the 8:00 time slot.

But must of all, it addresses what we should have guessed all along: IT IS ALL ABOUT THE RATINGS! Building better ratings means more money and right now they get less cable money than Fox or CNN.

Sam

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
15. He is super intelligent
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 11:35 PM
Mar 2013

Just a little dry in the delivery. He is different. I just can't second-guess who they think will drive up their ratings so they get more money. Who do you think?

Sam

 

Life Long Dem

(8,582 posts)
104. Sharpton is a little off on his delivery also
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 04:42 PM
Mar 2013

Sharpton can get away with it. The new guy might not be able to get past his bad delivery. Number one reason. He's not Al Sharpton. He's just the new guy.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
17. Me too. Even though I totally agree with everything he says.
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 11:42 PM
Mar 2013

I guess it's because he reminds me of my annoying lab partner in high school. That little know-it-all had the same weird cotton-mouth lisp, but he was not progressive.

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
33. I love Ezra Klein
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 01:10 AM
Mar 2013

I like his wonkiness. Very sharp and he follows the money and sniffs out the GOP budget lies.

JohnnyRingo

(18,635 posts)
42. Me too.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 03:35 AM
Mar 2013

Ezra Klein is smart tv.

On edit:
I too believe he's slated for the next spot on MSNBC. All you have to do is see who fills in for the hot time slots. He's Rachel's #1 sub.

malibea

(179 posts)
103. I love Ezra too.
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 04:20 PM
Mar 2013

I love the wonkiness of Ezra as well. And I think he is so cute- but I'm almost 70 years old so I am allowed! I also love Ezra because he is so sharp and witty especially when it comes to discussing economics.

I would also love to see Joy Reid with her own show. I did some research and discovered that Joy is not a newcomer to the political scene and has background and well planted roots in the Florida "political" soil where she has been a "political" person for a long time. She is also well educated which is a privilege and pleasure to see among more females nowadays. She is also a good speaker and can discuss any political element that is covered.

It would be nice if both Ezra and Joy could each have a show. That's not asking for too much and not too much out of the realm of possibilities.

russspeakeasy

(6,539 posts)
12. When did MSNBC start worrying about muddying their identity ?
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 11:22 PM
Mar 2013

30% of the time repubs are on air reading their talking points.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
14. Since they found out they were getting fewer cable dollars than Fox or CNN????
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 11:33 PM
Mar 2013

It is always about the money, right?

Sam

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
32. Not a fan of Ezra Klein but his wife is terrific
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 01:00 AM
Mar 2013

New York Times reporter and Harvard grad Annie Lowrey has been on Rachel Maddow's show and is very well spoken.



 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
69. That doesn't make any sense. Ed has the second highest rating, only behind Rachel
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:03 AM
Mar 2013

While I often became frustrated with Ed, not because of his stances, but because he is sometimes misinformed, we needed his firebrand-type commentary. We need more of than on the political left. Our commentators are too nice. Too milquetoast. I like Rachel, but her giggly demeanor is off-putting at times. We need to get more angry on the left. We're too nice!

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
75. It doesn't make any sense to me either unless you follow the money
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:26 AM
Mar 2013

Once again, Liberal_Stalwart71, he did not attract the targeted age group. MSNBC is getting less money from cable, behind FOX and even CNN (which is disgusting). As business-people, they want those ratings higher and cable advertising money will flow in. They actually want to catch up with Fox's numbers, and they do not see Ed as someone who can do that. (Just for the record, I never miss him. He is different, but that different flare makes him a standout on MSNBC.) So if Ed has to be moved into another time slot in order for them to catch FOX's numbers, so be it, nothing personal, just business.

As I said in another post, thinking like this will drive cable subscribers to other sources which have better content and cost less. They better start looking at the bigger picture. Sure, advertisers' preferences are important, but it is meaningless if cable subscribers drop out of the equation.

I am paying for information and entertainment that I like, but I am not going to pay for content targeted to an age group which is impervious to the quality of the content. That is my prerogative as a consumer.

So I am in agreement with you, we need Ed to be seen in prime time, but who cares what we think?

Sam

truthisfreedom

(23,148 posts)
18. I'm looking forward to it.
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 11:43 PM
Mar 2013

I miss my political shows on MSNBC weekends. The weekend shows they have on are unbecoming of MSNBC.

Nancy Waterman

(6,407 posts)
20. How about moving Alex Wagner up to prime time
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 12:14 AM
Mar 2013

She is terrific. Ezra is smart but very hard to listen to, especially for a whole show. When he covers for Rachel, I last 10 minutes.
Or what about Elliot Spitzer.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
29. Spitzer would be my first choice (although I AM an Ezra fan) -- someone else suggested
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 12:44 AM
Mar 2013

John Fugelsang, but not sure how good of a fit he'd be. LOVE him, though!

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
61. Spitzer for me too, please.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:16 AM
Mar 2013

His show on Current was EXCELLENT. Skewered both parties and the 1% appropriately, didn't rehash snips and clips that had already been covered by other talking heads (seems like Rachel, Ed and Lawrence re-chew what Matthews, Rev Al, etc already said that day) ... and he's wicked brilliant.

kjackson227

(2,166 posts)
65. +1000...
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:52 AM
Mar 2013

Giving Eliot Spitzer a show on MSNBC has been my dream for A VERY LONG TIME! I also hope he'll make a run back to politics.

paria_wave

(6 posts)
21. Hope he stays on daytime radio
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 12:16 AM
Mar 2013

I like to catch Ed on Sirius XM. And I hate prison - like RM - so Sats ain't bad.

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
27. I bet this has more to do with his wife's health situation than anything else.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 12:33 AM
Mar 2013

I believe he can do his radio show from home.

Perhaps he just wants to spend more time with his family.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
46. I thought that as well...Doing a radio show plus a five night a week TV show
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 05:22 AM
Mar 2013

sounds punishing to me.

I'm glad that he's keeping his radio show AND that he's

staying with MSNBC on the weekends.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
34. Good move, in my opinion...
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 01:14 AM
Mar 2013

I really don't care much for Ed's show or his radio. He's too much like Rush Limpballs of the right. Now, don't jump me on that, but his voice, stature, and he can get pretty rude with dim-witted reich wing callers - which leaves me cold.
WHERE is THOM HARTMANN? Damn, I miss that guy. We used to have progressive radio in Portland, Oregon - but no more. The bastards quit progressive radio and went to ANOTHER sports program format - just what we needed. I'm sure somebody listens to that crap, but we already have at LEAST one major sports channel; and we have waaaay too many reich wing stations. We get it all.
Back to Ed. I wish him well. I'm glad he's going to give us a break from "Lock-Up" on the weekends. How lame is that? What they hell are they thinking at MSNBC?? Do they really believe anyone cares to watch that crap??
Back to Ed. He probably means well, but he comes off just too aggressive and rude at times for my taste.
With the lack of progressive radio in our metro area, I'm listening more and more, and enjoying more and more, NPR. You can actually learn something about life and also get a rather "unbiased" review of politics. I sure miss Randi Rhodes though..and Thom Hartmann, and Mike The-Cuss-Word-Guy. His name escapes me as I'm typing. ...oh, Malloy.
Good luck to you Ed. I'll see you on the weekends, and maybe I'll enjoy you even more than I do now.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)
38. I listen to Randi via iheart.com (KTLK) streaming audio. Like you, I'm listening to more NPR...
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 01:46 AM
Mar 2013

but I still switch over to Randi at 3.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
83. I know. I'm losing interest in Stephanie Miller. I like her and the show, but for some reason, it's
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 12:04 PM
Mar 2013

become too playful.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)
85. I catch Steph occassionally on Wednesday. Hal is the smartest guy in the room. If Steph wouldn't..
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 01:57 PM
Mar 2013

try to work in a joke every other second, it could be quite a meaningful show. Sadly, so much of progressive media depends on rightwing media to sustain their shows. It's like they all have the same producer. It's almost like if you watch one show on MSNBC, you can guess what the rest of the lineup will be doing that day. I don't watch Rachel very often, but when I do, she seems to be the only one who puts work & research into her hour. She doesn't rely on endless video & soundbites from rightwing talk radio and Faux News, and the same goes for Melissa.

I also wish MSNBC would do more international news stories, along the lines of Fareed Zakaria. Fareed does the politics thing from time to time, but he often goes outside the DC media bubble, which makes for must see teevee on Sunday morning. I guess the networks are giving the people what they want, but dammit there's a whole big world out there that doesn't revolve around which party scored this week.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
86. Yeah, that's it! I wondered why I was getting disinterested. Most of her show is reactive. She and
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 02:20 PM
Mar 2013

cohorts spend most of the time responding to wingnut attacks. There's really no analysis or information that we don't already know. Now, granted, I totally understand that the primary purpose of her show is to entertain. I get that. I'm just losing interest in the format.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)
91. "I'm just losing interest in the format." I've been there for quite some time now.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 04:02 PM
Mar 2013

Steph has a daily segment dedicated to highlighting rightwingers, I think it's called "Rightwing World" or some such nonsense. I understand it's a cheap way to produce a 3 hour show, but Gawd it's boring. And most shows on MSNBC are just talk radio on the teevee. Even Lawrence, whom I agree with most of the time, has a nightly Rush Limbaugh and/or Bill O'Reilly segment. I've been wondering lately if they actually have a side deal to promote these idiot blowhards? This is not just about seeing what the "other side" is doing, it's more than that. I honestly believe that progressive media sees their fate as tied to that of the Limbaughs/Hannitys and O'Reillys, and that's just sad.

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
101. I love "Rightwing World" and love Jim Ward's voice impersonations
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 03:41 PM
Mar 2013

He nailed Joe Lieberman's voice.

I listen to Bill Press, Stephanine Miller, Sam Seder on The Majority Report, Ed Schultz, Thom Hartmann, Cenk on The Young Turks and on Saturdays The Ring of Fire. I podcast them all.

Stephanie's show helps me laugh at the Reich wing nuts because laughter really unnerves them.

I'm not a fan of Ezra Klein as a TV Show host. His delivery is stiff. I like him as a policy wonk, but find it hard to listen to him for an hour show.

I think Chris Hayes is moving to the 8PM slot. I love Chris Hayes. He comes across as a warm human being who is also very smart. I can listen to him with ease. I always tuned in to his weekend show.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
90. TY TY TY TY THANK YOU!!!
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 04:00 PM
Mar 2013

I can hear that sweet voice again....thank you so much!! I miss that young lady so much.

Funny, cause when I first started listening to her, I couldn't stand her voice. She has that "New York Jewish female voice" that is just normally a completely annoying turn-off to me. And yes, she is Jewish, and maybe she is from New York - but I absolutely LOVE the wisdom and patience that come out of her mouth. The woman is a gift!

I will be listening again. I just can't believe we dumped KPOJ in Portland for a fookin' sports channel. How sad is that!

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)
92. You're welcome, but the trend is happening across the country. TPTB have determined that.....
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 04:05 PM
Mar 2013

progressive radio is a threat, and they're shutting 'em down nationwide, like anybody needs another sports radio station. Enjoy Randi.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
39. You can stream Thom Hartmann at Free Speech TV or
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 02:02 AM
Mar 2013
https://www.freespeech.org/ or if you get the channel you can watch.

He's on between noon and 3:00 pm PT. I do it every day because our only progressive station got changed to an all right wing
news station format like yours did for sports.
 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
40. I agree with you about Ed.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 02:05 AM
Mar 2013

I find his huntin' & fishin' schtick to be be annoying, and I can't stand to listen to a show that talks about "the Righties" and "the Lefties."

I do listen to Mike Malloy all the time, though. He's as bitter and cynical as I am, and listening to his show gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling (although that may be alcohol-related.)

However, if I want news I watch/listen to DemocracyNow! over and over again.

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
36. At least that means less Prison Reality television on MSNBC
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 01:27 AM
Mar 2013

I do wish there were more liberal cable news on Sunday mornings, rather than the corporate media giving lap dances to the GOP on other networks.

brightertomorrow

(122 posts)
41. Really going to miss Ed on the week nights
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 02:13 AM
Mar 2013

I am still in shock at his announcement and not at all happy about it either. I wonder if maybe tomorrow night during his last show he will announce who is taking over his hour?? Sure wish it would be Keith but if we can't have Keith back then I wish they would move Martin Bashir up to that hour and maybe put Ezra Klein on late afternoon. I think Ezra would be a better fit for an afternoon time slot.. Happy Ed is at least still going to have a weekend show but boy am sure going to miss him during the week. Sigh!

Rhiannon12866

(205,429 posts)
43. I'm bummed, started listening to Big Ed on the radio
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 03:58 AM
Mar 2013

He's a voice like no other. You'd think his stock would have just risen sky high after Scott Prouty (the 47% recording guy) chose Ed's show to finally go public.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
48. He "annoys" you? Oh well then..
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 05:35 AM
Mar 2013

That changes everything.

Hate to be blunt about it, but, who cares?..That's what channel changers

are for. The importance of Ed is that a LOT of people like and relate

to him and he's the ONLY one on the MSNBC lineup who speaks

out consistently for unions and workers rights.

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
54. Never asked anyone to care.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 07:35 AM
Mar 2013

I appreciate that he speaks out for unions and workers rights, I just don't think we need a left Limbaugh.
And I do change the channel when the Ed show is on.
Maybe that's another reason why his show is moving.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
87. LOL!
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 02:25 PM
Mar 2013

Yes, indeed -- His show is moving because YOU change the channel.

I do hope you meant that to be funny.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
93. Um, yes you did.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:12 PM
Mar 2013

Re-read your post and learn to communicate better.


By the way, there's no "obviously" here...His wife was stricken by cancer last year

and, as another poster mentioned, he may well want to stay closer to home

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
96. I so want to tell you to fu_k off.
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 04:21 AM
Mar 2013

But that would be ungentlemanly like.
The fact that you think I believe that Ed moved his show for the sole purpose that I quit watching it is comical.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
97. I so want to tell you how st*pid you seem
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 04:49 AM
Mar 2013

but that would be impolite.

The fact that you can't see how your own clumsy, ungrammatical

writing gives that impression is what's truly funny.

Sky Masterson

(5,240 posts)
98. Is that supposed to hurt me in some way
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 05:17 AM
Mar 2013

I'm glad you got a laugh.
Now you go troll someone else (Since you are so much above me).



Wasn't this originally about how bad the ed show sucks balls..
It still does.
Now I will leave you to your witty response.
And I will ignore it.
Have a nice bitter life..

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
100. No, although if you're concerned
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 03:03 PM
Mar 2013

with other's trying to hurt you, you might avoid trying

to hurt or insult them. It's that "do unto others" thing.

I'm answering both of your questions: 1. "Is that supposed to hurt me in some way"?

No, it was my second attempt to show you that it was your unclear

writing, not my "weird" interpretation of your words, that was at fault.

Since my first attempt was answered by you with total snark, you'll have to excuse

me if I wasn't overly sensitive to your feelings on the second go round. It's the "do unto others" thing again.

B. "Wasn't this originally about how the ed show sucks balls"?

No, that was your opinion and that of some others, but if you read all or most of the thread,

you'd see that at least half the posters LIKED the Ed show and were sorry to see it go to weekends only.

Truthfully, you sound kind of young and immature, so I'm honestly not interested in fighting with you.

In saying that, I must also tell you that I'm about the least bitter person you're likely to meet right now.

Maybe you're projecting your own bitterness onto me. Sometimes that comes from depression

and I certainly don't wish that on you, as I was once young and depressed and know how hard that can be.

I think it might be best if we ignore each other for now, but I do hope that you

work out whatever is bothering you, and I do mean that sincerely.





 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
107. do you read what you write before you hit post ?
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 01:06 PM
Mar 2013

I don't 80% of the time and I get ignored for it.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
51. Ed lost me the night of the first debate. Watching him, thought I was watching Fox
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 06:14 AM
Mar 2013

but then Ed was always a hard right conservative, til he flipped anyhow.
But since that night I haven't watched him nor Rachel nor ever will.(their own shows).
(goes without saying I never watch Matthews own show either.
One is either for or against. No middle, no back and forth.
If I wanted to hear Fox's views after the first debate, I might as well watched them.

Only Al Sharpton, and he called it correct debate night.

Ed lost me forever.

Ed's timeslot was the most powerful on MSNBC. That anyone would voluntarily move from it to the weekend when no one watches cable is beyond me. Whatever floats his boat.
But remember, he used to be a hard right conservative. So, what he really is is just an entertainer like Rush. Rush could have been Ed in different times, Ed could have been Rush.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
62. Sounds like you did want Fox News ...
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:21 AM
Mar 2013

... left version: Obama and Democrats can do no wrong -- ever.

But Pres. Obama lost the first debate and Chris and Ed and Rachel reported the facts.

The best thing about MSNBC is that while it is liberal, it is not sycophantic to the left like Fox is to the right.

Matthews, Schultze and Maddow will call out Pres. Obama and the Democrats when that is warranted -- like proposing cuts to Social Security or bashing Harry Reid over his filibuster reform sell-out.


 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
71. I disagree with you. Chris and Ed were awful after the first debate. Only Rachel and Al reported
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:09 AM
Mar 2013

on the facts. They didn't get all emotional and deranged like Ed and Chris did.

I do agree with you on this fact: Liberals will hold Obama/Democrats accountable for poor decisions. I love that about Ed. I love that about the rest of them.

However, that first debate fiasco was too much. They basically pushed the *false* meme that Obama was going to lose the election. Debates don't have that much of an impact on the outcome of elections. Were that the case, both Gore and Kerry would've been elected. Their behavior was over the top that night.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
74. President Obama roped the dopes, Mitt gave it all he got, as proved had nothing but flailing
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:16 AM
Mar 2013

and Mitt was the big loser.

Personally, I would cancel the mock debates, they are not debates at all, but a waste of campaign time.

I like early voting, have it start the month before the first debate so no one is again influenced by a gotcha like 1980 and others.

Harry Reid is a boxer, and a master technician. He knows things others don't.

And becuase of 2010, one has to worry about losing the senate temporarily for 2 years
(2016 is better because of all who are running then, and in 14 will have coattails.

Republicans didn't win 2010, stupid protest votes gave us Walker and Scott and Christie and everyone else.

SpartanDem

(4,533 posts)
79. Lol in what universe?
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 11:34 AM
Mar 2013

Obama was passive in that first debate and let Mitt lie as of there was no tomorrow. The idea that the his loss was part scheme is just too freaking stupid no politician intentionally loses debates. I had no issues with Ed and Rachel that night, and they had nothing but praise when he wiped floor with Romney in that second debate.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
82. the Rope-a-dope works every time. President Obama knocked Mitt out 3 times.
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 11:54 AM
Mar 2013

BTW, the only other person besides Rev. Al Sharpton who had it right was Dennis Haysbert who played the President on 24. He was promoting something the morning after the debate, and he told the local morning show exactly what i said that night.

[img][/img]

earthside

(6,960 posts)
84. I absolutely agree with you on that ...
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 12:35 PM
Mar 2013

... these so-called 'debates' should become a thing of the past.

They have become media events with little regard for substance. A person can underperform (like Obama in the first debate), but essentially they are so scripted and formulaic that they are meaningless.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
63. Al Sharpton was a STAND-OUT in his election commentary
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:36 AM
Mar 2013

He made the rest of that panel look like amateurs. I have never been as impressed at his ability to translate the scope of an election in the way he did that night. I have to hand it to him.

Sam

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
102. Only Obama-bots would think that Obama did great on debate #1
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 03:43 PM
Mar 2013

Obama was awful in that first debate and Ed and Chris were right to opine about it.

I refuse to watch Sharpton's show on MSNBC because he said that he would never criticize Obama. So if you are an Obama-bot, that show is for you.

Ghost of Tom Joad

(1,355 posts)
53. Nightmare scenario
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 07:17 AM
Mar 2013

they put little Luke Russert on.

On the other hand if they could steal away Soledad O'Brien

bucolic_frolic

(43,173 posts)
55. TPTB have spoken
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 07:42 AM
Mar 2013

Ed was allowed to move the needle to the middle a wee bit
with some gutsy stands on unions, Social Security, Medicare, etc.

But that's all for now. I think the network is somewhat wise, in that
they will blow whichever way the political winds blow for ratings sake.

Ed had no upside to that right now.

AndyA

(16,993 posts)
56. I think Ed's schedule has left him with zero spare time
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 08:02 AM
Mar 2013

A radio show and an hour long television show five times a week doesn't leave much time. I heard that Ed requested this change, partly because he wanted to be able to spend time with his wife, who was treated for cancer last year, and he wanted to be able to travel some to do location reporting.

Last I checked, Ed's ratings were holding their own, and there's no doubt MSNBC needs to seriously overhaul their weekends.

I have a difficult time understanding Ezra Klein at times, and his delivery lacks personality. I would probably not watch him on a regular basis, although I think he does a decent job as a stand in on other shows.

I would love to see Olbermann back, but don't see that happening, unless the powers that be at MSNBC are prepared to tolerate him in return for increased revenues. Joy Reid would be an excellent choice as well.

mtasselin

(666 posts)
58. Thank You
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 08:53 AM
Mar 2013

Ed, thank you for everything you have done. My wife will not be happy about your move because I will be watching you on the weekends now. Keep up the fight, start talking about the Trans Pacific Partnership, the American people need to know.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
66. At least he'll still have his radio show. I enjoy listening to Ed everyday. Sad to see him leave the
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:53 AM
Mar 2013

TV show, but I can still listen to him and tape the weekend show.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
67. his radio show is better
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 09:54 AM
Mar 2013

his radio show is a lot better than his tv show. he has control over his radio show and hopefully he`ll have control over his new tv show.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
73. I agree. There's not a day that goes by where I don't listen to his radio show. Luckily I have the
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 10:13 AM
Mar 2013

podcast subscription. Been listening to Ed now since he first aired. He is much better and freer.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
81. I will be taping his show every day. I have been watching him exclusively lately. Sorry to see him
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 11:46 AM
Mar 2013

go but also like Chris.

agentS

(1,325 posts)
95. It's fine either way for me.
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 02:56 AM
Mar 2013

I live overseas so I can't watch him live most of the time. I always catch up on MSNBC on the website anyhow.
At least with this move, I can watch him on Sunday morning my time on the bootleg feed (while heating up some oatmeal) and catch a Hornets game feed at 9am.

Catching his radio show live is a pain in the ass- on those days when he's in studio (usually Mike P. fills in for him. You can see his work in the Video & Multimedia section of DU from time to time. He's awesome).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ed Schultz Leaving MSNBC ...