Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 10:24 PM Mar 2013

Committee OKs new restrictions on state workers' union

Source: Knox News

Committee OKs new restrictions on state workers' union

Officials debate motorcycle seat belt, helmet laws
By Tom Humphrey

Posted March 13, 2013 at 9:53 p.m.

NASHVILLE — A bill putting new restrictions on the Tennessee State Employees Union — enough to disable or eliminate many of the organization’s functions, according to a TSEA official — won approval of the House State Government Committee on Wednesday.

The bill (House Bill 913) is being pushed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and is sponsored by House Republican Caucus Chairman Glen Casada, who said it is intended to assure that state employee dues “do not go into political areas.”

But Sarah Adair, director of government affairs for TSEA, said the bill actually forbids TSEA from using dues money for anything but collective bargaining, enforcing a bargaining contract or helping members with grievance procedures. The bill permits lobbying only to the extent of contacting the group’s own members.

Since Tennessee prohibits state employee collective bargaining and there are no contracts, the organization would effectively be left to do nothing but handle grievances, she said. And even that may be in doubt because a state law enacted last year eliminates the term “grievance” in state law and instead sets up an appeals system for a state work who believes he or she has been wrongly disciplined or discharged, Adair said.


Read more: http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2013/mar/13/committee-oks-new-restrictions-on-state-workers/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Committee OKs new restrictions on state workers' union (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2013 OP
They really have some pretty dirty dogs down there Samantha Mar 2013 #1
SCOTUS Citizen's United decision should apply to unions csziggy Mar 2013 #2
Tell me again why state and local elections don't matter? nt kelliekat44 Mar 2013 #3
I am a retired Union carpenter, dotymed Mar 2013 #4
TN is just a testing ground for this type of legislation LeftNeckChick Mar 2013 #5

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
1. They really have some pretty dirty dogs down there
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 10:32 PM
Mar 2013

And I say that regretfully because my family is from Tennessee.

Sam

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
2. SCOTUS Citizen's United decision should apply to unions
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 10:43 PM
Mar 2013

The same as it does to corporations. It sounds as though the Tennessee bill is intended to restrict the First Amendment rights of the union (and by extension the union members) - which under Citizen's United is unconstitutional!

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
4. I am a retired Union carpenter,
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 07:21 AM
Mar 2013

living in TN. Here the Union is powerless and most (uninformed) citizens think that Unions are evil. What a bunch of back-woods idiots. They would rather their bosses make all profits...

LeftNeckChick

(7 posts)
5. TN is just a testing ground for this type of legislation
Thu Mar 14, 2013, 08:52 AM
Mar 2013

Typical... Republicans know they can't win elections on the issues, so they're making every change they can to manipulate the election. We're seeing the spread of voter id laws, we've seen the gerrymandering, and they'll most likely get a big gift from SCOTUS when the Voting Rights Act is over turned. But that's not enough for the greedy bastards... now they want to make sure their corporate buddies can donate, but the one semi-equivalent (as in - still doesn't come close to the money of big business) shouldn't be allowed to contribute to elections. This is a perfect example of why we need publicly financed elections. I won't be surprised to see these bills pop up around the country - or to find out that ALEC is behind this one.

Until people wake up and stop voting against their own best interest, we're doomed. And at this point, even if they do, they're gonna have one damn hard time getting their vote to count for anything.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Committee OKs new restric...