NLRB To Seek Supreme Court Review in Noel Canning v. NLRB

[Omaha Steve]

Source: NLRB

The National Labor Relations Board has determined not to seek en banc rehearing in Noel Canning v. NLRB, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit held that the January 4, 2012 recess appointments of three members to the Board were invalid. The Board, in consultation with the Department of Justice, intends to file a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court for review of that decision. The petition for certiorari is due on April 25, 2013.

Read more: http://www.nlrb.gov/news-outreach/news-releases/nlrb-seek-supreme-court-review-noel-canning-v-nlrb

---

Copy right exempt.

Contact:
Office of Public Affairs
202-273-1991
[e-mail]
www.nlrb.gov

[dreampunk]

1. There seems to be no more

to read at the NLRB website. Are these some board members appointed by Obama that this Noel Canning has some objection to? I will google this character but my guess is that he is some sort of tea party hack?

[dreampunk]

2. OK, I get it now...

Looks like President Obama really HAS been labor friendly, though we never HEAR anything out here in the hinterlands. Noel Canning could be any of a legion of faceless people put up by big ag/oil/fill in the blank to challenge and hinder Labor. Thanks for posting this Omaha!

[former9thward]

3. Noel Canning is not a human.

It is a Pepsi bottling company.