Budget cuts force military jets to drop air shows
Source: Associated Press
Budget cuts force military jets to drop air shows
By RUSS BYNUM, Associated Press | March 10, 2013 | Updated: March 10, 2013 6:18pm
SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) Even a rural festival celebrating the harvest of Georgia's famous sweet onions isn't safe from the federal budget battle 600 miles away, as automatic cuts are threatening to take away the star attraction for the Vidalia Onion Festival's popular air show: the Navy's daredevil fighter pilots, the Blue Angels.
The $85 billion in automatic budget cuts that took effect March 1 have thrown planning for the festival's air show into a tailspin, just weeks before the April 20 event that officials agreed to hold a week earlier than usual so they could book the vaunted group. The Navy plans to cancel Blue Angels shows booked next month in Vidalia and three other cities. And there is a good chance dozens more air shows across the U.S. could get the ax as well, leaving host cities facing threats of lost tourism revenue and dwindling ticket sales.
"It's going to hurt us," said Marsha Temples, chief organizer of the Vidalia air show, who estimates past festival weekends have drawn 15,000 extra people when the Blue Angels were on the bill. "People like to see the Blues because they put on an absolutely phenomenal show. You have people who actually follow them and a lot of people come from out of town just to see them."
While the Blue Angels' spring schedule is in doubt, the Air Force's formation-flying Thunderbirds and the Army's Golden Knights skydivers have canceled their performances outright. Combined, the three teams had booked more than 190 performances between the spring and fall. That's left many air show organizers scrambling to find replacements, such as civilian pilots with loud, fast jets from the Vietnam era or vintage planes from World War II. The uncertainty has forced others to simply cancel altogether.
Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Budget-cuts-force-military-jets-to-drop-air-shows-4343226.php
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)as the loss of government spending takes it's path through society.
PuffedMica
(1,061 posts)Wide eyed high school kids looking for adventure see those planes zoom by and think that they can do that too. Almost all of them end up doing support work for the Navy fueling the politicians' adventurous military policies over seas.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)I quit before I was "obligated" to serve.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Franker65
(299 posts)The thunderbirds and Blue Angels are really impressive. Sad that their shows are going to be cancelled. The Red Arrows, Frecce Tricolori and other display teams are still performing in debt-ridden Europe.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)useless waste of fuel
n2doc
(47,953 posts)All this still sounds like "cut the stuff that the public sees, not the fat". 1 less F-22 would fund all this and more, I suspect.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Lockheed wins by f-ing up and dragging out the development program.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/f-35s-ability-to-evade-budget-cuts-illustrates-challenge-of-paring-defense-spending/2013/03/09/42a6085a-8776-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_story.html?tid=ts_carousel
The biggest barrier to cutting the F-35 program, however, is rooted in the way in which it was developed: The fighter jet is being mass-produced and placed in the hands of military aviators such as Walsh, who are not test pilots, while the aircraft remains a work in progress. Millions more lines of software code have to be written, vital parts need to be redesigned, and the plane has yet to complete 80 percent of its required flight tests. By the time all that is finished in 2017, by the Pentagons estimates it will be too late to pull the plug. The military will own 365 of them.
By then, were already pregnant, said Air Force Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, who oversees F-35 development for the Pentagon.
When the F-35 finishes testing, there will be no yes-or-no, up-or-down decision point, said Pierre Sprey, who was a chief architect of the Air Forces F-16 Fighting Falcon. Thats totally deliberate. It was all in the name of ensuring it couldnt be canceled.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/how-the-f-35-defends-itself-against-budget-cuts/2013/03/09/275760fc-892a-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_graphic.html
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)The Duffelblog.com | 27 February 2013 | by Tony
Mullah Omar took to the media to offer harsh bipartisan criticism.
QUETTA, PAKISTAN As the United States rapidly approaches the deadline for sequestration, President Obama is getting support from an unlikely quarter: Taliban spiritual leader Mullah Muhammad Omar.
In a video released today, Taliban spokesman Zabibullah Mujahid read a statement from the groups supreme leader: I, Mullah Muhammad Omar, Emir of the Taliban, Commander of the Boy Brigades, Custodian of the Holy Poppy Fields, Rocker of the Casbah, Sultan of Swing
After several minutes Zabibullah was able to read the actual contents of the statement, where the Taliban leader addressed what he referred to as the dire consequences if Congress fails to resolve the sequestration issue:
- Peace be upon you, American infidels. As you are aware, because of your inability to pass a simple budget, you are facing up to $40 billion in defense cuts for your fiscal year 2013, Zabibullah read. While we are totally fine with these cuts devastating your military and economy, there will also be some catastrophic consequences for us as well.
Half our budget comes from skimming off your operations in Afghanistan. Without hard American dollars, hundreds of Taliban fighters will be laid off over the coming year and forced onto the streets to beg like common women.
Omars statement was rather apocalyptic at the consequences of the automatic budget cuts: With the money we have, we will barely be able to bribe members of the [Pakistani] Frontier Corps!
MORE
RedstDem
(1,239 posts)I can think of tons of shit to cut from the military
Blandocyte
(1,231 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)NOT!
bemildred
(90,061 posts)on point
(2,506 posts)askeptic
(478 posts)A lot of folks can enjoy an airshow without feeling like they are supporting world domination.
just imagine what we could save if we closed even 1/3 of our foreign installations - have you seen that talked about? What about disengaging from foreign wars? Closing Guantanamo? Policing the world?
But airshows gotta go - yep