Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,630 posts)
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 04:33 AM Mar 2013

Budget cuts force military jets to drop air shows

Source: Associated Press

Budget cuts force military jets to drop air shows
By RUSS BYNUM, Associated Press | March 10, 2013 | Updated: March 10, 2013 6:18pm

SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) — Even a rural festival celebrating the harvest of Georgia's famous sweet onions isn't safe from the federal budget battle 600 miles away, as automatic cuts are threatening to take away the star attraction for the Vidalia Onion Festival's popular air show: the Navy's daredevil fighter pilots, the Blue Angels.

The $85 billion in automatic budget cuts that took effect March 1 have thrown planning for the festival's air show into a tailspin, just weeks before the April 20 event that officials agreed to hold a week earlier than usual so they could book the vaunted group. The Navy plans to cancel Blue Angels shows booked next month in Vidalia and three other cities. And there is a good chance dozens more air shows across the U.S. could get the ax as well, leaving host cities facing threats of lost tourism revenue and dwindling ticket sales.

"It's going to hurt us," said Marsha Temples, chief organizer of the Vidalia air show, who estimates past festival weekends have drawn 15,000 extra people when the Blue Angels were on the bill. "People like to see the Blues because they put on an absolutely phenomenal show. You have people who actually follow them and a lot of people come from out of town just to see them."

While the Blue Angels' spring schedule is in doubt, the Air Force's formation-flying Thunderbirds and the Army's Golden Knights skydivers have canceled their performances outright. Combined, the three teams had booked more than 190 performances between the spring and fall. That's left many air show organizers scrambling to find replacements, such as civilian pilots with loud, fast jets from the Vietnam era or vintage planes from World War II. The uncertainty has forced others to simply cancel altogether.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Budget-cuts-force-military-jets-to-drop-air-shows-4343226.php

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Budget cuts force military jets to drop air shows (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2013 OP
And the ripple effect is just starting Sherman A1 Mar 2013 #1
The Blue Angles are mainly a recruitment tool PuffedMica Mar 2013 #2
I bought that militarist message and joined ROTC Kolesar Mar 2013 #4
LOL. TwilightGardener Mar 2013 #13
Sad that its come to this Franker65 Mar 2013 #3
welcome news quadrature Mar 2013 #5
Im still waiting to hear about hardware procurement cutbacks n2doc Mar 2013 #6
Lockheed has delivered F35s although they have not completed acceptance testing Kolesar Mar 2013 #9
Things are tough all over..... DeSwiss Mar 2013 #7
maybe drop sponsoring a car in nascar too RedstDem Mar 2013 #8
Waste of jet fuel. Put the money they'd spend on fuel into WIC n/t Blandocyte Mar 2013 #10
What a shame. lonestarnot Mar 2013 #11
Good. Way overdue. nt bemildred Mar 2013 #12
GREAT!! Only $500 billion annually more in DOD cuts to go! on point Mar 2013 #14
$39 mil is peanuts - they wanted to inconvenience as many as possible askeptic Mar 2013 #15

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. And the ripple effect is just starting
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 04:52 AM
Mar 2013

as the loss of government spending takes it's path through society.

PuffedMica

(1,061 posts)
2. The Blue Angles are mainly a recruitment tool
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 05:19 AM
Mar 2013

Wide eyed high school kids looking for adventure see those planes zoom by and think that they can do that too. Almost all of them end up doing support work for the Navy fueling the politicians' adventurous military policies over seas.

Franker65

(299 posts)
3. Sad that its come to this
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 06:15 AM
Mar 2013

The thunderbirds and Blue Angels are really impressive. Sad that their shows are going to be cancelled. The Red Arrows, Frecce Tricolori and other display teams are still performing in debt-ridden Europe.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
6. Im still waiting to hear about hardware procurement cutbacks
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 07:00 AM
Mar 2013

All this still sounds like "cut the stuff that the public sees, not the fat". 1 less F-22 would fund all this and more, I suspect.

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
9. Lockheed has delivered F35s although they have not completed acceptance testing
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 09:05 AM
Mar 2013

Lockheed wins by f-ing up and dragging out the development program.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/f-35s-ability-to-evade-budget-cuts-illustrates-challenge-of-paring-defense-spending/2013/03/09/42a6085a-8776-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_story.html?tid=ts_carousel

The biggest barrier to cutting the F-35 program, however, is rooted in the way in which it was developed: The fighter jet is being mass-produced and placed in the hands of military aviators such as Walsh, who are not test pilots, while the aircraft remains a work in progress. Millions more lines of software code have to be written, vital parts need to be redesigned, and the plane has yet to complete 80 percent of its required flight tests. By the time all that is finished — in 2017, by the Pentagon’s estimates — it will be too late to pull the plug. The military will own 365 of them.

By then, “we’re already pregnant,” said Air Force Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, who oversees F-35 development for the Pentagon.

When the F-35 finishes testing, “there will be no yes-or-no, up-or-down decision point,” said Pierre Sprey, who was a chief architect of the Air Force’s F-16 Fighting Falcon. “That’s totally deliberate. It was all in the name of ensuring it couldn’t be canceled.”


http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/how-the-f-35-defends-itself-against-budget-cuts/2013/03/09/275760fc-892a-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_graphic.html

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
7. Things are tough all over.....
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 07:01 AM
Mar 2013
- K&R

[font size=3]Facing Mass Layoffs, Taliban Protest US Sequester[/font]

The Duffelblog.com | 27 February 2013 | by Tony


Mullah Omar took to the media to offer harsh bipartisan criticism.

QUETTA, PAKISTAN – As the United States rapidly approaches the deadline for sequestration, President Obama is getting support from an unlikely quarter: Taliban spiritual leader Mullah Muhammad Omar.

In a video released today, Taliban spokesman Zabibullah Mujahid read a statement from the group’s supreme leader: ”I, Mullah Muhammad Omar, Emir of the Taliban, Commander of the Boy Brigades, Custodian of the Holy Poppy Fields, Rocker of the Casbah, Sultan of Swing …”

After several minutes Zabibullah was able to read the actual contents of the statement, where the Taliban leader addressed what he referred to as the “dire consequences” if Congress fails to resolve the sequestration issue:
    “Peace be upon you, American infidels. As you are aware, because of your inability to pass a simple budget, you are facing up to $40 billion in defense cuts for your fiscal year 2013,” Zabibullah read. “While we are totally fine with these cuts devastating your military and economy, there will also be some catastrophic consequences for us as well.”

    “Half our budget comes from skimming off your operations in Afghanistan. Without hard American dollars, hundreds of Taliban fighters will be laid off over the coming year and forced onto the streets to beg like common women.”

    Omar’s statement was rather apocalyptic at the consequences of the automatic budget cuts: ”With the money we have, we will barely be able to bribe members of the [Pakistani] Frontier Corps!”

    MORE



askeptic

(478 posts)
15. $39 mil is peanuts - they wanted to inconvenience as many as possible
Mon Mar 11, 2013, 08:57 PM
Mar 2013

A lot of folks can enjoy an airshow without feeling like they are supporting world domination.

just imagine what we could save if we closed even 1/3 of our foreign installations - have you seen that talked about? What about disengaging from foreign wars? Closing Guantanamo? Policing the world?

But airshows gotta go - yep

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Budget cuts force militar...