Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Senate Democrats to hold Super PAC hearings
Washington (CNN) - Senate Democrats announced Tuesday they will hold hearings beginning later this month examining what they see as the negative impact of super PACs on the election process.
They also will work to develop legislation to require the disclosure of all donors to the increasingly powerful political organizations.
At the hearings, Democrats will ask organizers and possibly donors to testify.
"The more the public learn about this, the more reviled they will be about what's happening," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York. "That involves having hearings and asking people why they gave and what motivated them. Showing people the affects."
SNIP
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/01/senate-democrats-to-hold-super-pac-hearings/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2125 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Democrats to hold Super PAC hearings (Original Post)
Tx4obama
Feb 2012
OP
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)1. Because NO ONE saw this coming....
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)2. ...
Igel
(35,309 posts)3. "Reviled"?
Perhaps "revolted"? "Repulsed"?
Unless, of course, having the public learn about this triggers a fit of anti-public vituperation and vitriole.
"Showing people the affects"? The emotional temperaments that the donors have? Or the temperaments and emotional/mental states of the people? Or perhaps he means "effects"--and I hope that it's the reporter (sic) misinterpreting a schwa more than something that Shumer or his aid(e)s vetting.
unkachuck
(6,295 posts)4. is Chuck right, now?
"The more the public learn about this, the more reviled they will be about what's happening,"
....or is he right like when he voted to kill Glass Steagall?
"That involves having hearings..."
....no need to explain any further