Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 07:52 PM Feb 2012

Senate Democrats to hold Super PAC hearings


Washington (CNN) - Senate Democrats announced Tuesday they will hold hearings beginning later this month examining what they see as the negative impact of super PACs on the election process.

They also will work to develop legislation to require the disclosure of all donors to the increasingly powerful political organizations.

At the hearings, Democrats will ask organizers and possibly donors to testify.

"The more the public learn about this, the more reviled they will be about what's happening," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York. "That involves having hearings and asking people why they gave and what motivated them. Showing people the affects."

SNIP

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/01/senate-democrats-to-hold-super-pac-hearings/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Democrats to hold Super PAC hearings (Original Post) Tx4obama Feb 2012 OP
Because NO ONE saw this coming.... Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #1
... Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #2
"Reviled"? Igel Feb 2012 #3
is Chuck right, now? unkachuck Feb 2012 #4

Igel

(35,309 posts)
3. "Reviled"?
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:27 PM
Feb 2012

Perhaps "revolted"? "Repulsed"?

Unless, of course, having the public learn about this triggers a fit of anti-public vituperation and vitriole.

"Showing people the affects"? The emotional temperaments that the donors have? Or the temperaments and emotional/mental states of the people? Or perhaps he means "effects"--and I hope that it's the reporter (sic) misinterpreting a schwa more than something that Shumer or his aid(e)s vetting.

 

unkachuck

(6,295 posts)
4. is Chuck right, now?
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:47 PM
Feb 2012

"The more the public learn about this, the more reviled they will be about what's happening,"

....or is he right like when he voted to kill Glass Steagall?

"That involves having hearings..."

....no need to explain any further

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate Democrats to hold ...