Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,025 posts)
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 01:34 AM Feb 2012

After Obama’s remarks on drones, White House rebuffs security questions

White House spokesman Jay Carney rebuffed questions Tuesday about whether President Obama had violated intelligence restrictions on the secret U.S. drone program in Pakistan when he openly discussed the subject the day before.

Obama, speaking Monday at an online town hall sponsored by Google, twice uttered the word “drones” as he explained their precise and “judicious” use against al-Qaeda targets. Asked if the president had made a mistake, Carney said he was “not going to discuss .?.?. supposedly covert programs.”

He suggested that nothing Obama had said could be a security violation: “He’s the commander in chief of the armed forces of the United States. He’s the president of the United States.”

On Monday, Obama was responding to “Evan in Brooklyn,” who said that the president had “ordered more drone attacks in your first year than your predecessor did in his entire term.”

full: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/after-obamas-remarks-on-drones-white-house-rebuffs-security-questions/2012/01/31/gIQA9s2LgQ_story.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Obama’s remarks on drones, White House rebuffs security questions (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2012 OP
If the president does it it's not illegal. n/t JayhawkSD Feb 2012 #1
With regard to military secrecy, that is true. JDPriestly Feb 2012 #2
He can unclassify a classified operation with a comment. MADem Feb 2012 #3
Congress fully legalized targeted killing. joshcryer Feb 2012 #4
This is just the usual right wingnut bullying of Obama. nt EFerrari Feb 2012 #5

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
2. With regard to military secrecy, that is true.
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 02:26 AM
Feb 2012

The president is the commander in chief. What he says pretty much goes. Congress has some authority over the armed forces, and the president can't do anything he wants in every areay, but the president, regardless of his party, is the commander in chief. As we saw with GW Bush, that is not always a good thing.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
3. He can unclassify a classified operation with a comment.
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 02:43 AM
Feb 2012

It is true; the people doing the classifying work for him. Up until he told us that Bin Ladin was history, that operation was highly classified, as an example.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
4. Congress fully legalized targeted killing.
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 03:11 AM
Feb 2012

If there was no security issue and he was fully transparent about each and every one, it would still be legal under the Third Geneva Convention. Basically Obama can kill anyone anywhere who is an unlawful combatant (ie, not represented by a state but using arms against people) and there's no law, nationally or internationally, that stops him.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»After Obama’s remarks on ...