Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bosonic

(3,746 posts)
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 07:45 PM Feb 2013

Six Washington state nuclear tanks leaking: governor's office

Source: Reuters

Six tanks at Washington state's Hanford Nuclear Reservation are leaking radioactive waste, but the leak has not posed an immediate public health risk, Governor Jay Inslee's office said on Friday.

Inslee spokeswoman Lisa Harper said that outgoing U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu had informed the governor on Friday that the leak involved six tanks. She said the leak had not been stopped.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/22/us-usa-nuclear-leak-idUSBRE91L19G20130222

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Six Washington state nuclear tanks leaking: governor's office (Original Post) Bosonic Feb 2013 OP
Note the use of the word .."immediate" health risk. dixiegrrrrl Feb 2013 #1
the whole quote is highly suspect, just like BP's "under control" statements wordpix Feb 2013 #6
Nothing to worry about . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #2
Only in Washington? AnotherMcIntosh Feb 2013 #3
I believe I saw recently where there is another move out of the DOE recently to patrice Feb 2013 #4
"Many a mickle makes a muckle." ~ Benjamin Franklin ("Poor Richard's Almanac") Journeyman Feb 2013 #5
Uh-- those drain to the Columbia River, right? Bette Noir Feb 2013 #7

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. Note the use of the word .."immediate" health risk.
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 08:01 PM
Feb 2013

So not leaking enough to kill anyone outright, I take it.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
2. Nothing to worry about . . .
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 08:04 PM
Feb 2013

A little radiation is nothing to worry about. Hell, I once saw a guy on television who said plutonium was so harmless that he would personally eat a vial full of it!

I wonder what ever happened to that guy?

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
3. Only in Washington?
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 08:13 PM
Feb 2013

In Illinois - 1/24/2012

Chicago, IL – The drinking water for 652,000 people in Illinois could be at risk of radioactive contamination from a leak or accident at a local nuclear power plant, says a new study released today by the Illinois Public Interest Research Group Education Fund (Illinois PIRG).
...
75 percent of U.S. nuclear plants have leaked tritium, a radioactive form of hydrogen that can cause cancer and genetic defects.

In December, 2005, investigators found tritium in a drinking water well at a home near Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station in Illinois. Levels of tritium above the safe drinking water standard were found near the plant, and much higher levels were detected on the plant grounds. The leak was eventually traced to a pipe carrying normally non-radioactive water away for discharge.

http://neis.org/release-nuclear-power-plants-pose-risks-to-drinking-water-for-illinois/

In California - 2/1/2012

"LOS ANGELES — A tiny amount of radiation could have escaped from a Southern California nuclear power plant after a water leak prompted operators to shut down a reactor as a precaution, but plant workers and the public were not endangered, officials said Wednesday.

The leak was detected Tuesday afternoon in Unit 3 at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, about 45 miles north of San Diego. The seaside plant was taken off line while investigators tried to determine what happened.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/radiation-leak-san-onofre_n_1247658.html

patrice

(47,992 posts)
4. I believe I saw recently where there is another move out of the DOE recently to
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 08:14 PM
Feb 2013

de-regulate some LOW-LEVEL radio-active waste. The last time I noticed that kind of regulatory move it was referred to as Below Regulatory Concern, because DOE wanted to change waste classifications so they could have more room at storage facilities. At the DOE regional hearings, back in the mid '90s, waste storage experts were still fighting the facilities at 4 Corners in the Southwest. Some came to the DOE meetings and told us details about the containers' structural problems and the problems shipping and storing the containers for long periods of time, well, I guess I should say for a lot less time than you'd think, because the corrosion and leakage problems with the containers start at way less than even a few decades.

Everyone needs more specific information about what is happening in this situation. We mustn't pretend it isn't there.

Bette Noir

(3,581 posts)
7. Uh-- those drain to the Columbia River, right?
Sat Feb 23, 2013, 01:58 PM
Feb 2013

Second biggest river in the US? The one I can see from my living room?

Not like.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Six Washington state nucl...