Six Washington state nuclear tanks leaking: governor's office
Source: Reuters
Six tanks at Washington state's Hanford Nuclear Reservation are leaking radioactive waste, but the leak has not posed an immediate public health risk, Governor Jay Inslee's office said on Friday.
Inslee spokeswoman Lisa Harper said that outgoing U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu had informed the governor on Friday that the leak involved six tanks. She said the leak had not been stopped.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/22/us-usa-nuclear-leak-idUSBRE91L19G20130222
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)So not leaking enough to kill anyone outright, I take it.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)A little radiation is nothing to worry about. Hell, I once saw a guy on television who said plutonium was so harmless that he would personally eat a vial full of it!
I wonder what ever happened to that guy?
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)In Illinois - 1/24/2012
...
75 percent of U.S. nuclear plants have leaked tritium, a radioactive form of hydrogen that can cause cancer and genetic defects.
In December, 2005, investigators found tritium in a drinking water well at a home near Braidwood Nuclear Generating Station in Illinois. Levels of tritium above the safe drinking water standard were found near the plant, and much higher levels were detected on the plant grounds. The leak was eventually traced to a pipe carrying normally non-radioactive water away for discharge.
http://neis.org/release-nuclear-power-plants-pose-risks-to-drinking-water-for-illinois/
In California - 2/1/2012
The leak was detected Tuesday afternoon in Unit 3 at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, about 45 miles north of San Diego. The seaside plant was taken off line while investigators tried to determine what happened.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/radiation-leak-san-onofre_n_1247658.html
patrice
(47,992 posts)de-regulate some LOW-LEVEL radio-active waste. The last time I noticed that kind of regulatory move it was referred to as Below Regulatory Concern, because DOE wanted to change waste classifications so they could have more room at storage facilities. At the DOE regional hearings, back in the mid '90s, waste storage experts were still fighting the facilities at 4 Corners in the Southwest. Some came to the DOE meetings and told us details about the containers' structural problems and the problems shipping and storing the containers for long periods of time, well, I guess I should say for a lot less time than you'd think, because the corrosion and leakage problems with the containers start at way less than even a few decades.
Everyone needs more specific information about what is happening in this situation. We mustn't pretend it isn't there.
Journeyman
(15,032 posts)Bette Noir
(3,581 posts)Second biggest river in the US? The one I can see from my living room?
Not like.