Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NeoConsSuck

(2,544 posts)
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:17 PM Feb 2013

Sen. Graham will hold up Brennan for Benghazi answers

Source: USA Today

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham says he is unsatisfied with the White House responses to questions about the attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Libya and he will block President Obama's pick to lead the CIA until more information on the Sept. 11 incident is disclosed.

Obama has nominated White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan to replace former CIA director David Petraeus, who resigned after admitting to having an affair.

But Graham told USA TODAY in an interview that he will not allow the nomination to go forward until the White House turns over items it has declined to provide, such as drone video of the attack and e-mails on talking points that falsely claimed the attack was a protest that got out of control.

The role of the Congress is to provide oversight of the executive branch," Graham said. "When Brennan comes up I think it's very relevant what role did he play?"



Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/20/benghazi-brennan-confirmation/1933915/



The batshit crazy in Congress keeps multiplying.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Graham will hold up Brennan for Benghazi answers (Original Post) NeoConsSuck Feb 2013 OP
How long did he hold up confirmations for any of the following >>>> Roland99 Feb 2013 #1
Lizzy can have Brennan Angry Dragon Feb 2013 #2
Prehaps he should grill McCain about arming Libyans spedtr90 Feb 2013 #3
"Benghazi answers" PSPS Feb 2013 #4
What? Benghazi, AGAIN!!! KansDem Feb 2013 #5
Agreed. This fixation is inexplicable in any other context riderinthestorm Feb 2013 #9
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA pangaia Feb 2013 #6
Go fuck yourself, Lindsey. City Lights Feb 2013 #7
That little southern charmer libodem Feb 2013 #8
What else is there to answer? Ken Burch Feb 2013 #10
Thanks, Harry. n/t DRoseDARs Feb 2013 #11
Fabulous! triplepoint Feb 2013 #12
I just don't know what these guys want to know. EC Feb 2013 #13
Condi Rice Under Oath chuckstevens Feb 2013 #14
Can someone please neutralize this person politically - finally? David__77 Feb 2013 #15
Obviously someone has the goods on him. He's just out there tap-dancing and sweating TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #16
Lindsey...Lindsey.....Lindsey, may I remind you what Hillary said: lucca18 Feb 2013 #17
do other dipolomatic posts have Benghazi-type security? quadrature Feb 2013 #18
Is this stupid melodrama a Republican scheme to deploy more troops? moondust Feb 2013 #19

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
1. How long did he hold up confirmations for any of the following >>>>
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:19 PM
Feb 2013

9/11

Anthrax

Iraq War falsified intelligence

any of the 12 attacks on US Embassies/Consulates that killed 60 during the B/C years

spedtr90

(719 posts)
3. Prehaps he should grill McCain about arming Libyans
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:23 PM
Feb 2013

It's about time....but that would be a bit tricky for Graham.

If the truth were told, John McCain, Joe Lieberman and Lindsey Graham made many trips to Libya pushing arms to the rebel terrorists that ultimately killed four Americans. John McCain was itching to get involved in Libya claiming the US would free the country of dictator Gaddafi but before that, McCain visited Gaddafi with the purpose of selling him arms and weapons. This makes people really think of how twisted McCain’s outrage is on the Benghazi attacks when he was promoting arming the rebels in the first place.



http://www.politicolnews.com/john-mccain-promoting-arming-rebels-and-terrorists-in-benghazi-libya/

PSPS

(13,603 posts)
4. "Benghazi answers"
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:24 PM
Feb 2013

As I've said before, I think this "Benghazi" thing is a holdover from the election when the GOP thought it would somehow get their boy into the White House. The fact that they're still harping on this, when the country at large doesn't care one whit, shows how out of touch the GOP is. Perhaps "Benghazi" is still hot within the RW media Wurlitzer bubble. I wouldn't know as I don't partake.

Having said that, though, I think Brennan should be scuttled anyway because I'm tired of having war criminals in my government, unless it's in a government jail or swinging in a government gallows.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
5. What? Benghazi, AGAIN!!!
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:25 PM
Feb 2013


Some right-wing "think" tank must have told the GOP this is the only issue with which they have any credibility with their base...
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
9. Agreed. This fixation is inexplicable in any other context
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:38 PM
Feb 2013

Oh I know the Rethugs can be completely irrational but the unprecedented obstructionism of Obama's appointees over BENGHAZI?

This does not seem to be a hill worth dying on imho.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
6. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:28 PM
Feb 2013

Just couldn't think of anything better to say.

Ok, back to spring training....games start in a few days...

libodem

(19,288 posts)
8. That little southern charmer
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:38 PM
Feb 2013

My stars and garters, if he isn't the bold one. Such a decisively strong and masculine man. Not.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
10. What else is there to answer?
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 10:32 PM
Feb 2013

It was a surprise attack and there's nothing anybody could have done to stop it, OR to save the Americans who died.

And it would have gone down the exact same way if McCain had won.

It really WAS what it was. Move on, Lindsey.

EC

(12,287 posts)
13. I just don't know what these guys want to know.
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 10:44 PM
Feb 2013

Do they really have any valid requests that haven't been answered many times over? Are all these repubs enraptured by right-wing media and believing all those crazy conspiracies?

 

chuckstevens

(1,201 posts)
14. Condi Rice Under Oath
Wed Feb 20, 2013, 11:13 PM
Feb 2013

About the August 6, 2001 Presidential Briefing:

Rice: "I believe the title was Biden laden determined to strike in the US." Gee Lindsey, where the hell was your righteous indignation back then? Give me a Fucking break!

I'll show the fuzzy math of the Republicans once again:

Bush/Cheney = over 4,000 Americans on 911, over 5,000 US Troops, over 100,000 Iraqi troops and civilians. Total 109,000 deaths on their watch.

Obama/Biden = 4 deaths on their watch

Hey Lindsey, McCain, and the rest you GOP hypocrites: You are 108,996 times FULL OF SHIT!

David__77

(23,423 posts)
15. Can someone please neutralize this person politically - finally?
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 12:52 AM
Feb 2013

It would be comparatively easy. I say this as a gay man.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
16. Obviously someone has the goods on him. He's just out there tap-dancing and sweating
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:14 AM
Feb 2013

every other day for an unseen boss--the voters of SC don't care about Brennan, probably don't even care about Benghazi anymore. I don't think it's just teabag-primary fear, I think he's really afraid of being exposed.

lucca18

(1,243 posts)
17. Lindsey...Lindsey.....Lindsey, may I remind you what Hillary said:
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:49 AM
Feb 2013

"I was so unhappy with the way that some people refused to accept the facts, refused to accept the findings of an independent Accountability Review Board, politicized everything about this terrible attack."

moondust

(19,993 posts)
19. Is this stupid melodrama a Republican scheme to deploy more troops?
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 05:08 AM
Feb 2013
In wake of Benghazi, rapid response Marine unit heading to Europe

Highlighting the continuing fallout from the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on an American consulate in Libya that took the lives of four Americans, defense officials told NBC News on Wednesday that the U.S. Marine Corps is on the verge of announcing a new group tasked with crisis response in north Africa and eastern Europe.

The group, which will be known as the Marine Air-Ground Task Force, will likely be based at Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily, Italy. The team will be capable of rapid deployment for responding to security threats throughout the region — including a U.S. embassy under attack.

~more~

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/20/17035177-in-wake-of-benghazi-rapid-response-marine-unit-heading-to-europe?lite


Is this what they've really been after?
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sen. Graham will hold up ...