Ceasing alcohol consumption leading way to prevent cancer death, study finds
Source: PhysBizTech
According to a study conducted by the Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) and the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH), the reduction of alcohol consumption can greatly enhance cancer prevention efforts by impeding the continual presence of carcinogens within body systems. Previous studies have cast alcohol as a prime perpetrator in cancers of the mouth, throat, esophagus, liver, colon, rectum and breasts; past investigations also suggest that alcohol has contributed to four percent of cancer-related deaths worldwide.
Using a lack of literature related to U.S. cancer mortality in association with alcohol as one incentive to delve, the Boston cohort set out for concrete answers to place on the page. Timothy Naimi, MD, MPH, from the Department of Medicine at BUSM, along with colleagues from the National Cancer Institute, the Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, discovered that alcohol promoted the deaths of approximately 20,000 cancer patients annually nearly 3.5 percent of all cancer deaths in the country.
Breast cancer was found to be the most alcohol-attributable driver of cancer death in woman, with 6,000 fatalities occurring annually approximately 15 percent of all breast cancer deaths. For men, cancers of the mouth, throat and esophagus were the most common causes of alcohol-attributable cancer death, also resulting in about 6,000 deaths annually.
Furthermore, the study team made a startling calculation of potential life loss due to alcohol-attributable cancer deaths, with a staggering 18 years assumed to be lost due to such conditions. In addition, although higher levels of alcohol consumption led to a higher cancer risk, average consumption of 1.5 drinks per day or less accounted for 30 percent of all alcohol-attributable cancer deaths, the report found.
Read more: http://www.physbiztech.com/news/ceasing-alcohol-consumption-leading-way-prevent-cancer-death-study-finds
maxsolomon
(33,360 posts)Might as well be something you love.
I wonder if "clearer" alcohol; vodka, gin, white wine, which have less congeners, would have less effect.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)12-year-old scotch?
Cancers of the mouth, throat and esophagus?
12-year-old scotch?
Cancers of the mouth, throat and esophagus?
I wonder if "clearer" alcohol; vodka, gin, white wine, which have less congeners, would have less effect.
I'll test your hypothesis and get back to you.
________
randome
(34,845 posts)With stem cell research, it's very possible we can all live hundreds of years. May as well live our lives as if we have something to contribute rather than just sit and drink and die.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)what if the next level is better?
GodlessBiker
(6,314 posts)maxsolomon
(33,360 posts)who am i to believe?
it seems most people manage to do both of the things you set in opposition.
randome
(34,845 posts)Everyone's is different. Listening to your body, more than anything else, tells you what's best. That may sound like New-Age claptrap but I don't think it is.
klyon
(1,697 posts)and it is illegal
Legalize now this is just getting more ridiculous every day
bamacrat
(3,867 posts)Swamp Lover
(431 posts)You may be able to find a study with stilted statistics, but there is no way that burning a plant and inhaling the smoke, any plant, has positive health attributes.
timdog44
(1,388 posts)stilted statistics used to say alcohol causes cancer. Agenda is a key word that is always hidden.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"like the same stilted statistics used to say alcohol causes cancer..."
What statistics are you referring to, and precisely how were they stilted?
"Agenda is a key word that is always hidden..."
What specifically leads you to believe there is a hidden agenda for this report?
timdog44
(1,388 posts)about finding stilted statistics in reference to pot smoking, and bringing up the same ethereal statistics of the alcohol study. And when there are no real statistics, it has been my observation that there is a hidden agenda.
But really, this is getting not nice and I'm out of here on this conversation. Someone saying they are not an idiot the way it was said below, implies others of us are.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Swamp Lover
(431 posts)Well, for one, I'm not an idiot.....
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Might just be your opinion.
roody
(10,849 posts)not necessary to ingest pot.
adigal
(7,581 posts)Arresting lung cancer. I will go look for it.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)great-aunt. She liked her Manhattans (but was anything but an alcoholic). She also was a lifelong smoker, and she never had children, so she had multiple risk factors. Still, she didn't get cancer until she was in her 70s and lived several years before it killed her in the late 1990s.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I too have a few relatives that are statistical outliers.
Smilo
(1,944 posts)who never drank alcohol - two had breast cancer. (And yes I have known those that drank and still died from cancer).
There is the old joke - guy goes to the doctor and doc says you need to cut out smoking, drinking, drugs, fat, etc. The guy says - "will it make live to a 100?" - doc replies "no, you will just feel like it".
Life's a beach, and then you die.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Think they have an agenda????
former9thward
(32,064 posts)There have been countless studies showing moderate drinkers live longer than those who don't drink at all.
From the Mayo Clinic: Moderate alcohol consumption may provide some health benefits. It may:
Reduce your risk of developing heart disease
Reduce your risk of dying of a heart attack
Possibly reduce your risk of strokes, particularly ischemic strokes
Lower your risk of gallstones
Possibly reduce your risk of diabetes
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/alcohol/SC00024
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Alcohol reduces morbidity rates from cardiovascular disease, and increases your risk of getting cancer. If you quit drinking, you lower your cancer risk, and raise your odds of having a heart attack.
It's lose/lose (or win/win, depending on your perspective I guess), so making a drinking decision based on your "health" is pointless.
And in the end, we're all going to die anyway.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... 3.5% huh?
From studies that probably don't control for things like heavy drinkers might be really unhappy people and stuff like that.
I think I'll do the same thing with this "study" that I do with the plethora of junk "medical science" studies that seem to erupt like zits on a 14 year old face - ignore it.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)My breaking point was the "lettuce will kill you" study a few decades ago. Not the toxic things they put on lettuce, just lettuce. They fed massive quantities to mice, you see - and they died.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)honestly, fuck that sideways
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Glad I quit that old habit when I did.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Going on 28 years clean and sober. Looks like it was a good idea in more ways the one!
Rhiannon12866
(205,839 posts)Kudos!
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)Another reason to feel good about my non-drinking self!
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)Thinking of the women I know who have had breast cancer, some survivors, very few consumed alcohol. A couple had an occasional glass of wine or beer but not heavy drinkers.
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)Time to shed some light on this subject. Personally I have always thought of alcohol as a poison and no longer drink it. Thinking back on some of my hangovers, I never want to feel that way again. Life is too short in my opinion.
Nika
(546 posts)This is just another bit of incentive to continue to stay away from it.
Both drinkers in my family died of cancer. Which proves nothing, but does give me food for thought.
surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)If alcohol consumption is a contributing factor in only 3.5% of cancers, how would not drinking be the "leading way" to prevent cancer? Wouldn't this leave the other 96.5% of cancers unaffected?
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Mountain out of a molehill. A headline that said, "Alcohol contributes to 3.5% of cancer deaths" would not get any views.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)This article says basically nothing about the methodology. I have read nothing else about it. It was sort of oddly written anyway. Possibly it's a correlational study, but nothing in this article sheds any light on the methods, the sample size, the statistical methods used, etc. Very poor.
I have my doubts that it's as strong as they say.
Here's a link to the study abstract:
http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301199?journalCode=ajph
Not much there. I don't know if that's a reputable journal or not. It isn't my field and the paper itself is behind a paywall.
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)ceasing alcohol consumption is also a way for me to have to confront my manifold problems.
daleo
(21,317 posts)Some people shouldn't drink for many good reasons, but I think a straight-up heart health vs cancer comparison is favourable to moderate drinking.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)regularly consumed with meals, do not have soaring cancer rates? They tend to consume it on a daily basis...
daleo
(21,317 posts)One theory is the Mediterranean diet is protective. Fresh produce, olive oil, fish...
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I wonder if that makes a difference...
daleo
(21,317 posts)Butter was considered bad for you in the past, now I think it's supposed to be ok.
Here's an amusing anecdote about butter.
I read a paper once that said butter consumption in toddlerhood correlated with high I.Q. later on in life. It was hypothesized to be good for brain cell development. I don't know if those results were ever replicated in other research. It seemed to work on my son, who sneaked butter by the spoonful as a toddler and is now doing an astrophysics PhD.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)You have made my day!
daleo
(21,317 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)that's cited.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)actually, since I go to Europe once a year I can observe their drinking habits and when I see some folks drinking in cafes at 11 am I wonder. I can't even muster a glass of wine at lunch...
Not that they pound it down. They don't. but I marvel that they can drink in the middle of the day.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I can't imagine drinking in the middle of the day. I'd have to take a long nap afterwards.
I hear you about the drinking across the pond. Its amazing to me as well. Every time someone gives me the frown about having a second glass I have to roll my eyes.
Here's a great commentary...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/03/22/can-you-be-a-healthy-drinker.html
"But what is moderate drinking? The answer turns out to be a tad less scientific than political or cultural. When I asked Michael Jacobson, executive director of the finger-wagging Center for Science in the Public Interest, he told me that one drink a day is moderate. And two? Two is crazy, he said. Thats when you get health and all sorts of social and psychological concerns.
But it defies reason that the difference between one glass and two is so drastic (and frankly, I dont like being called crazy). The US government generally says one six-ounce glass a day for women is OK, and two for men (women metabolize alcohol differently than men, so it affects us more, even if were as large). The French consider three drinks for women, and 4.5 for men to be moderate. In the Netherlands, both genders get 2.75 drinks per day. The UK is slightly higher than the United States, letting women drink 1.75 drinks per day, and men 2.75 before theyre considered over-moderate.
Whatever the cultural definition of moderate, studies find different health results at different levels of drinkingin some cases, most benefits are seen at three drinks per dayand of course everything depends on a persons individual weight, exercise and eating habits, and ability to tolerate alcohol. The sorry truth is that epidemiological studies rarely offer much good individual advice.
At Oldways, an organization that touts the benefits of the Mediterranean Diet, president Dun Gifford considers two drinks a daymaybe threeto be moderate, if they are consumed with meals. You have a glass or two, sometimes three, and it eases tension, it makes us more social, and thats a good thing for the human animal and for society, he says. A little bit of buzz doesnt hurt people if theyre careful about it. "
Cheers!
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)BUT you know that they don't have the same preservatives in their wine there, don't you? So you don't get any of the same effects as you do here.
In northern Italy I tried a wine in a local vineyard at about 10 am (kinda hesitantly) but apart from feeling a little dopey at first, it was an OK experience. Their bathrooms were a worst experience...the wine dopiness wore off pretty soon, tho...
timdog44
(1,388 posts)Plus, the next big study will show that moderate alcohol intake prevents cancer.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Danmel
(4,919 posts)And she never smoked a cigarette in her life, and in the 27 years I knew her, she may have had one complete bottle of wine the entire time.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Baclava
(12,047 posts)who wants to go through life sober?
tavernier
(12,396 posts)Oh, wait... I never have any left over wine...
Cheers!
timdog44
(1,388 posts)what those wine stoppers were for. My father-in-law gave us one and we have never used it.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)according to the
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/prevention/redwine
Scairp
(2,749 posts)That drinking every single day for 30-40 years will kill you sooner is not a new thing and this idea that it very slightly raises the cancer rates is not exactly a "eureka!" moment. Doing just about anything in excess will cause you to die sooner than you should whether you actually get cancer or not.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,136 posts)Yet she still got stomach cancer.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)my dad was a hopeless alcoholic, outlived my mom and eventually died of alcohol withdrawals while in the hospital because he fell.
name not needed
(11,660 posts)jzodda
(2,124 posts)They come out with one thing, then a new study contradicts an older one and then it repeats again.
I no longer read about them or listen when they report on them. I believe overall in moderation and I will just stick to that and be happy.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)As a type 1 diabetic, alcohol can lower your blood sugar without you feeling the effects until it gets really low. Your liver has extra the amount of work to do. I might have a drink at holidays now and then but for the most part I hardly touch the stuff. Too many bad low blood sugar episodes.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Let the lawsuits begin.
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)before I can quit drinking.
Lasher
(27,632 posts)Cigars and martinis every day, and the poor thing only made it to 100.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)Damn.