AGP closes corn processing plant in Hastings (NE)
Source: Omaha World Herald
By Emily Nohr
The Ag Processing Inc. corn processing plant in Hastings, Neb., has closed.
The Omaha-based company announced the closure on Friday, effective immediately, citing ongoing economic challenges the ethanol industry is facing.
The company said its human resources department is working with the 43 employees affected but declined to say whether employees would be laid off or transferred to other segments of the business.
The decision to shut down our corn processing plant in Hastings was very difficult due to the employees affected and the loss of an important market outlet for area farmers, said Keith Spackler, CEO and general manager of AGP, in a press release. Our facility, like other corn processing plants in the Midwest, continues to experience negative margins due to higher corn prices driven by ongoing drought conditions, and lower ethanol prices.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://www.omaha.com/article/20130202/MONEY/702029937/1697#agp-closes-corn-processing-plant-in-hastings
Marta and I have been buying E-10 since 1977. Only 2 stations in Omaha offered it then. We still support E fuel, even though there are many that are against it for several different reasons. Environmentalists are still split on this issue.
43 jobs lost.
Archae
(46,337 posts)They just walked in, announced the plant was closing, and had everyone escorted out.
No warning whatsoever and the workers are screwed.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)I was a stranger there. Worked at the hospital, and the townsfolk went out of their way to make you feel unwelcome. One of the worse small town experiences I had. Alamogordo NM, takes the top tier.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)What an asshole thing to say. Wishing this upon anyone isn't very progressive. There are almost certainly kids and people who weren't mean to you that are going to be hurt by this.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)If you want to call me an asshole for my observation of a town where I lived, well, more like did penance, go right ahead. Such a cloistered den of right wing fanatics there as it was.
As for progressive, well I am not the PC, hand wringing type.
jerseyjack
(1,361 posts)the less corn directed towards ethanol, the better.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... another unbelievable scam, ethanol. Gives you half the fuel value of gasoline for the same price.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts)... when you have to do without petroleum based fertilizers. A lot worse.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)And composted manure from my horse. Never had any chemical fertilizers or any bought products. The corn was done in 6 weeks, grew like crazy every seed sprouted seemed like overnight.
Had enough to feed all the hens over the winter. plenty of chicken,eggs and corn for friends/family. What a 'renewable miracle cycle' nature hands us free. Other than the costs of seed and hatchery chicks and time. It's almost all profit.
... way to miss the point. Your small garden is not the issue. you'd be lucky to produce a few gallons of ethanol from your production. The huge corporate farms that grow corn for ethanol use huge amounts of petroleum-produced chemical fertilizers, some say so much that the energy value of the enthanol produced barely covers the energy value required to produce it. I don't know if that is true I have not done the research but I AM pretty sure that ethanol is a scam.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)The actual product ethanol probably can be made from most any type of grain/seed that has oil in it. perhaps hemp seed,palm seed,peanuts or soy beans would have more oil for ethanol? and leave more corn for animal feeds and moonshine
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Battery powered cars are the clean future.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Once you factor in the fertilizer, the plowing, the harvesting, the trucking, and the processing in the plant. But the corn lobby makes out great.
The only thing good about ethanol is that maybe we are producing less corn syrup as a result. But we are still producing enough to make a nation of fatasses and diabetics.
End all subsidies to the corn industry now. These are worse than subsidies to tobacco farmers because: a) they are so much larger, and b) they mostly go to the huge farming corporations, not to family farmers.
http://healthnews.ediets.com/health-topics/obesity-more-dangerous-than-smoking.html
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)America used to harvest 30 bushels of corn an acre..now we harvest 300!! bushels of corn an acre. Someone rips a huge profit margin out of that.
Come on Nebraska people, are you ranchers and farmers or are you surfs working the big aggie corporation farms?
NickB79
(19,253 posts)300 bushels per acre is the theoretical maximum when everything is done exactly right and unlimited amounts of water and fertilizer are used. My dad would have a heart attack from excitement if he ever grew 300 bushels of corn per acre on his farm.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)all the new seeds modified, yeilds are way up even in drout areas. The higher price demanded is more profits. I planted only a half acre, did it pure organic, very little water during the worse drout in texas. Must have been at least 100 bushels, my hens (50 hens!) ate corn, my horses had some, we humans ate corn and I still have some in the deep freeze.
300-bushel corn could be realized, plant scientist says - AgriNewswww.agrinews-pubs.com/.../300bushelcorncouldberealizedplantscien...Cached
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
Dec 27, 2012 He saw 300-bushel corn yields in 1985 and has since glimpsed corn yield in the 290-bushel-an-acre realm, so he is confident the high return ...
"corn yield 300 bushels an acre"
http://www.google.com/search?q=corn+yield+300+bushels+an+acre&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1&rlz=
my point is the talk of shortages and rising prices is price setting by big ag. for increased profits.
NickB79
(19,253 posts)Iowa's average corn yield was 166 bu/acre in 2006, which is just slightly above the 30-year trend line. Our highest average yield was 181 bu/acre in 2004. Iowa is increasing yield at approximately 2 bushels per acre per year; more than 60 years will be necessary to have a state average of 300 bu/acre.
With climate change kicking the hell out of the US Midwest and Great Plains farming regions, I seriously doubt we'll see all the stars line up for an average much higher than we have today. Like I said before, you'd need the perfect mixture of water (already in short supply and only going to get worse), fertile topsoil (harder and harder to find), and massive fossil fuel inputs (getting more expensive).
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Not many real farms left, big ag owns and manages so much of the croplands and lots of open land close to cities is banned for use for crops.
I don't know what the answer could be. I don't think our gov should subsidise any farms not directly managed by the family.
Have you thought about internet sales of ear corn direct to the consumer? a website, a paypal button is all it would take. I bet you could sell fresh ear corn for about 1/1.50 each ear (by the box full) and make a huge profit over what a wholesaler pays a farmer. corn could probably ship regular postal without all the package needs of other types of produce.
ROBROX
(392 posts)This place opened a few years ago and then closed. It is operating and looking for more product to convert. In California it is not abnormal to have 3 crops per year except for orchards. The ethanol plant would like farms to switch from corn to SAW GRASS. Not so great with producing ethanol, but better for the land.
Ethanol does not provide top horse power, and it could damage some of the gaskets in older cars. In California the refineries blend different products depending on the season to reduce SMOG and other pollutions. I guess this is why gas is so expensive or the GOP want to make BIGGER profits, though in GOP areas the cost is $0.20 or more cheaper than Democratic areas like S.F. or L.A.
BlueSpot
(855 posts)Ethanol plants close all the time when the economics don't work in their favor. Then the price of oil goes up and/or the price of corn goes down and they reopen. Unless they tore down the plant, which I doubt, this is temporary.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)It is obscene to drive big SUVs when there are people starving.
Ethanol fuels raised the prices of tortillas for millions of poor people in Central and South America. It is a shame really.
Omaha Steve
(99,665 posts)After Corn is used for ethanol, it is fed to cattle. Ethanol removes starch, not the protein!
And this below.
http://www.omaha.com/article/20130203/MONEY/702039940/1707#ethanol-industry-poised-for-surge-in-fuel-made-from-crop-waste
DES MOINES After decades of talk, the ethanol industry is building multimillion-dollar refineries in several states that will use corn plant residue, wood scraps and even garbage to produce the fuel additive.
The breakthrough comes at a key time for the industry, after the drought heightened criticism about the vast amount of corn used to brew up ethanol rather than be transformed into animal feed or other foods. The corn crop already was smaller than expected because of drought last year, and livestock groups were especially critical of how the 40 percent of the crop being diverted toward ethanol caused corn prices to soar.
The new cellulosic ethanol technology could quiet that criticism while also making use of material largely seen as worthless.
Experts said it hasn't been easy.
FULL story at link.
NickB79
(19,253 posts)We remove the grain, and feed it to people and livestock.
We remove the stalks and leaves, and feed it to our cars.
We then try to replace the billions of tons of organic matter that is vital to healthy soil, that we strip-mined from the land, with synthetic fertilizers made from oil and natural gas.
Only someone with no understanding whatsoever of how to maintain healthy soils would call crop residue worthless, as this article did.
This will not end well for us.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)what is left cannot be used to make tortillas for the poor.
farmbo
(3,122 posts)This is a Red Herring put out by the Petroleum Institute.
A modern ethanol plant has a far better carbon footprint than fossil fuels and the US renewable standard MANDATES that half the future ethanol must be made from cellulosic, non- food crops.
I totally agree with you on the SUV point, however.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)As the price of that rises due to shortages, they start using the white corn.
The price of tortillas in Centra America has gone up since the corn-produced ethanol went on line.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Corn ethanol would not be used in fuel except for legislation that prevents synthesized ethanol from being used as the oxidizer/octane booster.
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed