Woman's excuse for firing gun: Sheriff Clarke said it was OK
Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinal Online
A 36-year-old Milwaukee woman had a ready excuse when Milwaukee police approached her Saturday about firing a gun on the 2300 block of W. Burleigh St.
Makisha Cooper told police that Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. had said it was OK for her to arm herself, according to a criminal complaint accusing her of endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon while intoxicated and carrying a concealed weapon.
Read more: http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/after-firing-gun-woman-tells-cop-that-sheriff-david-clarke-said-it-was-ok-er8inmv-188904701.html
Awesome...
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)They are all so fucking cute.
askeptic
(478 posts)Yes, all 30 million gun owners are irresponsible because you have an example of one...
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)weird that delusion you all seem to share.
Threedifferentones
(1,070 posts)The delusion is mistaking a comparison for an equation. And gun nuts are people who have gone nuts over banning civilian guns, right?
dballance
(5,756 posts)the one gun owner. Nowhere.
By the way, "inference" is something one does on the receiving end. As in you wrongly inferred he was applying his statement to all gun owners. Implication is what is done at the transmitting end. As in I implied XYZ with my statement ABC.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)That being said it was still a very irresponsible message for a sheriff to send. Essentially telling people that LE isn't really there to help them in an emergency, just to mop up afterwards.
nick of time
(651 posts)Evasporque
(2,133 posts)nick of time
(651 posts)But the thread title is misleading to say the least.
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)So the title is not misleading it is reporting...
nick of time
(651 posts)JSonline is making it seem as if the Sheriff said it's ok to carry and shoot a gun while intoxicated and he never once said that.
But regardless, she broke the law and now will have to face the consequences for her actions.
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)to protect herself....and Sheriff Clarke encouraged people to "take charge", "help me out"....she wasn't going to get any help protecting herself from her crazy ass niece by calling 911, Clark said so...don't expect your call to be responded to in time....so she didn't even try, went out and got her gun and shot at her niece from the yard....
nick of time
(651 posts)for her illegal act.
How she interpreted his statement is on her, not him. Any reasonable person should know not to get drunk and carry and shoot a fucking gun.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)current gun laws.
Hmmmm. Maybe we need more restrictions.
nick of time
(651 posts)limit mag capacity to 10 rounds, better mental health care, better reporting by the states of felons to the NICS, just to name a few.
LiberalFighter
(50,991 posts)If the qualifier wasn't included or any other statement that precludes intoxication the public are going take it as being open ended. Too many people can be that stupid. People will believe that they will not be subject to prosecution when LEO declare they will not follow certain laws such as in Arizona regarding federal gun laws.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)I wonder why people don't trust the responsibility of those responsible gun owners?
nick of time
(651 posts)And now she'll have to answer for her irresponsibility in a court of law, won't she?
Sounds like the law is working as it should.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)she was going to have to answer for her irresponsibility in a court of law.
Gosh, the law is working great. Just glad her rights to shoot off a gun on a public street while drunk have never been compromised.
nick of time
(651 posts)I seemed to have missed that "right", maybe you can point it out to me?
Bottom line: she will now have to answer for her illegal actions, probably lose her firearms rights.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)We have lots of laws to deal with responsible gun owners AFTER they shoot something up while drunk. But nothing to prevent them from shooting something up while drunk.
Yep. She'll lose her firearms rights. For all those who are shot by responsible gun owners who subsequently lose their firearms rights, I'm sure that makes everything all better.
hack89
(39,171 posts)for example, we have no law that prevents a drunk from getting behind the wheel of a car.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)nick of time
(651 posts)making it illegal to carry a firearm while intoxicated.
I don't know where you got the info that it's legal to carry while drunk, but that's just plain false.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)states do not address the question, making it allowable since no law forbids the practice.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/04/us/04guns.html?_r=0
nick of time
(651 posts)States that allow it also allow for businesses to not allow it, and if you're carrying, you aren't allowed to drink.
Show me one state that allows you to carry while drinking?
Squinch
(50,957 posts)That's what I found with a quick look. I'm guessing there are more.
nick of time
(651 posts)They allow you to be drunk in a bar while carrying? I think not.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)nick of time
(651 posts)You cannot be drunk in any state and carry a firearm. You can have a certain BAL and carry a gun in some states, which, IMO, is wrong, but you cannot be legally drunk and be carrying a firearm.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)The original question was about drinking and driving a car. You can't. But it seems you can drink and carry a gun.
nick of time
(651 posts)which is stupid but still legal. If it were up to me, any BAL should be grounds for a charge of DUI, same with carrying a firearm with any BAL.
On edit: you can't have any kind of BAL if you hold a commercial driver license, that's Federal law.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)nick of time
(651 posts)And you are correct, you can't have an open container while driving.
hack89
(39,171 posts)You cannot carry a gun in public while intoxicated.
Damn near every concealed carry law in America makes that very clear.
Most states make it illegal to carry or use a firearm while intoxicated
https://www.google.com/search?q=firearm+intoxication&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US fficial&client=firefox-a
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)everyone is trying to point out that what Clark said was 100% irresponsible....
He said "Defend yourself until we get there.."....
nick of time
(651 posts)I live in the boonies where it will take police anywhere from 15-25 minutes to arrive, should I have to wait for police to arrive or should I defend myself?
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)nick of time
(651 posts)Don't even drink beer or wine. But thanks for asking.
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)I would say then...makes sure of your target, is it the last resort and then if so shoot to kill....so you only have to have one story.
nick of time
(651 posts)I hope I never have to fire a weapon in anger again at any human being. I'm a peaceful man who just wants to run my farm and live out the rest of my life in harmony.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)firing off guns in public streets.
As we see here...
She was irresponsible in her interpretation of what he said and now she will pay the price for her stupidity.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)enough to own guns from people who aren't responsible enough to own guns.
So I guess we need more restrictive gun laws.
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)lol
Bonduel
(96 posts)Someone can operate a crane responsibly for 30 years. Then one day crash it into an office building killing 15 people. There are laws against that but they don't tell you if that person is responsible or not.
Squinch
(50,957 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Every mountain is un-climbable until someone climbs it. Everyone is reasonable until they engage in an unreasonable act.
"Sounds like the law is working as it should." Not so much the law, but the indictment is working, else the drunken yahoos hunting near my place every weekend would not be drunken yahoos hunting every weekend near my place.
Kingofalldems
(38,461 posts)safeinOhio
(32,702 posts)it's the nail guns.
samsingh
(17,599 posts)and he's a role model for other idiots
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)dgibby
(9,474 posts)would be able to get her off based on what that idiot sheriff said. If anything, she might get a slap on the wrist, depending on the make -up of the jury.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,354 posts)I've taken a couple of gun safety courses. I don't remember the part about using a gun to settle arguments with a niece. Not even if you're sure the niece is wrong.
Fortunately, nobody was hurt by the aunt's stupidity.
jpak
(41,758 posts)yup
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I would say, More guns, more douchebags with guns. Unarmed douchebags are less of a societal problem.