GOP Senator: Hillary Clinton Faked Emotional Outburst At Benghazi Hearing
Source: Think Progress
On Wednesday morning, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave an emotional testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the Benghazi terror attacks, tearing up as she described the flag draped coffins of the victims. Clinton lost patience when Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) pushed her on whether or not she had immediately determined the motivation of the attacks, leading the senator to accuse her of ducking questions with theatrics.
In an instantly viral outburst, Clinton shot back, The fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest? Or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided theyd go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?
After the hearing, Johnson complained to Buzzfeed that Clinton had planned to become emotional as a way to avoid answering questions:
Im not sure she had rehearsed for that type of question. I think she just decided before she was going to describe emotionally the four dead Americans, the heroes, and use that as her trump card to get out of the questions. It was a good way of getting out of really having to respond to me.
Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/01/23/1487641/gop-senator-hillary-clinton-faked-emotional-outburst-at-benghazi-hearing/
Republicans continue with their latest conspiracy theories and attacks on women for being too "emotional."
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)I'm still not recognizing this person as the Wisconsin senator.
I'm still waiting for Russ Feingold's statement.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)beyond the description of douche bag, because these guys have far over stepped that term of endearment.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Turborama
(22,109 posts)Hemorrhaging Ulcers?
Ruptured Hemorrhoids?
Prolapsed Bowels?
TheTimmer
(81 posts)"Festering boils on the buttocks of humanity" has a nice ring to it
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)by comparing them to this, for lack of a better term, moron
Deep13
(39,154 posts)I'm guessing not after the ass-kicking Hillary Clinton gave him.
Delphinus
(11,830 posts)he did not, nor will any of his side, ever think of that as an ass-kicking. They will only ever see it as an evasion.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)So there's that isn't there. They know exactly what we think of them and they prove our point on a daily basis.
So do you really care what they think or how they rationalize their idiocy?
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)That he and his ilk live in a false construct of a bubble doesn't erase what fell out in experience for everyone to see.
Hillary didn't let them intimidate her or push her around. She showed them why her rank in government was above theirs--and that is what the thugs cannot stand. She's got solid, credible international chops and they know she's a juggernaut when it comes to the next presidential election, should she choose to run.
the only thing they've got is bluster.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)They FULL WELL see it for what it really is. But if they conceded that this incident is what it really appears and IS, they'd be seen as singing in harmony with the Dems. Their god forbid THAT! So they're gonna keep bawling that Hillary's hiding the truth, and that the incident was a big bungle on the administration's part.
No - they see it for what it really is - they just figure they have to hang tough to their lies to have any credulity with their dimwit base. And by "base", I'm talking about the common dolts that vote for them - not the corporate entities they've long ago sold their souls to.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Your ass is grass and the voters of Wisconsin will be your lawn mower. This turd is headed for the one term list.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Volaris
(10,271 posts)is there anyone over there she wouldn't absolutely CRUSH in a General Election?
Deep13
(39,154 posts)...is about to slap some sense--or try to--into Sen. Ignoramus.
blue_heron
(223 posts)of course, the female was faking it. But when Boehner cries he's authentic.
complain jane
(4,302 posts)ancianita
(36,058 posts)tavalon
(27,985 posts)Authentically an alcoholic.
complain jane
(4,302 posts)The whole thing was theatrics on both sides; the difference is that Hillary is putting these idiots squarely in their place and the GOP look like the whining group of children that they are.
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)The CDP, aka the Completely Duped Politicians
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)==============
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)The Rs want to inflict negatives on Hillary for all the obvious reasons, their own political gain.
Warpy
(111,265 posts)and so are the rest of us.
Tar and feathers are too good for you.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Gee, sounds like a personal problem Sen Johnson. Perhaps he's one of those Minutemen.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Scairp
(2,749 posts)Fuck you.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)No administration...including a Republican administration...would or COULD have handled Bengazi any differently.
Why do the Republicans keep acting like it one of theirs could have prevented those deaths?
Do they actually think keeping full troop strength in Iraq would have made any difference in a situation that occurred, rapidly, in Libya?
Or are they saying that McCain, had he been elected, could actually have PREVENTED the entire Arab Spring(or that McCain would have used U.S. force to keep Khadaffi in power)?
What...the...hell?
lexw
(804 posts)It is soooo obvious they are looking for dirt in a clean room.
However, I must say that I can understand (by the way Hillary was looking at her notes while making her replies) why they feel her replies were thought out before handbut hell, she HAD to be ready for those bastards. The GOP is looking for something to bring Obama down, and this is all they have.
CNN was interviewing a brother of one of the slain this afternoon. They asked him who he thought was to blame. The brother said he puts the blame on the groups and individuals who committed the murder. CNN replied, okay, so the killers are to blame, but what about on our side: do you think security was lacking, and who is to blame for that? He said yeah, there may have been an issue, but that will need to be investigated.
Talk about leading the witness!!!!
Folks, CNN is no better than Fox. I don't watch either (I saw this clip while at the gym), but it appears CNN may be the new Fox.
Sorry I didn't stay focused on my rant, but there it is.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)This hearing thing was an ALL DAY CAMPAIGN AD for HRC 16!!
It looked like jousting in the days of King Arthur....up they came, and just as quick, she knocked 'em down...one right after the other. They tried to goad and bait her, she treated them like kindergarteners who had pooped their drawers and needed to be sent to the nurse's office to wait for their parent to bring a change of clothes.
There's no usable footage that will benefit the GOP....however, there's plenty there to shame them and show them up as whining assholes!
tavalon
(27,985 posts)I, for one, would be happy if she went back on her word.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It was an "I have NO PLANS to run...." An "I'm not thinking about that sort of thing right now. Right now I have no intention...."
After the primaries, she didn't say she'd join the cabinet either. She was going back to private life...for now.
Also, any declaration of a run after the primaries would have been a suggestion that she would challenge the incumbent at re-election time. The press was working hard to create and maintain a rift at that time.
When she coughs up something like this, people will be disabused of any suggestions of intentions--but she has not done that -- not even close.
The term derives from the Sherman pledge, a remark made by American Civil War General William Tecumseh Sherman when he was being considered as a possible Republican candidate for the presidential election of 1884. He declined, saying, "I will not accept if nominated and will not serve if elected." Thirteen years prior, he had similarly asserted, "I hereby state, and mean all that I say, that I never have been and never will be a candidate for President; that if nominated by either party, I should peremptorily decline; and even if unanimously elected I should decline to serve."[1] These statements are often abbreviated as "If drafted, I will not run; if nominated, I will not accept; if elected, I will not serve."[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shermanesque_statement
tavalon
(27,985 posts)I was going to ask what a Sherman pledge was but you gave me the answer. Thanks.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Way to go, Hillary.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)voters chose instead of Russ Feingold? Really?
This is hard to believe.
As a kid, we often vacationed in Wisconsin (my maternal grandfather's mother & father were from there - so there were cousins and extended family to visit) I always loved going there. The families were near the lake. It was beautiful, the people super friendly. The kids were welcoming. I am just so sad when I see that state duped into electing rethugs. It pains me to see what the rethugs are doing to the state.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)First skirmish of the 2016 campaign.
Ferretherder
(1,446 posts)...on the morning of September 11, 2001, when you FIRST heard ANYONE tell you a plane had crashed into one of the World Trade Center buildings, did you IMMEDIATELY realize it was a terrorist attack, or did you, for even a fleeting moment, think it could just be a tragic aviation accident?
Sir, PLEASE answer my question!......NOW!
John2
(2,730 posts)his only defense because she made him look petty. What does he think the Republicans are doing? The only thing I see from them is acting and they are terrible at it.
Conium
(119 posts)Do not ignore the fact that Republicans cut embassy security funding. Put the blame where it belongs!
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/01/23/1487451/leahy-slams-republicans-embassy-funding/?mobile=nc
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Ian Iam
(386 posts)How apt that "johnson" is a euphemism for "dick," eh?
tartan2
(314 posts)best part of Ron Johnson ran down his mother's leg!!!!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,706 posts)BadgerKid
(4,552 posts)I'll just leave this here (John Boehner allegedly crying):