Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 09:59 PM Dec 2012

Claim seeks $100 million for child survivor of Connecticut school shooting

Source: Reuters

By Mary Ellen Godin MERIDEN, Connecticut | Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:36pm EST

A $100 million claim on behalf of a 6-year-old survivor is the first legal action to come out of the Connecticut school shooting that left 26 children and adults dead two weeks ago. The unidentified client, referred to as Jill Doe, heard "cursing, screaming, and shooting" over the school intercom when the gunman, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, opened fire, according to the claim filed by New Haven-based attorney Irv Pinsky.

"As a consequence, the ... child has sustained emotional and psychological trauma and injury, the nature and extent of which are yet to be determined," the claim said.

Pinsky said he filed a claim on Thursday with state Claims Commissioner J. Paul Vance Jr., whose office must give permission before a lawsuit can be filed against the state. "We all know its going to happen again," Pinsky said on Friday. "Society has to take action."

Twenty children and six adults were shot dead on December 14 at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. The children were all 6 and 7 years old. Pinsky's claim said that the state Board of Education, Department of Education and Education Commissioner had failed to take appropriate steps to protect children from "foreseeable harm."

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/29/us-usa-schoolshooting-claim-idUSBRE8BS00L20121229

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Claim seeks $100 million for child survivor of Connecticut school shooting (Original Post) undeterred Dec 2012 OP
Ah, jesus they're suing the wrong people. Nt Confusious Dec 2012 #1
And if the parents of the child survivor sue for $100 million undeterred Dec 2012 #2
I'll go you one better. Parents are more ghoulish... TheMadMonk Dec 2012 #7
Especially for hearing something over an intercom. undeterred Dec 2012 #9
Maybe it's the child who played dead? csziggy Dec 2012 #15
Then surely the suit would have mentioned that instead of the intercom. undeterred Dec 2012 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author ann--- Dec 2012 #26
Indeed. Just curious: how did they, or their attorney question everything Dec 2012 #40
F-ing sue the gun manufacturers and NRA, not the state. I live in CT, I have to pay for the child's wordpix Dec 2012 #41
Courts will answer "Is govt obligated to protect citizens in groups like Sandy Hook’s School?" jody Dec 2012 #3
and how is this protection to happen? police? Society is unprotected, but it is not the robinlynne Dec 2012 #6
That's my question. nt jody Dec 2012 #10
I'm with you. robinlynne Dec 2012 #16
The courts have already answered this. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #17
ummm sorry but the killer is dead. toss this one out nt msongs Dec 2012 #4
the state? the NRA I can understand, but the state? robinlynne Dec 2012 #5
They're suing the STATE? MADem Dec 2012 #8
I hope this gets coverage on the news davidpdx Dec 2012 #13
I saw the lawyer being interviewed on the regional news--he looks like a gadfly-flake. MADem Dec 2012 #27
+100000 "It needs to be a class action suit against the gun manufacturers." wordpix Dec 2012 #42
I was thinking much like in Runway Jury davidpdx Dec 2012 #44
Adam Lanza inherited nothing - he died TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #21
He outlived his mamma--because he killed her. He would have inherited half her estate if he was in MADem Dec 2012 #24
I believe CT has a statute that prevents a killer from inheriting from his/her victim. DeschutesRiver Dec 2012 #30
Ahhhh....but was "the balance of his mind disturbed?" MADem Dec 2012 #33
survivorship usually must be for 30 days to inherit, UpInArms Dec 2012 #34
I'm the first to admit I don't know the CT law. MADem Dec 2012 #36
This lawyer has been disciplined by a state licensing authority. Jefferson23 Dec 2012 #11
bad news lawyer added to the mix - just not right lunasun Dec 2012 #18
Creepy looking SOB--he was shooting off his mouth on the regional news this a.m. nt MADem Dec 2012 #25
Money grubbing ghouls trying to score over the bleeding bodies of dead children and teachers..... marble falls Dec 2012 #12
Better call Saul... -..__... Dec 2012 #14
Ha--too classy, Saul is! And better organized! MADem Dec 2012 #29
Suing for something which may well have saved their child's life. Wow, just wow. Lone_Star_Dem Dec 2012 #19
Ugh. Embarrassing. cthulu2016 Dec 2012 #20
Uh.. sendero Dec 2012 #23
This guy is the very definition of ambulance chaser. a11ig8r Dec 2012 #28
He is going for the deepest pockets, hoping for a settlement. djean111 Dec 2012 #31
he's not going for the deepest pockets, teh deepest are the gun manufacturers and NRA. Bring THEM wordpix Dec 2012 #43
So the parents didn't file this, bigworld Dec 2012 #32
Lawyers can't sue on behalf of someone. LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #35
Kick dipsydoodle Dec 2012 #37
. headline should be "anonymous coward hires ambulance chaser to cash in on deaths of children" leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #39

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
2. And if the parents of the child survivor sue for $100 million
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 10:09 PM
Dec 2012

how much do the parents of the 20 dead children sue for?

 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
7. I'll go you one better. Parents are more ghoulish...
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 10:20 PM
Dec 2012

...than the scam artists running fake charities.

That amount is obscene.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
9. Especially for hearing something over an intercom.
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 10:22 PM
Dec 2012

These children had some trauma but they were the lucky ones.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
15. Maybe it's the child who played dead?
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 12:19 AM
Dec 2012

And emerged covered in blood as the only survivor from her classroom. That's a whole lot more traumatic than hearing something over the intercom.

Sandy Hook Classroom Survivor Played Dead
By ABC News
Dec 17, 2012 11:50am

The lone survivor of one of the two Sandy Hook Elementary School first-grade classrooms where Adam Lanza allegedly shot and killed 20 children tricked the gunman by playing dead, the girl’s pastor said.

“She ran out of the school building covered from head to toe with blood and the first thing she said to her mom was, ‘Mommy, I’m OK but all my friends are dead,’” Pastor Jim Solomon told ABC News’ Lara Spencer this weekend.

More: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/12/sandy-hook-classroom-survivor-played-dead/


That child will have PTSD for the rest of her life.

Response to csziggy (Reply #15)

question everything

(47,500 posts)
40. Indeed. Just curious: how did they, or their attorney
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 09:43 PM
Dec 2012

arrived at the figure of $100 million? Countless therapy sessions? For the kid and the agonizing parents? And siblings?

Honestly, my first reaction was ambulance chaser.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
41. F-ing sue the gun manufacturers and NRA, not the state. I live in CT, I have to pay for the child's
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 10:58 PM
Dec 2012

trauma? The state did not cause the trauma, the nation awash in guns did, a madman did, Ms. Lanza who took her imbalanced kid shooting and left her guns around did. This kind of suit if it's allowed to go forward will bankrupt the state.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
6. and how is this protection to happen? police? Society is unprotected, but it is not the
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 10:19 PM
Dec 2012

dept of education's fault....

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
17. The courts have already answered this.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 03:21 AM
Dec 2012

Gonzales vs. City of Castle Rock.
Gonzales vs. City of Bozeman.

(Different unrelated Gonzales's)

The school had normal, properly carried out lockdown procedures. The asshole shot up the locked door to gain entrance. What the hell could they possibly have done different? Build a school like Fort Knox?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
8. They're suing the STATE?
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 10:21 PM
Dec 2012

The shooter shot his way into the school; it's not like they left the door open so he could saunter in. Besides, that level of involvement isn't for the state to ensure; it's more a local issue.

Why not sue the ESTATE of the deceased, rather than the state?

Since it's determined that Adam Lanza killed his mom, he and the brother would have inherited that million dollar mansion and all of her worldly goods, unless mom cut him out of her will--they'd probably get a better payday there.

Of course, there are at least 26 other families that probably merit a piece of that pie, too.

I think "Irv Pinsky" might be an ambulance chaser--he certainly chases cheap forms of advertisement:

The banner appears because Irving Pinsky, a New Haven, Conn., attorney, arranges for it to be there through Mr. Boyette. "The outdoor part of the 'Today' show is like a block party in New York City," said Mr. Pinsky, who added that he tries to help friends by placing the sign.
http://adage.com/article/media/a-brand-nbc-s-today-show-free/134241/

On edit--he IS an ambulance chaser...and apparently, a local New Haven "character:"

By Fred’s reckoning, the most glaring omission from the deck was Irv Pinsky, a personal-injury attorney who offers free legal advice to pedestrians on his lunch break. “You know, if you think you might slip, or you might fall, give Irv a call,” Fred said. “Ever see those umbrellas that say ‘1-800-lawyers’? You dial that number and Irv’s phone rings, right here in New Haven.”




Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/03/13/060313ta_talk_mcgrath#ixzz2GP6dftWS

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
13. I hope this gets coverage on the news
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 12:07 AM
Dec 2012

The survivors and victims deserve restitution, but as you said the state is the wrong party to sue. It will probably never go to court, but if it did it would put the state in a financial mess.

It needs to be a class action suit against the gun manufacturers.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
27. I saw the lawyer being interviewed on the regional news--he looks like a gadfly-flake.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 10:10 AM
Dec 2012

Attention-seeking cheeseball. No shame.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
21. Adam Lanza inherited nothing - he died
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 07:10 AM
Dec 2012

The entire estate likely goes to the one surviving brother. Seeing as how Nancy Lanza was a VICTIM, and Adam being dead so unable to inherit just how does it come about that the Lanza estate could be successfully sued? The only Lanza family member guilty of anything is Adam who did not inherit his mother's estate (he's dead) and owned nothing of value himself at the time of his death. And as Nancy Lanza was a victim and guilty of nothing her estate is untouchable.

Believe it or not, Nancy Lanza is recognized as just as much of victim as any of the others in this incident by the townsfolk which she is. It's only the rag press and DU that has been victim blaming the mother.



MADem

(135,425 posts)
24. He outlived his mamma--because he killed her. He would have inherited half her estate if he was in
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 10:01 AM
Dec 2012

the will, even if it was a momentary inheritance. They didn't die together in a horrible accident--Mom with the money died, and that money would have been distributed to her two sons, unless she had a will that said "Don't give the one that plays video games all day anything."

I am not "blaming" the mother though I do think she played an unintended and entirely preventable role in this tragedy. Who in their right mind brings a kid with a thousand yard stare and glaringly apparent socialization issues to shooting ranges in the woods and teaches them to operate semi-automatic weapons? Who in their right mind stores their weapons, unsecured, next to said adult child's basement lair? She wasn't thinking. Now, she'll never do that again.

Her status as a victim has been swept under the rug, but not just by the press or this little discussion board--she's left out of the body count in the town, too: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/nancy-lanza-newtown-memorial_n_2344910.html

NEWTOWN, Conn. -- When people here speak of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School, they use the number 26: the ones killed after Adam Lanza stormed his way into the school.

When the bells of Newtown toll mournfully Friday morning to honor the victims of last week's shooting rampage, they'll do so 26 times, for each child and staff member killed.

Rarely do residents mention the first person police said Lanza killed that morning: his mother, Nancy, who was shot in the head four times while she lay in bed....In a small town where multiple funerals are taking place each day, where black-clad mourners stand in lines waiting to say goodbye to another child, many are incredibly angry at Nancy Lanza for not keeping her guns away from her son.

...




DeschutesRiver

(2,354 posts)
30. I believe CT has a statute that prevents a killer from inheriting from his/her victim.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 10:22 AM
Dec 2012

Absent a conviction (which you can't get here because Adam killed himself too), the courts can determine if he would have been convicted and if so, disallow an inheritance is typically how it works where such statutes exist.

Some states have variations of Slayer statutes, some preventing the killer from inheriting and profiting from the slaying, and I think a few even prevent children of the killer from inheriting. Others handle murder suicides in ways that I find odd, so it depends upon the state.

If CT does have such a statute, then it wouldn't make any difference what her will said given the circumstances of her death.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
33. Ahhhh....but was "the balance of his mind disturbed?"
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 10:35 AM
Dec 2012

Then he's not guilty by reason of insanity.

Your point is salient, though, as CT does have such a statute: http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/ACT/PA/2009PA-00201-R00SB-01031-PA.htm

(C) In the absence of such a conviction or determination, the Superior Court may determine by the common law, including equity, whether the named beneficiary is entitled to any benefit under the policy or annuity.

(D) In any proceeding brought under this subsection, the burden of proof shall be upon the person challenging the eligibility of the named beneficiary for benefits under a life insurance policy or annuity.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
36. I'm the first to admit I don't know the CT law.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 02:51 PM
Dec 2012

The Slayer thing could be a problem, too. I have read of cases where the decision as to where the money goes, though, depends on who died when, and in short order.

As someone else noted, this ambulance chaser could just as easily sue the estate of the dead mother for providing Junior with unfettered access to her guns. I think the guy is a vulture, myself...

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
11. This lawyer has been disciplined by a state licensing authority.
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 10:39 PM
Dec 2012

State Citation type Year cited Last updated by Avvo
Connecticut Suspended 2003 06/20/2012
Connecticut Reprimand 1989 06/20/2012

http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/06511-ct-irving-pinsky-1449309.html#licenses

marble falls

(57,134 posts)
12. Money grubbing ghouls trying to score over the bleeding bodies of dead children and teachers.....
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 10:58 PM
Dec 2012

Shame, shame, shame.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
19. Suing for something which may well have saved their child's life. Wow, just wow.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 04:37 AM
Dec 2012

My understanding is it was turned on while the shooter was with the principal in an attempt to warn the teachers, staff and students to what was taking place.

I hope they don't put this child through any more hell in their attempts to benefit financially from this tragedy.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
23. Uh..
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 08:18 AM
Dec 2012

.... you will have to sue the Lanza estate, the school district is NOT CULPABLE in this incident.

Some people are just SO DAMN LOW.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
31. He is going for the deepest pockets, hoping for a settlement.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 10:24 AM
Dec 2012

I had always thought that one can't inherit an estate through murder, so no use suing the shooter.
But - if blame can be put on the mother, than the mother's estate can be sued before it is distributed.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
43. he's not going for the deepest pockets, teh deepest are the gun manufacturers and NRA. Bring THEM
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:04 PM
Dec 2012

to justice and to their knees, not the whole state of CT which is struggling in most quarters to survive the recession still hitting the state.

LiberalFighter

(50,993 posts)
35. Lawyers can't sue on behalf of someone.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 02:11 PM
Dec 2012

Unless they somehow have standing to do so. They need to have a client I believe. That client would have to have some connection as allowed by state law.

Response to undeterred (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Claim seeks $100 million ...