Sen. Bob Casey changes stance, supports new gun laws
Source: Philadelphia Inquirer
WASHINGTON - Sen. Bob Casey, who has long opposed new gun laws, said Wednesday that he had changed his views in the aftermath of last week's shootings in Newtown, Conn., and would support bills to ban assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips.
In an interview in his office, the ordinarily staid Casey (D., Pa.) told The Inquirer that he was "haunted" by the images and reports of children killed in their school, and teachers slain trying to protect them. He said his wife confronted him as he reassessed the issue over the weekend.
Furrowing his brow and casting his eyes downward, Casey expressed regret that he had not reconsidered his views as starkly after earlier massacres at Virginia Tech and in Aurora, Colo.
"The power of the weapon, the number of bullets that hit each child, that was so, to me, just so chilling, it haunts me. It should haunt every public official," said Casey, who won a second term six weeks ago while touting his opposition to gun control.
Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/congressional/20121220_Sen__Bob_Casey_changes_stance__supports_new_gun_laws.html
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)just perhaps, we are seeing the tipping point.
Cosmocat
(14,575 posts)The event is signficant, but it is no coincidence that he had his come to Jesus moment right after he got a 6 year reup.
He also is a senator.
The issue is not the senate, the issue is a House run by radical right wing jackasses.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)but, it's a huge start.
rosesaylavee
(12,126 posts)it would be hard for me NOT to feel I had blood on my hands.
Let's hope they get these weapons off the street sooner rather than later.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Every last nationally elected official should have to survey that carnage firsthand. Then come back and explain why gun rights should be even less regulated.
still_one
(92,433 posts)mwb970
(11,367 posts)blue neen
(12,328 posts)...thought you might just want to know.
still_one
(92,433 posts)Coverage?
That is anti-birth control thought you just might want to know
However I will concede at times one can argue he is conflicted
blue neen
(12,328 posts)and called his office to let Senator Casey and his staff know it.
If you want to know why he voted for the measure, you could call his office and ask why. It's a fair question.
still_one
(92,433 posts)Sincere when I said Casey is conflicted at times, and I meant that in a good way
I will also agree, at least on most social issues he is progressive
Ter
(4,281 posts)Banning condoms or birth control pills would, and he doesn't support that.
still_one
(92,433 posts)When the blunt amendment does include Viagra, it is pretty anti-women as I see it
hatrack
(59,593 posts)The only variable with these assholes is the length of the chain, which dictates how much time it takes for their necks to be snapped back by their masters.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)like they did on the invading Iraq vote.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)democrattotheend
(11,607 posts)He's anti-choice but he's always been a strong labor backer. And good on other economic issues as well.