Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 04:54 PM Dec 2012

Judge Rules For Censorship Of Torture Testimony At Guantánamo Military Commission

Source: ENews Park Forest

NEW YORK --(ENEWSPF)--December 12 - The judge presiding over the Guantánamo Bay military commission 9/11 trial has approved the government’s request to censor any testimony from the defendants relating to their torture. The American Civil Liberties Union had challenged the government’s request, arguing that the American public has a First Amendment right to hear the testimony. The ACLU plans to seek further review of the ruling, which was released today.

Military Judge Col. James Pohl ruled that any statements by the defendants’ concerning their treatment – including torture while in U.S. custody – could be kept from the public as classified, and upheld the continued use of a 40-second delay audio feed of the proceedings.

“We’re profoundly disappointed by the military judge’s decision, which didn’t even address the serious First Amendment issues at stake here. The government wanted to ensure that the American public would never hear the defendants’ accounts of illegal CIA torture, rendition and detention, and the military judge has gone along with that shameful plan,” said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Program. “For now, the most important terrorism trial of our time will be organized around judicially approved censorship of the defendants’ own thoughts, experiences and memories of CIA torture. The decision undermines the government’s claim that the military commission system is transparent and deals a grave blow to its legitimacy.”

In its request, the government had contended that any statements by the defendants’ concerning their “exposure” to the CIA’s detention and interrogation program are classified as “sources, methods and activities” of the U.S. and can be withheld from the public.


Read more: http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/latest-national/military-casualties/39083-judge-rules-for-censorship-of-torture-testimony-at-guantanamo-military-commission.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Rules For Censorship Of Torture Testimony At Guantánamo Military Commission (Original Post) Purveyor Dec 2012 OP
BUT OF COURSE AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #1
Sickening. (nt) enough Dec 2012 #2
Then Just Cut Out Their Tongues JoSpits Dec 2012 #3
Wouldn't want to indict Bush/Cheney or military brass for International law breaking. teddy51 Dec 2012 #4
The Judge is a COWARD. They_Live Dec 2012 #5
What country is this? Comrade Grumpy Dec 2012 #6
By government - who made the request? JonLP24 Dec 2012 #7
here comes the new boss same as the old boss dembotoz Dec 2012 #8
Gee, it's a good thing we have a Democratic president. forestpath Dec 2012 #9
RIGHT UP THERE WITH NORTH KOREA! /nt Ash_F Dec 2012 #10
So this John2 Dec 2012 #11
But what relevance does the torture have regarding the alleged crimes? cstanleytech Dec 2012 #13
What if this was an American citizen? BetsysGhost Dec 2012 #14
Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #12

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
7. By government - who made the request?
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 06:19 PM
Dec 2012

The DOJ? Let me guess, they didn't have choice, they had to make the request.

dembotoz

(16,808 posts)
8. here comes the new boss same as the old boss
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 06:25 PM
Dec 2012

i guess we were fooled again


frankly i had hoped for better from us but this is what i would have pretty much expected

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
11. So this
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 07:21 PM
Dec 2012

Judge is not held under the rules of evidence, just because he is in a military proceeding? Why is this not suppression of evidence? So he can obstruct justice? What if this was an American citizen?

cstanleytech

(26,293 posts)
13. But what relevance does the torture have regarding the alleged crimes?
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 10:08 PM
Dec 2012

I mean sure if a confession or evidence obtained from said confession were being used I could see allowing it in but otherwise it would surely taint the case to much for it to be heard as in impartial manner as possible wouldnt it?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
12. Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee.
Wed Dec 12, 2012, 09:30 PM
Dec 2012

No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main; if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were; any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.

Neither can we call this a begging of misery, or a borrowing of misery, as though we were not miserable enough of ourselves, but must fetch in more from the next house, in taking upon us the misery of our neighbors. Truly it were an excusable covetousness if we did; for affliction is a treasure, and scarce any man hath enough of it. No man hath afflicion enough, that is not matured and ripened by it, and made fit for God by that affliction. If a man carry treasure in bullion or in a wedge of gold, and have none coined into current moneys, his treasure will not defray him as he travels. Tribulation is treasure in the nature of it, but it is not current money in the use of it, except we get nearer and nearer our home, heaven, by it. Another may be sick too, and sick to death, and this affliction may lie in his bowels, as gold in a mine, and be of no use to him; but this bell that tells me of his affliction, digs out, and applies that gold to me: if by this consideration of another's danger, I take mine own into contemplation, and so secure myself, by making my recourse to my God, who is our only security.

http://www.luminarium.org/sevenlit/donne/meditation17.php

The Works of John Donne

When one prisoner is tortured, we are all tortured.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge Rules For Censorshi...