Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

autorank

(29,457 posts)
Sat May 4, 2024, 01:21 AM May 4

'It's significant': Law professor says key Trump defense can be blown up with one question

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Emile (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: RAWSTORY

5/3/24 11:27PM.

"Donald Trump's key defense in his hush money cover-up case could be dismantled if the New York prosecutors decide to ask Michael Cohen about one thing, a law professor said on Friday."



Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-one-question-significant-cohen/



It's a PERRY MASON moment!
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'It's significant': Law professor says key Trump defense can be blown up with one question (Original Post) autorank May 4 OP
Does anyone really question whether trump paid the $130,000? Think issue is can DA show Silent Type May 4 #1
It's easy. Cohen would have had to declare the $130,000 on his federal tax return no_hypocrisy May 4 #2
Cohen reportedly *DID* pay taxes on it, reporting it as income and not reimbursement. thesquanderer May 4 #3
Thank you as I didn't know that at all. no_hypocrisy May 4 #4
After an alert and discussion with the hosts locking. Emile May 4 #5

Silent Type

(3,337 posts)
1. Does anyone really question whether trump paid the $130,000? Think issue is can DA show
Sat May 4, 2024, 01:56 AM
May 4

he did it in furtherance of the crime of election interference (and jury buys into that). I’m sure he did, but I wouldn’t have made it through jury selection.

no_hypocrisy

(46,566 posts)
2. It's easy. Cohen would have had to declare the $130,000 on his federal tax return
Sat May 4, 2024, 06:57 AM
May 4

as reimbursement of a debt, in order not to pay taxes on that amount as "Income."

He could submit his 2016 Return as documentary support of his contention that he was paid back by Trump.

And the next question would be, "Why would you lend that amount of money to a Billionaire in the first place?"

thesquanderer

(12,031 posts)
3. Cohen reportedly *DID* pay taxes on it, reporting it as income and not reimbursement.
Sat May 4, 2024, 09:13 AM
May 4

That's why Trump actually gave him far more than $130k, so he'd be able to report it as income and not reimbursement but still end up getting back the full $130k net after taxes.

no_hypocrisy

(46,566 posts)
4. Thank you as I didn't know that at all.
Sat May 4, 2024, 09:41 AM
May 4

Emile

(23,829 posts)
5. After an alert and discussion with the hosts locking.
Sat May 4, 2024, 10:38 AM
May 4

No opinion pieces allowed in Latest Breaking News.

Feel free to repost it in General Discussion.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'It's significant': Law p...