Occupy Debt-Relief Campaign Buys $100,000 Worth of Medical Debt
Source: Raw Story
Occupy debt-relief campaign buys $100,000 worth of debt
By Arturo Garcia
Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:58 EST
Members of a debt relief project borne from the Occupy Wall Street campaign said Wednesday they have purchased more than $100,000 worth of medical debt in a second trial run for their efforts.
Thomas Gokey, a spokesperson for the Rolling Jubilee campaign, said the debt was purchased for $5,000. Earlier this year, the group bought $14,000 worth of debt for $500.
- snip -
A fundraising concert is scheduled to be held Thursday in New York City, with the group seeking to raise $50,000 in order to buy and wipe out $1 million worth of medical debt.
Gokey said the group behind the project, Strike Debt, had bought its own 501 c(4) to manage the funds it manages to raise, and that his group was working with unspecified business insiders, lawyers and accountants. While the campaign is not targeting individual debtors in its purchases, people who are part of the buys will be notified soon that their obligations have been discharged.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/15/occupy-debt-relief-campaign-buys-100000-worth-of-debt
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)2on2u
(1,843 posts)hospital charging 140$ for a tylenol, or 1000$ for a toothbrush and it all makes sense.
http://am.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/01/health-care-prescription-for-waste-1000-toothbrush/
Health care Prescription for waste: $1000 toothbrush
Editor's Note: All this week, in the American Morning original series "Health care Prescription for waste," we're examining more waste in the health care system and this time it could involve your money. Today, a medical billing advocate shows our Elizabeth Cohen some of the wasteful charges she's seen in bills. And tomorrow on American Morning, we go shopping for health care to show you how you can save hundreds when it comes to your own medical bills.
(CNN) Imagine someone spending a thousand bucks for a toothbrush. It might be amusing if it wasn't your money. Consider this: for every dollar we spend on health care, fifty cents is wasted.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)have been left mostly unscathed when it comes to the scrutiny of the healthcare industries. In my city there are 3 major entities that own 99% of the healthcare access, hospitals, urgent care and specialty groups and doctors. All three have roots as non profit entities from days when they were completely financed by charitable donations before there was such a thing as "health insurance" as we know it. So why do they charge so much for a tylenol? It's collusion, complicit highway robbery along with the insurance industry.
2on2u
(1,843 posts)justice1
(795 posts)PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)(or those whose insurance company refuses to pay for a "preexisting condition" will get billed the full price rather than the discounted fee negotiated by the insurance company. The difference can be significant.
SomeGuyInEagan
(1,515 posts)The primary creditor can then charge it against their books as an unpaid debt - common business practice. It's off their books.
Then the secondary creditor goes after the debt. As they paid a fraction of the amount owed, they will try for the whole thing but are willing to negotiate.
Dubster
(427 posts)sdfernando
(4,935 posts)I wasn't sure they would be able to get this off the ground but looks like they are make it happen. Totally AWESOME!
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,451 posts).
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]http://occupywallst.org/about/
Now that the political campaigns are over (for the moment), what used to go to those can now go to Occupy and other worthy causes.
AllyCat
(16,187 posts)campaigns is now going to these folks and my local food bank.
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]So many worthy causes to choose from, but OWS is right up there, in my book, with the best of them.
aquart
(69,014 posts)SalviaBlue
(2,916 posts)TheAmbivalante
(114 posts)I am positively giddy about a group of the good guys using a financial instrument of the bad guys for, dare I say, good.
WAY TO GO, OCCUPY!
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
sheshe2
(83,770 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)StrayKat
(570 posts)Is there a reason that they are forgiving the debt completely instead of asking the indebted to pay the reduced rate, e.g. if they bought $14,000 for $500 couldn't they renegotiate the debt for $500 - $600 instead of completely erasing it? Wouldn't this still be a huge relief to people with overwhelming debt and allow the project to recoup funds that could be used to extend the same debt relief to others?
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)people a fresh start? Because they actually have a heart and are thinking of people first and not money? Because many people simply cannot afford to pay their medical debt, especially if they have an expensive chronic or serious/life-threatening illness? Because, unlike many other forms of debt, medical debt is unwillingly incurred and punishes people for having the gall to get sick or injured when they have either the wrong insurance company (i.e., one that wants to take premium money but finds all kinds of ways not to pay legitimate claims) or not enough money for it (which is most people, considering just how expensive even simple care is now)? Because theyre already paying enough to stay alive and simply have no more to give?
AllyCat
(16,187 posts)Yeah, that! I tell people about this program and even progressives will say "gosh, how do they get their money back?" Who the frack cares??? The dang credit complex doesn't get to keep shuffling the debt around so they all make money except the person who is in trouble.
kag
(4,079 posts)is that they do ask those who are helped to pay a little bit forward to help others. Thus the "rolling" part of the jubilee. I forget where I read that, though.
Bibliovore
(185 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:10 PM - Edit history (1)
Debt bought and wholly forgiven is over and done, with no need for further tracking except for tax reporting. Debt bought and renegotiated, however, requires ongoing correspondence and record-keeping and accounting and quite possibly legal work until the chosen amount is repaid. If a debtor really didn't have even the renegotiated amount, would some kind of proof be needed (more tracking and record-keeping) before writing off that last bit? If someone agreed to pay a lowered amount, what would happen if they then didn't pay it?
It seems a lot simpler all around to forgive the debt, then encourage those who benefit from this to give what they can toward reducing the debt of others. Someone who couldn't afford $14,000 might be able to give $1000 (or more) to the cause over time instead of just $500, and their friends and family might be moved to donate, too.
StrayKat
(570 posts)What about reporting to credit agencies? Isn't it better for restoring people's credit to be able to report that they've paid off a loan rather than had it completely forgiven?
There's paperwork involved no matter how this is handled.
Bibliovore
(185 posts)But notifying the credit agencies would need to take place regardless, right? Writing the debt off would still prevent other/ongoing tracking.
Also, I know nothing about this, so a few questions about the debt-reporting process:
1) Is there a score difference for complete vs. partial vs. very low payoff amounts? If a large debt is renegotiated to a penny that's then collected, does that appear the same as if the original debt amount were paid in full? Does the remainder count as forgiven regardless?
2) How much discretion does the debt purchaser have in how to classify the handling of a debt? If they're writing off the debt, could they choose to report it as repaid (rather than forgiven) even if no money changes hands?
3) (possible Devil's advocate): Is there reason for concern about the resulting credit report's accuracy? That is, is it a possible problem for future lenders if borrowers' accounts show debt as paid off that they could not in fact afford? Is this affected by what the debt is for, e.g. health care vs. mortgage vs. credit-card bills?
StrayKat
(570 posts)This isn't an area I'm very familiar with. My understanding is that is better to have a record of making more payments than less or none.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Kaleva
(36,301 posts)joanbarnes
(1,722 posts)jerseyjack
(1,361 posts)or paying the discounted amount, the debt will remain on credit bureau records for three years until the last activity.
If judgement, I believe 7 years, bankruptcy, 10 years.
AllyCat
(16,187 posts)to having it unpaid. It allows those involved to start to make things better.
AllyCat
(16,187 posts)Not much, but I will give them what I can for this amazing project. I've been reading about it all over the internet and talking it up to people I work with! Even if you have $5, that wipes out about $150 in debt.
Aquariuswolfe
(1 post)AllyCat...
Where do I go to donate to this awesome program?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Agony
(2,605 posts)Rolling Jubilee
A bailout of the people by the people
Rolling Jubilee is a Strike Debt project that buys debt for pennies on the dollar, but instead of collecting it, abolishes it. Together we can liberate debtors at random through a campaign of mutual support, good will, and collective refusal. Debt resistance is just the beginning. Join us as we imagine and create a new world based on the common good, not Wall Street profits.
Learn more or contribute.
StrikeDebt
As individuals, families, and communities, most of us are drowning in debt to Wall Street for the basic things things we need to live, like housing, education, and health care. Even those of us who do not have personal debt are affected by predatory lending. Our essential public services are cut because our cities and towns are held hostage by the same big banks that have been bailed out by our government in recent years.
We are not a loan. Strike Debt came from a coalition of Occupy groups looking to build popular resistance to all forms of debt imposed on us by the banks. Debt keeps us isolated, ashamed, and afraid. We are building a movement to challenge this system while creating alternatives and supporting each other. We want an economy where our debts are to our friends, families, and communities and not to the 1%.
happyslug
(14,779 posts)The first question is how has to pay this debt? Being a Medical debt, it is dis-chargeable in bankruptcy and under the Federal Exemptions under Bankruptcy Law, if your equity in your home is less $25,000 (and in some circumstances $42,000), if you keep the payments up on the home, you can keep your home. There is also a $2000 equity in one car and $10,000 in any other item (which can be added to the $25,000).
In simple terms, unless you own your home WITHOUT a Mortgage and it is worth more then $25,000, any hospital bill can be discharged through bankruptcy (along with any other debts, including Credit card debt, but NOT student loans, support payments or anything to do with drunk driving or a felony).
In harsh terms, OWS just bought $14,000 of debts that are WORTHLESS for $500. i.e paid $500 for nothing. Another way to look at this, they paid $500 to WALL STREET and received nothing in return,
I am sorry, OWS would be better off giving this money to people who can help people in financial need. Legal Services budget has been cut, I had two more people in my office who are being sued by buyers of such papers, but they are Judgment proof, i.e. if given proper legal advice, will NOT have to pay anything to anyone. I have people with more assists that I have to turn down due to financial constraints, people who I believe will prevail in any lawsuit if someone will prepare the paperwork.
Then I see people buying paper that is probably worthless, giving money to the holders of the paper who normally would have to eat it.
Remember a lot of this paper is against people on Social Security (Which can NOT be attached), on Child Support (which in most states can not be attached), or have property less then the exemption amount from Sheriff''s sale in their home states (i.e. Judgment proof). These people do NOT need people "Buying" this paper, they need advice on how to handle people who are trying to collect on these papers.
I am sorry, OWS would be better off giving this money to Legal Services or some other group to give legal advice to people subject to these debts then to buy the debts off.