Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 10:46 AM Nov 2012

Calif. coastal panel denies permit for offshore earthquake study near nuclear power plant

Source: Associated Press

Citing harm to marine life, California coastal regulators on Wednesday soundly rejected a utility’s plan to map offshore earthquake faults near a nuclear power plant by blasting loud air cannons.

The unanimous vote by the California Coastal Commission came after an hours-long public hearing attended by environmentalists, fishermen and residents who were overwhelmingly opposed to the seismic testing.

The proposed survey by Pacific Gas & Electric Co. involves firing sonic pulses into the ocean. Sensors on the seafloor would pick up the echoes to create 3-D maps of geologic faults that the utility said are needed to understand the seismic hazards around the Diablo Canyon facility.

<snip>

The commission’s staff had urged the panel to reject the plan. In a report this month, the staff said sonic blasts would cause “significant and unavoidable impacts to marine resources.” More than 7,000 sea mammals would be disturbed by the ear-piercing noise, including fin whales, blue whales, humpback whales, and harbor porpoises.

<snip>



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/calif-coastal-panel-rejects-utilitys-proposal-for-mapping-quake-faults-near-nuclear-plant/2012/11/14/13474bfe-2ec1-11e2-b631-2aad9d9c73ac_story.html



Unanimous decision!

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Calif. coastal panel denies permit for offshore earthquake study near nuclear power plant (Original Post) bananas Nov 2012 OP
Two thumbsup! pinto Nov 2012 #1
Hooray for sanity flamingdem Nov 2012 #2
Reopen? I don't think it's closed. NYC_SKP Nov 2012 #3
That's right, I thought this was San Onofre flamingdem Nov 2012 #4
Is there a potential hazard that would require this mapping? Puzzledtraveller Nov 2012 #5
Yeah, it sounds like more of a nuclear industry win than a fish win. nt valerief Nov 2012 #6
For one thing, it's near a fault that wasn't discovered until 2008 bananas Nov 2012 #7

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
5. Is there a potential hazard that would require this mapping?
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 11:26 AM
Nov 2012

As in, we sure as heck would want to mitigate the damages done to a nuclear plant in the event of an earthquake, at that point, there would be no marine life left. Just asking.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
7. For one thing, it's near a fault that wasn't discovered until 2008
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 02:05 PM
Nov 2012

There may be other undiscovered faults in the area. The article mentions: "Diablo Canyon sits within three miles of two underwater earthquake faults, including one that was discovered in 2008."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Calif. coastal panel deni...