In weekly address, Pres. Obama says wealthy Americans should pay more in taxes
Source: Washington Post
President Barack Obama says he wont accept a plan to avert the so-called fiscal cliff that doesnt ask the wealthy to pay more in taxes.
In Saturdays radio and Internet address, Obama says the election showed support for his balanced approach and Congress can provide certainty by extending tax cuts for middle-class families.
(snip)
The White House says Obama would veto any legislation extending tax cuts for families making $250,000 or more.
Obama is expected to meet with congressional leaders next week.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/in-weekly-address-obama-says-wealthy-americans-should-pay-more-in-taxes/2012/11/10/09e19436-2b27-11e2-aaa5-ac786110c486_story.html
&feature=player_embedded
Weekly Address: Extending Middle Class Tax Cuts to Grow the Economy
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/11/09/weekly-address-extending-middle-class-tax-cuts-grow-economy
"Trickle Down" and the Bush tax cuts were supposed to give the wealthy more money so they could re-invest in America: creating jobs and bolstering the economy. It didn't work.
Instead, they invested in foreign countries and hid their swag in secret off-shore tax havens.
Simply stated, the rich didn't live up to their part of the bargain. Now it's time for them to pay it back.
JackN415
(924 posts)hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)Please do not back down, Mr. President!
He ended that with "have a good weekend."
Only a communist, muslim atheist would forget to god bless everyone.
alp227
(32,037 posts)After all, these same fools complained about NBC editing out "under God" from a Pledge of Allegiance segment played before a golf tournament.
President Obama has placed a line in the sand. That is what I'm talking about. Screw the talking heads. You go President Obama! I think Romney did President Obama a favor in those last two Debates. No more Mr nice guy or turning the other cheek.
EC
(12,287 posts)All the other countries are also demanding they pay their taxes. They got away with paying no taxes for decades. They can threaten all they want. If some of these businesses stop producing I'm betting that if the need were there in the first place for that business, someone else will take it up. If they want to move elsewhere, where? They'll have to pay where ever they go.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)sounds fair.
Not really.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)WE CAN ELIMINATE THE DEBT AND DEFICIT BY RETURNING TO THE GREATEST GENERATIONS TAX RATE ON THE ULTRA RICH!
According to the President, eliminating the Bush tax cut (4% increase) will raise 700 billion in revenues in 10 years (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-7032813.html).
Which means a 40% increase on the top tax rate to a rate similar to the pre-Reagan rate of 79.6% would yield 7 trillion in 10 years.
A 58% increase to 94% (the rate the Greatest Generation thought was best) would yield over 10 trillion dollars over the next 10 years.
So our deficit of 1.3 trillion would be gone in a little over a year and our DEBT would be gone in under 10 years (as we pay it down).
Simple! Done and done - and we haven't increased taxes on investment income to pre-Clinton levels yet!
2010 Y1: 14T - 3T (2T normal revenues plus additional 1T from tax on ultra-rich) = 11T debt
2011 Y2: 11T(debt) + 1T(deficit) - 3T = 9T debt
2012 Y3: 9T(debt) + 600B(deficit) - 3T = 6.6T debt
2013 Y4: 6.6T(debt) + 700T(deficit) - 3T = 4.3T debt
2014 Y4: 4.3T(debt) + 800T(deficit) - 3T = 2.1T debt
2015 Y5: 2.1T(debt) + 800T(deficit) - 3T = .1T debt
2016 Y6: .1T(debt) + 900T(deficit) - 3T = +2 Trillion SURPLUS!!!