Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 10:21 PM Oct 2012

Arizona group that donated $11M must open books

Source: San Francisco Chronicle

An Arizona-based non-profit corporation that made the largest anonymous campaign donation in California history must open its books to state campaign finance regulators for an audit, a judge ruled Wednesday.

Sacramento Superior Court Judge Shellyanne Chang ruled that the corporation, Americans for Responsible Leadership, must comply with the order in favor of the Fair Political Practices Commission, which oversees campaign financing in California, by 5 p.m. Thursday.

The corporation made an $11 million donation to a political committee supporting Proposition 32 and opposing Proposition 30. Prop. 32 would ban unions from using paycheck-deducted fees on political campaigns, and Prop. 30 is Gov. Jerry Brown's tax-raising initiative.

... In her ruling, Chang wrote, "The court finds that irreparable harm has occurred and continues to occur as each day passes and voters continue to cast their votes without information that may influence their votes" if the FPPC determines that the Arizona group violated its disclosure requirements.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Arizona-group-that-donated-11M-must-open-books-3998459.php

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Arizona group that donated $11M must open books (Original Post) Newsjock Oct 2012 OP
by 5 p.m. Thursday n/t littlemissmartypants Oct 2012 #1
In other words... Major Nikon Oct 2012 #2
Wondering if a CA judge in a civil matter has the jurisdiction ProgressiveProfessor Oct 2012 #3
Once the money crossed in California, he has jurisdiction demosincebirth Nov 2012 #4
I am not so sure that is the reason ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #7
I pray that Prop. 30 passes and 32 goes down in flames. Left Coast2020 Nov 2012 #5
It looks like they are both going to lose at this point ProgressiveProfessor Nov 2012 #6

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
2. In other words...
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 10:36 PM
Oct 2012

They are against working people using part of their wages for voluntary employee contributions to union PACs, but some shadowy non-profit thinks it can donate millions to the effort to ban it without revealing where the money is coming from. The hypocrisy is stifling.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
3. Wondering if a CA judge in a civil matter has the jurisdiction
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 11:37 PM
Oct 2012

to compel an out of state group to do anything...just wondering

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
7. I am not so sure that is the reason
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:17 AM
Nov 2012

I am familiar with cases where out of state people/organizations blithely ignored out of state legal proceedings without penalty due to lack of jurisdiction. However, IIRC, if you respond, you acknowledge courts jurisdiction. There is a kind of response which says to the court, thanks, but you have no jurisdiction over me. Hoping a lawyer will jump in on this.

Left Coast2020

(2,397 posts)
5. I pray that Prop. 30 passes and 32 goes down in flames.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 01:11 AM
Nov 2012

Governor Brown is putting a lot on the line on 30. Namely his career/name.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
6. It looks like they are both going to lose at this point
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:14 AM
Nov 2012

Brown is pushing hard and the tube is chock a block full of ads on both sides but the polls are trending down for both

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Arizona group that donate...