Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,018 posts)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:49 AM Oct 2012

BREAKING: Obama Releases Off-the-Record Transcript of Des Moines Register Interview

Source: DesMoine Register

Without comment, campaign officials for President Obama this morning released to the Des Moines Register a transcript of an interview he had Tuesday with Laura Hollingsworth, president and publisher of the Register, and Rick Green, editor/vice-president of news. Initially, the White House had asked that the conversation be considered off-the-record and its details not shared with readers. Its release comes on the heels of a Tuesday evening DesMoinesRegister.com blog post by Green questioning why an endorsement interview with the Register would be off-the-record.




Interview of the President by Rick Green & Laura Hollingsworth, The Des Moines Register

..............................

Q: Mr. President, we’re very sensitive to your time. I know you’ve got a busy schedule. But we just had just one last question here. As we close in on the final hours of this campaign -- it’s been a long one. It’s been exhausting. It’s been very, very expensive, as I know you know. Why should the Des Moines Register offer its endorsement to you, sir?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you guys have seen me up close. I wouldn’t be on the national stage had it not been for the people of Iowa. And if you look at what I said to you this time four years ago, and the commitments I’ve made, I have kept and met those commitments, or I have worked really hard to keep them and meet them.

I said that I’d cut taxes for middle-class families -- I did. I said that we would make sure to make college more affordable -- we have. I said I would clean up the financial system and pass the toughest Wall Street reforms since the 1930s, and we have. I said that I would make sure that people don’t go broke in this country because they get sick -- we did that. I said I’d end the war in Iraq -- I have. I said we’d got after al Qaeda and bin Laden -- we have. I said we’d begin a process where we could initially blunt the momentum of the Taliban and then a process in which we’d begin transitioning out -- we’re in the process of doing that.

So across the board, I’ve done what I said. And this is in the midst of I think what everybody would agree were some pretty historic circumstances. And the criteria by which I’ve made these decisions has always been what’s good for America’s families, how do we build our middle class, how do we grow the economy in a way that broad-based and sustainable.

The notion that somehow we’ve been bad for business is obviously contradicted by the evidence. Corporate profits have been at record levels up until maybe last quarter. The stock market basically has recovered all its losses that it experienced from the financial sector. The auto industry has come roaring back. Our exports have doubled.

For the people of Iowa that are so dependent on the agricultural sector -- the agricultural sector has never done better than it has under my administration. Even in the midst of this year’s drought it’s still doing well.

When it comes to clean energy that I talked about so much back in 2007-2008, we’ve doubled our production of clean energy. And we’re starting to see the costs of that energy come down, the number of jobs it generates go up.

I got to tell you, I feel very strongly that I have a record that justifies a second term. But I guess, more importantly, what you also know is that I’m somebody who keeps my word, that I don’t read the polls, that I do what I think is right for the American people, even when it is profoundly unpopular politically. And I think that’s worth something. I think that’s the kind of leadership the people of Iowa want.

Q: Very good.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Bye-bye.

Read more: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20121024/NEWS09/121024003/After-editor-s-blog-President-Obama-releases-transcript-of-Register-interview?Frontpage&nclick_check=1

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Obama Releases Off-the-Record Transcript of Des Moines Register Interview (Original Post) kpete Oct 2012 OP
Smart move by the campaign. The paper was saying as much (that it was a good talk) DHelix Oct 2012 #1
Mitt Romney Now On "Obfuscation Tour" - Please Repeat StevePaulson Oct 2012 #2
+1 Romney Obfuscation Tour. nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2012 #15
Romney Obfuscation Tour lapfog_1 Oct 2012 #37
I Wonder If "Romnesia" DallasNE Oct 2012 #18
Don't really see a reason to have kept this 'off the record' in the first place. randome Oct 2012 #3
They have to mention that it was done "off the record" because it wasn't explicity "on" the record George II Oct 2012 #6
One never knows how the press will retell a story. peace13 Oct 2012 #10
it was an endorsement interview, and he had no way of knowing what it entailed. progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #24
He's got my vote - based on that TRUE record, who wouldn't vote for him? George II Oct 2012 #4
I love this guy.......... Buddaman Oct 2012 #5
Me too. He is so straight forward and decent. SalviaBlue Oct 2012 #20
People just hate it when government lets everybody have a better life nolabels Oct 2012 #7
They were probably expecting something like... Liberal Veteran Oct 2012 #8
Now THAT'S clever! Kablooie Oct 2012 #9
I don't understand why the Obama campaign is not making Hutzpa Oct 2012 #11
I agree completely! AndyA Oct 2012 #12
Down ticket democrats should be using Hutzpa Oct 2012 #13
I am going to do a video highlighting this. nt ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #21
. Hutzpa Oct 2012 #23
I don't get it think_critically Oct 2012 #14
Does this mean it's now "on the record"? marshall Oct 2012 #16
Maybe by saying it was off the record the right wing media think it is damaging and would swoop in kimbutgar Oct 2012 #17
What a stupid little tempest in a teapot mainer Oct 2012 #19
Or they want to use part of it to explain an endorsement, if it he gets one. nt progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #25
Which is a big fat clue that they're going to endorse Romney mainer Oct 2012 #26
Why would you think that the Register is endorsing Romney? CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #28
Their big fat whine about Obama being off the record sounded like an excuse mainer Oct 2012 #34
I get what you are saying...and you might be right. CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #35
Since when do the endorsement interviews go on record that way? good move by the Prez progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #22
If this was planned, it's freaking brilliant. Politicub Oct 2012 #27
My initial impression was that it was a brilliant move as well... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #30
Wonderful innoculation against any soon-to-be thrown mud bucolic_frolic Oct 2012 #29
This is interesting stuff... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #31
Off the record, Obama still reasonable. Off the record, Romney disses the 47%. mainer Oct 2012 #32
Love this! mzmolly Oct 2012 #33
Notice he never mentioned Romney. donheld Oct 2012 #36

DHelix

(89 posts)
1. Smart move by the campaign. The paper was saying as much (that it was a good talk)
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:53 AM
Oct 2012

And it sounds like he made a great case for himself so this was a good move.

StevePaulson

(174 posts)
2. Mitt Romney Now On "Obfuscation Tour" - Please Repeat
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:55 AM
Oct 2012

I wish I had thought of the word Romnesia.

All I can come up with, pertaining to Romney's constant lying is.

"Obfuscation Tour"

Roll with it!!!!!

http://www.RepublicansAreADisease.com

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. Don't really see a reason to have kept this 'off the record' in the first place.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:56 AM
Oct 2012

But good interview, Mr. President!

George II

(67,782 posts)
6. They have to mention that it was done "off the record" because it wasn't explicity "on" the record
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:59 AM
Oct 2012

Besides, it looks better that way, too - that he wasn't blowing smoke because it may not have been published.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
10. One never knows how the press will retell a story.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:18 AM
Oct 2012

I know that I have talked to reporters and when I read the article was not sure that the reporter was at the same meeting that i had been. At this late date President Obama can't risk a reporter going off message with false information. As the article said, historically, these things have been done off the record. Nothing new here. Why risk it?

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
24. it was an endorsement interview, and he had no way of knowing what it entailed.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:36 PM
Oct 2012

you don't customarily release those... so it was probably off the record in advance, because he actually SAYS in the interview, "because this is off the record" Then the paper changed their agreement, and put them in a position to either allow it to be released, or let the republicans wonder and speculate. Worked out well. Even off the record the President sounds exactly right.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
7. People just hate it when government lets everybody have a better life
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:00 AM
Oct 2012

Well at least that is what the corporate owned news would like us to believe

Liberal Veteran

(22,239 posts)
8. They were probably expecting something like...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:07 AM
Oct 2012

"And I promise when we start shipping people to our FEMA re-education camps, that those camps will headquartered in Iowa and trillions of dollars will be funneled to the state economy."

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
9. Now THAT'S clever!
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:14 AM
Oct 2012

They made the interview off the record.
Then they waited untl the paper informed the public they had a very interesting interview they couldn't share which makes everyone terribly curious as to what he said.

Then release the interview and EVERYONE will read it, not just the regular political junkies.

They may even get national exposure from this.
That's smart politicking.

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
11. I don't understand why the Obama campaign is not making
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:23 AM
Oct 2012

noise about what Mitch McConnell said about denying president Obama a second term their top priority. They can at least make his words an internet ad. I feel those words are much more effective in way that it exposes their hypocrisy.




AndyA

(16,993 posts)
12. I agree completely!
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:44 AM
Oct 2012

When someone like Mitch McConnell makes a statement like that, it should be covered by the media. Obviously, the GOP has made good on McConnell's statement, too. At the cost of the American people and the economy. Why would anyone vote for any Republican who allowed people to suffer for political gain?

I also recall John Boehner stating that the message from the people after the 2010 election was received loud and clear: we want JOBS. How many jobs bills has the GOP leadership in the House submitted? Zero. If the GOP got the message loud and clear in 2010, they surely haven't paid any attention to it. Therefore, they aren't doing their jobs and shouldn't be re-elected to their positions.

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
13. Down ticket democrats should be using
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 11:54 AM
Oct 2012

this stuff to their advantage. It is the perfect scenario to kick the do nothings out from Congress.

 

think_critically

(118 posts)
14. I don't get it
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 12:22 PM
Oct 2012

They should blast this transcript out all over the place. If I were them I would purchase ad space in EVERY major swing state newspaper and post this transcript. This is the best case I have seen him make for re-election. I'm stunned that h hasn't made the case like this in public.

kimbutgar

(21,195 posts)
17. Maybe by saying it was off the record the right wing media think it is damaging and would swoop in
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:02 PM
Oct 2012

to report it. A lot of the right wing talking points are debunked in this interview. I think this was a head fake by the President to fool the MSM media.

mainer

(12,029 posts)
19. What a stupid little tempest in a teapot
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:24 PM
Oct 2012

The Des Moines Register looks ridiculous now for whining about it.

mainer

(12,029 posts)
26. Which is a big fat clue that they're going to endorse Romney
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:44 PM
Oct 2012

and they wanted this petty little excuse for why.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
28. Why would you think that the Register is endorsing Romney?
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:56 PM
Oct 2012

Maybe I'm missing something?

I imagine that if any newspaper calls a candidate for the express purpose of interviewing them to determine endorsements--that the interview would be "off the record". The journalists aren't calling for specific comments on a story. They're calling to have a long, lengthy, detailed interview during a Presidential campaign.

I imagine the President's handlers would tell them that the interview is "off the record".

I've worked in PR for nearly two decades. I certainly don't know everything about each particular situation, but this seems standard to me.

Maybe I am missing something, but I am intrigued by your comments.

I hope the Register does not endorse Romney. I live in Des Moines, and they are a very liberal newspaper. A Romney endorsement would be disappointing to say the least, especially with Iowa being a swing state.

mainer

(12,029 posts)
34. Their big fat whine about Obama being off the record sounded like an excuse
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:45 PM
Oct 2012

for their forthcoming endorsement of the other guy.

It's almost as if they're giving their readership an explanation for why they're NOT going to endorse Obama.

But I hope I'm wrong. I hope I'm just interpreting this the wrong way.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
35. I get what you are saying...and you might be right.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 03:18 PM
Oct 2012

I just went over the Register and read more about this.

It's interesting. We just don't know right now.

If I had to guess, I'd say that the Register will endorse Obama. That's just my best guess right now, based on nothing more than opinion and a sneaking suspicion.

They announce this weekend, so I guess we will find out soon enough.

Thanks for your thoughts!!

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
22. Since when do the endorsement interviews go on record that way? good move by the Prez
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:33 PM
Oct 2012

That's a great interview. Glad they shared it.

So does he get the endorsement???

Politicub

(12,165 posts)
27. If this was planned, it's freaking brilliant.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 01:49 PM
Oct 2012

Still in awe of the smart people running Obama's campaign.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
30. My initial impression was that it was a brilliant move as well...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:04 PM
Oct 2012

Releasing an "off the record" conversation gives the reader the feeling that they are reading behind-the-scenes conversations that shed light on what the interviewee is truly like.

"Off the record" implies that the person being interviewed had their guard down. This is their authentic, raw self when they're not scripted.

This indirectly gives more credibility to the statements. In effect, releasing statements made off the record makes the expressed statements seem more believable.

This is being done in Iowa--a swing state. The race is close here.

Seems to me, this is a good way for the Obama campaign to add some credibility to a very critical message---that Obama has kept many promises and has accomplished many things. Also, that he has tried his best and has secured many successes (Wall Street reform, healthcare reform, etc.).

Great move, from a PR standpoint.

As for who the Register is endorsing--that's a whole separate issue. Someone else said they thought this mean that Romney was being endorsed. I think it looks as if the Register is playing ball with Obama--helping him to disseminate his message. If they are endorsing Romney--maybe this is the consolation prize? Just guessing. I expect the Register to endorse Obama, but we'll see, I guess.

bucolic_frolic

(43,295 posts)
29. Wonderful innoculation against any soon-to-be thrown mud
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:03 PM
Oct 2012

So I guess the Obama Campaign got the whole interview out there

not just what the Editorial Board might select.

And its release gives them some cover in the event the paper
endorses the other guy

So the drama was worth it. I guess there would have been no drama
had the paper simply accepted its off the record status?

And this does kind of preclude the paper from claiming anything else was said

Smart, controlled, almost self-edited. Let's hope Obama carries Iowa

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
31. This is interesting stuff...
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:22 PM
Oct 2012

I just read the entire post and the transcript.

Apparently, a Des Moines Register blogger questioned why the Obama Administration requested that the interview be "off the record."

I guess that's a fair question. Although, I always thought that these types of interviews would be "off the record" unless of course the paper did choose to endorse. Then, the details are released. If you are not endorsed, your words could be used against you, I suppose.

So, this is curious.

And I'm also wondering. Did Romney give an interview with the Register? Was Romney's interview also "off the record"? Those are questions, I'd love to know.

Others are speculating about whether or not these events hint at the Register's endorsement decisions.

On one hand--releasing this only helps the President. This is basically the campaign's mission statement and closing arguments. The campaign would want EVERY Iowan to read this and give it consideration. Labeling it "off the record" and releasing it stokes curiosity and draws readers in. Maybe the Obama campaign just wanted to do this as an extra push in Iowa? Maybe they're releasing the "off the record" status--because Obama is being endorsed by the Register.

On the other hand--One could assume that Obama wanted his remarks to the Register published--because Romney may be getting endorsed. Obama wants his side out there to Iowans as well.

No doubt, these newspapers call each of the campaigns to inform them of their endorsement decisions--before they are made public. That gives the campaigns time to react and create their own messaging surrounding these events.

It's kind of a mystery isn't it??? We'll find out soon enough. I am in Iowa--in Des Moines actually--and I will be shocked if the Register, a left-leaning paper, endorses Romney. They are owned by Gannett though. I'll be shocked and saddened if they endorse Romney.

mainer

(12,029 posts)
32. Off the record, Obama still reasonable. Off the record, Romney disses the 47%.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:25 PM
Oct 2012

And the newspaper's peeved about that?

mzmolly

(51,004 posts)
33. Love this!
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 02:31 PM
Oct 2012
I said that I’d cut taxes for middle-class families -- I did.
I said that we would make sure to make college more affordable -- we have.
I said I would clean up the financial system and pass the toughest Wall Street reforms since the 1930s, and we have.
I said that I would make sure that people don’t go broke in this country because they get sick -- we did that.
I said I’d end the war in Iraq -- I have.
I said we’d got after al Qaeda and bin Laden -- we have.
I said we’d begin a process where we could initially blunt the momentum of the Taliban and then a process in which we’d begin transitioning out -- we’re in the process of doing that.

So across the board, I’ve done what I said. And this is in the midst of I think what everybody would agree were some pretty historic circumstances.


donheld

(21,311 posts)
36. Notice he never mentioned Romney.
Thu Oct 25, 2012, 01:49 AM
Oct 2012

He only talked about his accomplishments so far. I kind of think If they asked Romney the same thing he'd have only thrown mud at Obama and not talked about any of his own plans.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BREAKING: Obama Releases ...