Ryan hits administration's China policy in Ohio campaign stop
Source: nbcnews.com
Ryan told the crowd in the heavily manufacturing Buckeye State that a Mitt Romney administration would not tolerate China stealing American jobs and property rights -- a topic the VP nominee frequently talks about on the campaign trail.
We are going to stop this kind of cheating from occurring, if people are manipulating our currency, we are going to say that they are manipulating our currency. If they are stealing our products, we are going to say stop stealing our products or else you have consequences. Thats a big deal. That takes our jobs, he said.
Read more: http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/13/14417302-ryan-hits-administrations-china-policy-in-ohio-campaign-stop?lite
The duplicity, lies and cheating of Romney and Ryan! What about Romney and Bain and their love for China and sending American jobs overseas. They were quite happy to let GM die and let the Japanese head the US car market!
Someone needs to call them out on this.
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)Bain currently outsourcing jobs to China and flying the Chinese flag in the US.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Kind of makes it impossible for Mitty to bring up "the China test" on Tuesday now doesn't it?
OhZone
(3,212 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)I thought that was TREASON
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)like a snowball's chance in hell I guess?
Well at least The Obama campaign can call them out!
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)But if you watch the vid, the Freeport plant DID bring down our flag while the Chinese visited the plant for training.
We gotta get the details exactly right to make contact.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)TomCADem
(17,387 posts)Romney-Ryan's hypocrisy is breathtaking...
http://www.tnr.com/blog/107685/when-romney-was-anti-anti-china-not-so-long-ago#
Romney: Im glad I can address that in this room, because this is a sophisticated audience and my answer cannot be boiled down to a couple of lines. There is understandable resistance on the part of almost all people to any change that would provide additional productivity. Now, you hear all around America, everyone cheers productivity, but thats just because most people dont know what it is. They think productivity means everyones working harder and faster and better and therefore were all doing better. But productivity really means that more stuff is being created by fewer people. If a nation is highly productive it means that fewer people are able to make more and more stuff. And the nations wealth is a function of how productive it is, how much stuff is made by its people, and if you want to see wealthier and wealthier people, you want to see more and more productivity, or more and more things made by the people of that nation.
A lot of people dont like that idea. You may say, sure, everybody does. A simple example -- lets pretend theres a little country with 200 people. This is a long time ago -- 100 people raise the food, 100 people build the homes. Someone comes up with the idea of making a plow, hitching it to a farm animal and now they only need 50 people to raise the food. Is that a good idea or a bad idea? To the 50 people who lose their jobs, its a very bad idea, and they will resist with great energy and passion the idea of allowing horses to draw plows because it will make their life far more uncertain, at best. Those of us who stand back a bit say, no no no, dont you understand that by having these plows and releasing those 50 people that someone, one of them or someone else is going to come up with something else for them to do? Making chairs, making movies whatever that is going to make everyone better off. More productivity will make everybody wealthier and more successful.
And that is something which is lost on a lot of people in this country. The tire workers of America look at these tires coming in from China and say this is not good for me. And I understand that and they -- and the corporations, its not just the unions by the way, its the corporate executives and the shareholders and all the wealth owners, capitalists behind the tire industry -- are saying dont let those foreign tires in here, its gonna hurt me. And it will -- as those tires come in it does hurt them directly, and therefore what their response is, their immediate response is, dont let them in. But if thats what their response is, my experience is over time, they will lose out slowly but surely, as they protect their lack of productivity with barriers, they will become less and less competitive, the foreign guys will get more and more volume, more and more successful, theyll become more and more productive, the domestic guys get less and less productive, less and less competitive, until finally even the tariff cant hold them out and the foreign products come flooding into the marketplace and the domestic guys are gone.
So putting barriers up, trying to put walls up, in my opinion is a defeating strategy and will yield ultimate decline and collapse. The alternative strategy, by the way, as you know is, to say, OK, those guys have figured out a way to make tires in a more productive way than we have, and were going to have to find another way to compete. Were going to have to find a way to use our ingenuity and our investments, new capital, were going to have to find way to compete or were gonna be gone. And so were gonna either close the doors today or were gonna compete head on. And by the way, the same is true in the automotive industry. Weve watched our market share go down, go down, go down, because we are not productively competitive with foreign manufacturers and transplants that are here. If we invest in productivity here we can be globally competitive.
So, long story short, the wrong answer for Americas workers and for the wealth of every citizen of this nation is to try and put up barriers to stop competition, either domestic competition or competition from abroad. The right answer is always to see competition as an opportunity and a necessity for investment, innovation, technology and becoming more productive. If we do that well be a wealthier nation and well be able to remain the powerful nation we must remain to have a strong and powerful military, which we must have to protect freedom.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)we need some TV ads and billboards up. We have the money.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)...on his hypocrisy. Look at the stories airing about Romney attacking President Obama for not being tough enough on China.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)hypocrite through and through
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)We really need to push this one to the point that Ryan wished that he had never said this.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)enough said.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)Romney. Bain. Sensata.
Go ahead, Ryan! Mention how you and Mitt will "not tolerate" China stealing American jobs again.
Make our day!
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)LEt's see what the public thinks of that!
BrainMann1
(460 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Has this bozo checked with his running mate? That is what Bain is all about. How often has this happened? And what can the government do to stop it? At least the President has made proposals. Which the Republicans shut down.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)ladym55
(2,577 posts)I was on the campus in Youngstown this morning same time and place as Lyin' Ryan ... very different event.
One hour before the "big event" I had NO trouble parking my car or accessing my event.
Sadly, the people who came to hear Ryan promise not to send jobs to China were largely blue collar white men and women approaching the age of Medicare. They proudly wore their "NOBAMA" buttons. They were a trickle, not a crowd.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)cynzke
(1,254 posts)How the hell can the chinese be stealing our jobs? They are BUYING them. Share this story with your FB friends and spread the word.