District Court Judge Brett Ludwig dismissed Trump's case in Wisconsin "with prejudice,"

[weissmam]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by JudyM (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Daily Kos

what is this 56 , 57 I am loosing count , and Rudy even mentioned this one this morning

Read more: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/12/12/2001595/-Trump-appointed-federal-judge-hands-down-a-scalding-decision-in-extraordinary-case

[DonViejo]

1. 58.

[marylandblue]

2. @marcelias says 58 as of today.

[mpcamb]

3. Are they going to sue for CONTEMPT for wasting the courts time on this and all the other BS cases?

Somebody. sometime!
Take it on!

[Ford_Prefect]

4. That's going to leave a mark...

[BumRushDaShow]

5. 1-58

Link to tweet

TEXT

Marc E. Elias
@marceelias
🚨
🚨
BREAKING: Wisconsin Federal Court DISMISSES Trump lawsuit WITH PREJUDICE.

"This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits."

Trump and his allies are now 1-58 in post-election litigation.
🚨ALERT: TRUMP LAWSUIT DISMISSED
Trump lawsuit challenging the 2020 election results in Wisconsin dismissed.
democracydocket.com
2:05 PM · Dec 12, 2020

[Cha]

6. Rt.. Lost on Merits.. Again! TY!!

[dalton99a]

8. +1

[groundloop]

9. And that 1 "win" was a very minor procedural change

Something about allowing official observers to be 6 feet away from vote counters as opposed to 10 feet away, so that "victory" changed nothing.

[WheelWalker]

11. I think the "win" was ephemeral. IIRC, the court granted the relief, but the state/county

had already agreed to and complied with/implemented the requested relief.

[ancianita]

7. Rachel and Marc Elias both said last night that he was at 60, so this must be 61.

[Septua]

10. What part of "NO" do you not understand?

And what part of "YOU LOST, ASSHOLE" does Trump not understand?

[George II]

12. If I remember correctly, even the ONE that he won was reversed by a higher court.

[appmanga]

13. Don't loose your count...

...it might fall off.

Edited to say: even if you're not a lawyer, you should read this decision simply to see the amount of disdain this judge has for this whole spectacle.

[question everything]

14. But WI Supreme Court has yet to rule?

[JudyM]

15. Locking

After review by forum hosts - post doesn’t meet LBN’s formatting and content rules.