Top Romney Adviser: States Will Have To Cover People With Pre-Existing Conditions Under President Ro
Source: TPM
After the first presidential debate at the University of Denver in Colorado on Wednesday night, one of Mitt Romneys top advisers acknowledged that, as a result Romneys plan to repeal Obamacare, people with pre-existing medical conditions would likely be unable to purchase insurance.
With respect to pre-existing conditions, what Governor Romney has said is for those with continuous coverage, he would continue to make sure that they receive their coverage, said Eric Fehrnstrom, referring to existing laws which require insurance companies to sell coverage to people who already have insurance, or within 90 days of losing their employer coverage.
Pressed by TPMs Evan McMorris-Santoro, Fehrnstrom said those who currently lack coverage because they have pre-existing conditions would need their states to implement their own laws like Romneys own Massachusetts health care law that ban insurance company from discriminating against sick people.
Wed like to see states do what Massachusetts did, Fehrnstrom said. In Massachusetts we have a ban on pre-existing conditions.
Read more: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/top-romney-adviser-states-will-have-to-cover-people-with-pre-existing-conditions-under-president-rom.php?ref=fpa
Erik Fehrnstrom! The creator of the Romney Etch-s-Sketch
lalalu
(1,663 posts)And so it begins.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Wouldn't a down economy absolutely decimate already tight state budgets?
TXDemoGal
(59 posts)So my dear state of Texas will cover my pre-existing condition?
Yeah, that'll happen...about the time hell freezes over.
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)...Romney campaign is starting to walk back things that Romney said.
wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)notice how many states covered preexisting conditions- 1 and that all it will ever be.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)It is a return to the status quo before 2009.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)Instead of one federal if banning the pre exising condition exclusion is a good idea?
Arithmetic says it doesn't add up...
randome
(34,845 posts)But this idiotic 'plan' -which is something Romney pulled out of his ass at the last minute- doesn't take into account people moving from state to state.
AardvarkAsparagus
(11 posts)Fehrnstrom said. In Massachusetts we have a ban on pre-existing conditions.
I guess people with pre-existing cannot move to Massachusetts. Or does he mean they provide for cradle to grave?
Javaman
(62,532 posts)oldbanjo
(690 posts)that if you have Ins existing conditions would be covered, but if for 45 years you have had no Ins you would not be covered, you gambled and lost.