Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 11:58 PM Oct 2012

Top Romney Adviser: States Will Have To Cover People With Pre-Existing Conditions Under President Ro

Source: TPM

After the first presidential debate at the University of Denver in Colorado on Wednesday night, one of Mitt Romney’s top advisers acknowledged that, as a result Romney’s plan to repeal Obamacare, people with pre-existing medical conditions would likely be unable to purchase insurance.

“With respect to pre-existing conditions, what Governor Romney has said is for those with continuous coverage, he would continue to make sure that they receive their coverage,” said Eric Fehrnstrom, referring to existing laws which require insurance companies to sell coverage to people who already have insurance, or within 90 days of losing their employer coverage.

Pressed by TPM’s Evan McMorris-Santoro, Fehrnstrom said those who currently lack coverage because they have pre-existing conditions would need their states to implement their own laws — like Romney’s own Massachusetts health care law — that ban insurance company from discriminating against sick people.

“We’d like to see states do what Massachusetts did,” Fehrnstrom said. “In Massachusetts we have a ban on pre-existing conditions.”

Read more: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/top-romney-adviser-states-will-have-to-cover-people-with-pre-existing-conditions-under-president-rom.php?ref=fpa



Erik Fehrnstrom! The creator of the Romney Etch-s-Sketch
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top Romney Adviser: States Will Have To Cover People With Pre-Existing Conditions Under President Ro (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2012 OP
Flip Flop lalalu Oct 2012 #1
States are unable to deficit spend as far as I understand. Ed Suspicious Oct 2012 #2
Wow...that's a relief TXDemoGal Oct 2012 #3
See? The debate is only a few minutes ago and already... TomCADem Oct 2012 #4
We had that system before Obamacare wilt the stilt Oct 2012 #5
The Romney plan is to repeal obamacare and replace it with nothing. Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #6
Why is it better to have 50 individual laws Paulie Oct 2012 #7
Not only that. randome Oct 2012 #8
Ban on pre-existing conditions? AardvarkAsparagus Oct 2012 #9
First you say you do and then you don't, then you say you will and then you won't. nt Javaman Oct 2012 #10
A few weeks ago Ryan explained oldbanjo Oct 2012 #11
So, let's have 50 different plans. sinkingfeeling Oct 2012 #12

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
2. States are unable to deficit spend as far as I understand.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:09 AM
Oct 2012

Wouldn't a down economy absolutely decimate already tight state budgets?

TXDemoGal

(59 posts)
3. Wow...that's a relief
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:16 AM
Oct 2012

So my dear state of Texas will cover my pre-existing condition?

Yeah, that'll happen...about the time hell freezes over.






TomCADem

(17,390 posts)
4. See? The debate is only a few minutes ago and already...
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 12:16 AM
Oct 2012

...Romney campaign is starting to walk back things that Romney said.

 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
5. We had that system before Obamacare
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 07:11 AM
Oct 2012

notice how many states covered preexisting conditions- 1 and that all it will ever be.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
6. The Romney plan is to repeal obamacare and replace it with nothing.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 07:23 AM
Oct 2012

It is a return to the status quo before 2009.

Paulie

(8,462 posts)
7. Why is it better to have 50 individual laws
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 07:41 AM
Oct 2012

Instead of one federal if banning the pre exising condition exclusion is a good idea?

Arithmetic says it doesn't add up...

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
8. Not only that.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 08:22 AM
Oct 2012

But this idiotic 'plan' -which is something Romney pulled out of his ass at the last minute- doesn't take into account people moving from state to state.

9. Ban on pre-existing conditions?
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 08:27 AM
Oct 2012
Fehrnstrom said. “In Massachusetts we have a ban on pre-existing conditions.”


I guess people with pre-existing cannot move to Massachusetts. Or does he mean they provide for cradle to grave?

oldbanjo

(690 posts)
11. A few weeks ago Ryan explained
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 08:54 AM
Oct 2012

that if you have Ins existing conditions would be covered, but if for 45 years you have had no Ins you would not be covered, you gambled and lost.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top Romney Adviser: State...